Sasson Noah J, Pinkham Amy E, Weittenhiller Lauren P, Faso Daniel J, Simpson Claire
School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX;
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.
Schizophr Bull. 2016 May;42(3):675-83. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv176. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
Although Schizophrenia (SCZ) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) share impairments in emotion recognition, the mechanisms underlying these impairments may differ. The current study used the novel "Emotions in Context" task to examine how the interpretation and visual inspection of facial affect is modulated by congruent and incongruent emotional contexts in SCZ and ASD. Both adults with SCZ (n= 44) and those with ASD (n= 21) exhibited reduced affect recognition relative to typically-developing (TD) controls (n= 39) when faces were integrated within broader emotional scenes but not when they were presented in isolation, underscoring the importance of using stimuli that better approximate real-world contexts. Additionally, viewing faces within congruent emotional scenes improved accuracy and visual attention to the face for controls more so than the clinical groups, suggesting that individuals with SCZ and ASD may not benefit from the presence of complementary emotional information as readily as controls. Despite these similarities, important distinctions between SCZ and ASD were found. In every condition, IQ was related to emotion-recognition accuracy for the SCZ group but not for the ASD or TD groups. Further, only the ASD group failed to increase their visual attention to faces in incongruent emotional scenes, suggesting a lower reliance on facial information within ambiguous emotional contexts relative to congruent ones. Collectively, these findings highlight both shared and distinct social cognitive processes in SCZ and ASD that may contribute to their characteristic social disabilities.
尽管精神分裂症(SCZ)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)在情绪识别方面都存在缺陷,但这些缺陷背后的机制可能有所不同。当前的研究使用了新颖的“情境中的情绪”任务,来考察在SCZ和ASD中,面部表情的解读和视觉检查是如何受到一致和不一致情绪情境的调节的。当面部融入更广泛的情绪场景中时,与发育正常(TD)的对照组(n = 39)相比,患有SCZ的成年人(n = 44)和患有ASD的成年人(n = 21)都表现出情感识别能力下降,但当面部单独呈现时则不然,这突出了使用更接近现实世界情境的刺激的重要性。此外,与临床组相比,在一致的情绪场景中查看面部时,对照组对面部的准确性和视觉注意力提高得更多,这表明患有SCZ和ASD的个体可能不如对照组那样容易从互补的情绪信息中受益。尽管存在这些相似之处,但仍发现了SCZ和ASD之间的重要区别。在每种情况下,智商与SCZ组的情绪识别准确性相关,但与ASD组或TD组无关。此外,只有ASD组在不一致的情绪场景中未能增加对面部的视觉注意力,这表明相对于一致的情绪情境,在模糊的情绪情境中对面部信息的依赖程度较低。总的来说,这些发现突出了SCZ和ASD中共同和独特的社会认知过程,这些过程可能导致了它们典型的社会功能障碍。