Das Smita, Henning Tyler C, Simubali Limonty, Hamapumbu Harry, Nzira Lukwa, Mamini Edmore, Makuwaza Aramu, Muleba Mbanga, Norris Douglas E, Stevenson Jennifer C
The W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Macha Research Trust, P.O. Box 630166, Choma, Zambia.
Malar J. 2015 Jan 21;14:12. doi: 10.1186/s12936-014-0527-9.
Defining the anopheline mosquito vectors and their foraging behaviour in malaria endemic areas is crucial for disease control and surveillance. The standard protocol for molecular identification of host blood meals in mosquitoes is to morphologically identify fed mosquitoes and then perform polymerase chain reaction (PCR), precipitin tests, or ELISA assays. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the feeding rate and human blood indices (HBIs) of malaria vectors were underestimated when molecular confirmation by PCR was performed on both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes.
In association with the Southern Africa International Centers of Excellence in Malaria Research (ICEMR), mosquito collections were performed at three sites: Choma district in southern Zambia, Nchelenge district in northern Zambia, and Mutasa district in eastern Zimbabwe. All anophelines were classified visually as fed or unfed, and tested for blood meal species using PCR methods. The HBIs of visually fed mosquitoes were compared to the HBIs of overall PCR confirmed fed mosquitoes by Pearson's Chi-Square Test of Independence.
The mosquito collections consisted of Anopheles arabiensis from Choma, Anopheles funestus s.s., Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles leesoni from Nchelenge, and An. funestus s.s. and An. leesoni from Mutasa. The malaria vectors at all three sites had large human blood indices (HBI) suggesting high anthropophily. When only visually fed mosquitoes tested by PCR for blood meal species were compared to testing those classified as both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes, it was found that the proportion blooded was underestimated by up to 18.7%. For most Anopheles species at each site, there was a statistically significant relationship (P < 0.05) between the HBIs of visually fed mosquitoes and that of the overall PCR confirmed fed mosquitoes.
The impact on HBI of analysing both visually fed and unfed mosquitoes varied from site to site. This discrepancy may be due to partial blood feeding behaviour by mosquitoes, digestion of blood meals, sample condition, and/or expertise of entomology field staff. It is important to perform molecular testing on all mosquitoes to accurately characterize vector feeding behaviour and develop interventions in malaria endemic areas.
确定疟疾流行地区的按蚊媒介及其觅食行为对于疾病控制和监测至关重要。分子鉴定蚊子体内宿主血餐的标准方案是先通过形态学鉴定已进食的蚊子,然后进行聚合酶链反应(PCR)、沉淀素试验或酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)分析。本研究的目的是确定当对视觉上已进食和未进食的蚊子都进行PCR分子确认时,疟疾媒介的摄食率和人类血液指数(HBI)被低估的程度。
与南部非洲疟疾研究国际卓越中心(ICEMR)合作,在三个地点进行蚊子采集:赞比亚南部的乔马区、赞比亚北部的恩泽伦格区和津巴布韦东部的穆塔萨区。所有按蚊在视觉上被分类为已进食或未进食,并使用PCR方法检测血餐种类。通过Pearson独立性卡方检验比较视觉上已进食蚊子的HBI与总体PCR确认已进食蚊子的HBI。
采集的蚊子包括来自乔马的阿拉伯按蚊、来自恩泽伦格的嗜人按蚊指名亚种、冈比亚按蚊指名亚种和李氏按蚊,以及来自穆塔萨的嗜人按蚊指名亚种和李氏按蚊。所有三个地点的疟疾媒介都有较高的人类血液指数(HBI),表明其嗜人性较高。当仅将通过PCR检测血餐种类的视觉上已进食蚊子与检测那些被分类为视觉上已进食和未进食的蚊子进行比较时,发现血液摄取比例被低估了高达18.7%。对于每个地点的大多数按蚊种类,视觉上已进食蚊子的HBI与总体PCR确认已进食蚊子的HBI之间存在统计学上的显著关系(P < 0.05)。
对视觉上已进食和未进食的蚊子进行分析对HBI的影响因地点而异。这种差异可能是由于蚊子的部分吸血行为、血餐的消化、样本状况和/或昆虫学现场工作人员的专业知识造成的。对所有蚊子进行分子检测对于准确描述媒介的摄食行为和在疟疾流行地区制定干预措施很重要。