School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen.
School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;27(1):64-74. doi: 10.1177/0956797615611933. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
In a series of related experiments, we asked people to choose whether to split their attention between two equally likely potential tasks or to prioritize one task at the expense of the other. In such a choice, when the tasks are easy, the best strategy is to prepare for both of them. As difficulty increases beyond the point at which people can perform both tasks accurately, they should switch strategy and focus on one task at the expense of the other. Across three very different tasks (target detection, throwing, and memory), none of the participants switched their strategy at the correct point. Moreover, the majority consistently failed to modify their strategy in response to changes in task difficulty. This failure may have been related to uncertainty about their own ability, because in a version of the experiment in which there was no uncertainty, participants uniformly switched at an optimal point.
在一系列相关实验中,我们要求人们在两项同等可能的潜在任务之间分配注意力,或者优先选择一项任务而牺牲另一项任务。在这种选择中,当任务很简单时,最佳策略是为两者都做好准备。当难度增加到人们无法准确完成两项任务的程度时,他们应该转换策略,专注于一项任务而牺牲另一项任务。在三个非常不同的任务(目标检测、投掷和记忆)中,没有一个参与者在正确的点上转换他们的策略。此外,大多数参与者始终未能根据任务难度的变化来调整他们的策略。这种失败可能与对自己能力的不确定性有关,因为在一个没有不确定性的实验版本中,参与者一致地在一个最佳点上进行了转换。