Lueken Ulrike, Hahn Tim
aDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, WürzburgbDepartment of Cognitive Psychology II, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;29(1):25-31. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000218.
The review provides an update of functional neuroimaging studies that identify neural processes underlying psychotherapy and predict outcomes following psychotherapeutic treatment in anxiety and depressive disorders. Following current developments in this field, studies were classified as 'mechanistic' or 'predictor' studies (i.e., informing neurobiological models about putative mechanisms versus aiming to provide predictive information).
Mechanistic evidence points toward a dual-process model of psychotherapy in anxiety disorders with abnormally increased limbic activation being decreased, while prefrontal activity is increased. Partly overlapping findings are reported for depression, albeit with a stronger focus on prefrontal activation following treatment. No studies directly comparing neural pathways of psychotherapy between anxiety and depression were detected. Consensus is accumulating for an overarching role of the anterior cingulate cortex in modulating treatment response across disorders. When aiming to quantify clinical utility, the need for single-subject predictions is increasingly recognized and predictions based on machine learning approaches show high translational potential.
Present findings encourage the search for predictors providing clinically meaningful information for single patients. However, independent validation as a crucial prerequisite for clinical use is still needed. Identifying nonresponders a priori creates the need for alternative treatment options that can be developed based on an improved understanding of those neural mechanisms underlying effective interventions.
本综述提供了功能神经影像学研究的最新进展,这些研究确定了心理治疗背后的神经过程,并预测了焦虑症和抑郁症患者接受心理治疗后的结果。根据该领域的当前发展情况,研究被分为“机制性”或“预测性”研究(即,为神经生物学模型提供关于假定机制的信息,与旨在提供预测性信息)。
机制性证据指向焦虑症心理治疗的双过程模型,即边缘系统异常增加的激活减少,而前额叶活动增加。抑郁症的研究结果部分重叠,尽管更侧重于治疗后前额叶的激活。未发现直接比较焦虑症和抑郁症心理治疗神经通路的研究。对于前扣带回皮质在调节跨疾病治疗反应中的总体作用,共识正在积累。在旨在量化临床效用时,越来越认识到对单病例预测的需求,基于机器学习方法的预测显示出很高的转化潜力。
目前的研究结果鼓励寻找能为个体患者提供具有临床意义信息的预测指标。然而,作为临床应用的关键前提,独立验证仍然是必要的。事先识别无反应者需要开发替代治疗方案,这可以基于对有效干预背后的神经机制的更好理解来进行。