Suppr超能文献

抑郁和焦虑的心理治疗反应的神经机制和预测因素的荟萃分析。

Meta-analyses of the neural mechanisms and predictors of response to psychotherapy in depression and anxiety.

机构信息

Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, UK; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Dec;95:61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Sep 29.

Abstract

Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying psychological therapy could aid understanding of recovery processes and help target treatments. The dual-process model hypothesises that psychological therapy is associated with increased emotional-regulation in prefrontal brain regions and decreased implicit emotional-reactivity in limbic regions; however, research has yielded inconsistent findings. Meta-analyses of brain activity changes accompanying psychological therapy (22 studies, n = 352) and neural predictors of symptomatic improvement (11 studies, n = 293) in depression and anxiety were conducted using seed-based d mapping. Both resting-state and task-based studies were included, and analysed together and separately. The most robust findings were significant decreases in anterior cingulate/paracingulate gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus and insula activation after therapy. Cuneus activation was predictive of subsequent symptom change. The results are in agreement with neural models of improved emotional-reactivity following therapy as evidenced by decreased activity within the anterior cingulate and insula. We propose compensatory as well as corrective neural mechanisms of action underlie therapeutic efficacy, and suggest the dual-process model may be too simplistic to account fully for treatment mechanisms. More research on predictors of psychotherapeutic response is required to provide reliable predictors of response.

摘要

了解心理治疗的神经机制可以帮助我们理解康复过程,并有助于确定治疗目标。双加工模型假设,心理治疗与前额叶脑区的情绪调节增加和边缘区域的内隐情绪反应减少有关;然而,研究结果并不一致。我们对抑郁症和焦虑症中与心理治疗相关的脑活动变化(22 项研究,n=352)和症状改善的神经预测因子(11 项研究,n=293)进行了基于种子的 d 映射元分析。包括静息态和任务态研究,并进行了联合和单独分析。最可靠的发现是治疗后前扣带回/旁扣带回、下额回和脑岛的激活显著减少。楔前叶的激活可预测随后的症状变化。这些结果与治疗后情绪反应改善的神经模型一致,表现为前扣带回和脑岛的活动减少。我们提出治疗效果的作用机制既有代偿性的,也有纠正性的,并认为双加工模型可能过于简单,无法充分解释治疗机制。需要更多关于心理治疗反应预测因子的研究,以提供反应的可靠预测因子。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2aa/6267850/b9cf0838d551/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验