Ben-Assa Eyal, Shacham Yacov, Shashar Moshe, Leshem-Rubinow Eran, Gal-Oz Amir, Schwartz Idit F, Schwartz Doron, Silverberg Donald S, Chernin Gil
Department of Cardiology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Department of Nephrology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Cardiorenal Med. 2015 Oct;5(4):246-53. doi: 10.1159/000433564. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
The treatment of anemia in patients with cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is based mainly on intravenous (IV) iron therapy and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). There are concerns about the safety of ESAs due to a potentially higher risk for stroke and malignancy.
We aimed to explore whether IV iron alone is sufficient to improve anemia in CRS patients and to define the predictors of treatment response.
We retrospectively analyzed data of 81 CRS patient treated for anemia at our clinic. All patients received IV iron for 6 weeks. A subset of patients was additionally given subcutaneous ESAs. The end point was the improvement from baseline in hemoglobin (Hb) and ferritin levels at week 7.
We retrieved the files of 81 patients; 34 received IV iron alone and 47 were given IV iron and ESAs (the combination group). The Hb levels significantly increased in both groups (in the IV iron alone group: 10.6 ± 1.1 to 11.9 ±1.1 g/dl, p < 0.001; in the combination group: 10.2 ± 0.9 to 12.4 ± 1.3 g/dl, p < 0.001), but more pronouncedly in the combination group (2.17 vs. 1.24 g/dl; p = 0.001). The platelet count decreased significantly in the IV iron alone group but was unchanged in the combination group. Eighty percent of patients attained a Hb target of 11 g/dl, with no significant difference between the two groups (73.5 vs. 85.1%; p = 0.197). Low baseline Hb was the only predictor of a favorable outcome to treatment.
Our observational study suggests that IV iron treatment without ESAs may substantially raise the Hb level to ≥11 g/dl in CRS patients. This treatment strategy may reduce the use of ESAs and hence its potential adverse effects.
心肾综合征(CRS)患者贫血的治疗主要基于静脉注射铁剂治疗和/或促红细胞生成素(ESAs)。由于存在中风和恶性肿瘤风险可能更高的问题,人们对ESAs的安全性有所担忧。
我们旨在探讨单纯静脉注射铁剂是否足以改善CRS患者的贫血状况,并确定治疗反应的预测因素。
我们回顾性分析了在我们诊所接受贫血治疗的81例CRS患者的数据。所有患者接受静脉注射铁剂治疗6周。部分患者还额外接受了皮下注射ESAs。终点指标是第7周时血红蛋白(Hb)和铁蛋白水平相对于基线的改善情况。
我们调取了81例患者的档案;34例仅接受静脉注射铁剂治疗,47例接受静脉注射铁剂加ESAs治疗(联合治疗组)。两组的Hb水平均显著升高(仅静脉注射铁剂组:从10.6±1.1 g/dl升至11.9±1.1 g/dl,p<0.001;联合治疗组:从10.2±0.9 g/dl升至12.4±1.3 g/dl,p<0.001),但联合治疗组升高更为明显(2.17 g/dl对1.24 g/dl;p = 0.001)。仅静脉注射铁剂组的血小板计数显著下降,而联合治疗组则无变化。80%的患者达到了11 g/dl的Hb目标,两组之间无显著差异(73.5%对85.1%;p = 0.197)。低基线Hb是治疗取得良好效果的唯一预测因素。
我们的观察性研究表明,在CRS患者中,不使用ESAs的静脉注射铁剂治疗可能会使Hb水平大幅提高至≥11 g/dl。这种治疗策略可能会减少ESAs的使用及其潜在的不良反应。