Lobo Neil F, St Laurent Brandyce, Sikaala Chadwick H, Hamainza Busiku, Chanda Javan, Chinula Dingani, Krishnankutty Sindhu M, Mueller Jonathan D, Deason Nicholas A, Hoang Quynh T, Boldt Heather L, Thumloup Julie, Stevenson Jennifer, Seyoum Aklilu, Collins Frank H
Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA 46556.
National Malaria Control Centre, Chainama Hospital College Grounds, Off Great East road, P.O. Box 32509, Lusaka, Zambia.
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 9;5:17952. doi: 10.1038/srep17952.
The understanding of malaria vector species in association with their bionomic traits is vital for targeting malaria interventions and measuring effectiveness. Many entomological studies rely on morphological identification of mosquitoes, limiting recognition to visually distinct species/species groups. Anopheles species assignments based on ribosomal DNA ITS2 and mitochondrial DNA COI were compared to morphological identifications from Luangwa and Nyimba districts in Zambia. The comparison of morphological and molecular identifications determined that interpretations of species compositions, insecticide resistance assays, host preference studies, trap efficacy, and Plasmodium infections were incorrect when using morphological identification alone. Morphological identifications recognized eight Anopheles species while 18 distinct sequence groups or species were identified from molecular analyses. Of these 18, seven could not be identified through comparison to published sequences. Twelve of 18 molecularly identified species (including unidentifiable species and species not thought to be vectors) were found by PCR to carry Plasmodium sporozoites - compared to four of eight morphological species. Up to 15% of morphologically identified Anopheles funestus mosquitoes in insecticide resistance tests were found to be other species molecularly. The comprehension of primary and secondary malaria vectors and bionomic characteristics that impact malaria transmission and intervention effectiveness are fundamental in achieving malaria elimination.
了解疟疾病媒种类及其生物学特性对于确定疟疾干预措施和衡量其有效性至关重要。许多昆虫学研究依赖于蚊子的形态学鉴定,这将识别范围限制在视觉上明显不同的物种/物种组。将基于核糖体DNA ITS2和线粒体DNA COI的按蚊种类鉴定结果与赞比亚卢安瓜区和尼姆巴区的形态学鉴定结果进行了比较。形态学鉴定与分子鉴定的比较表明,仅使用形态学鉴定时,物种组成、杀虫剂抗性检测、宿主偏好研究、诱捕效果和疟原虫感染的解释都是错误的。形态学鉴定识别出8种按蚊,而分子分析鉴定出18个不同的序列组或物种。在这18个中,有7个通过与已发表序列比较无法鉴定。通过PCR发现,18个分子鉴定物种中的12个(包括无法鉴定的物种和不被认为是病媒的物种)携带疟原虫子孢子,而形态学鉴定的8个物种中只有4个携带。在杀虫剂抗性测试中,形态学鉴定为嗜人按蚊的蚊子中,高达15%在分子水平上被发现是其他物种。了解主要和次要疟疾病媒以及影响疟疾传播和干预效果的生物学特性是实现消除疟疾的基础。