Tseng Angela, Wang Zhishun, Huo Yuankai, Goh Suzanne, Russell James A, Peterson Bradley S
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Feb;37(2):443-61. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23041. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often have difficulty recognizing and interpreting facial expressions of emotion, which may impair their ability to navigate and communicate successfully in their social, interpersonal environments. Characterizing specific differences between individuals with ASD and their typically developing (TD) counterparts in the neural activity subserving their experience of emotional faces may provide distinct targets for ASD interventions. Thus we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and a parametric experimental design to identify brain regions in which neural activity correlated with ratings of arousal and valence for a broad range of emotional faces. Participants (51 ASD, 84 TD) were group-matched by age, sex, IQ, race, and socioeconomic status. Using task-related change in blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI signal as a measure, and covarying for age, sex, FSIQ, and ADOS scores, we detected significant differences across diagnostic groups in the neural activity subserving the dimension of arousal but not valence. BOLD-signal in TD participants correlated inversely with ratings of arousal in regions associated primarily with attentional functions, whereas BOLD-signal in ASD participants correlated positively with arousal ratings in regions commonly associated with impulse control and default-mode activity. Only minor differences were detected between groups in the BOLD signal correlates of valence ratings. Our findings provide unique insight into the emotional experiences of individuals with ASD. Although behavioral responses to face-stimuli were comparable across diagnostic groups, the corresponding neural activity for our ASD and TD groups differed dramatically. The near absence of group differences for valence correlates and the presence of strong group differences for arousal correlates suggest that individuals with ASD are not atypical in all aspects of emotion-processing. Studying these similarities and differences may help us to understand the origins of divergent interpersonal emotional experience in persons with ASD. Hum Brain Mapp 37:443-461, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体通常在识别和解读面部表情方面存在困难,这可能会损害他们在社交和人际环境中成功导航与沟通的能力。描绘ASD个体与其发育正常(TD)的同龄人在支持其对情绪面孔体验的神经活动方面的具体差异,可能为ASD干预提供不同的目标。因此,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和参数化实验设计来识别大脑区域,其中神经活动与广泛的情绪面孔的唤醒和效价评级相关。参与者(51名ASD,84名TD)在年龄、性别、智商、种族和社会经济地位方面进行了组间匹配。以与任务相关的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)fMRI信号变化作为测量指标,并对年龄、性别、全量表智商(FSIQ)和自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS)得分进行协变量分析,我们在支持唤醒维度而非效价维度的神经活动中检测到诊断组之间存在显著差异。TD参与者的BOLD信号与主要与注意力功能相关区域的唤醒评级呈负相关,而ASD参与者的BOLD信号与通常与冲动控制和默认模式活动相关区域的唤醒评级呈正相关。在效价评级的BOLD信号相关性方面,两组之间仅检测到微小差异。我们的研究结果为ASD个体的情绪体验提供了独特的见解。尽管不同诊断组对面部刺激的行为反应具有可比性,但我们的ASD组和TD组相应的神经活动却有显著差异。效价相关性几乎不存在组间差异,而唤醒相关性存在强烈组间差异,这表明ASD个体在情绪处理的所有方面并非都不典型。研究这些异同可能有助于我们理解ASD患者人际情绪体验差异的根源。《人类大脑图谱》37:443 - 461,2016年。© 2015威利期刊公司