使用在线戒烟社区可促进戒烟:倾向得分加权结果
Use of an online smoking cessation community promotes abstinence: Results of propensity score weighting.
作者信息
Graham Amanda L, Papandonatos George D, Erar Bahar, Stanton Cassandra A
机构信息
Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, American Legacy Foundation.
Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University.
出版信息
Health Psychol. 2015 Dec;34S(0):1286-95. doi: 10.1037/hea0000278.
OBJECTIVE
We estimated the causal effects of use of an online smoking cessation community on 30-day point prevalence abstinence at 3 months.
METHODS
Participants (N = 492) were adult current smokers in the enhanced Internet arm of The iQUITT Study, a randomized trial of Internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. All participants accessed a Web-based smoking-cessation program that included a large, established online community. Automated tracking metrics of passive (e.g., reading forum posts, viewing member profiles) and active (e.g., writing forum posts, sending private messages) community use were extracted from the site at 3 months. Self-selected community use defines the groups of interest: "None," "Passive," and "Both" (passive + active). Inverse probability of treatment weighting corrected for baseline imbalances on demographic, smoking, psychosocial, and medical history variables. Propensity weights estimated via generalized boosted models were used to calculate Average Treatment Effects (ATE) and Average Treatment effects on the Treated (ATT).
RESULTS
Patterns of community use were: None = 198 (40.2%), Passive = 110 (22.4%), and Both = 184 (37.4%). ATE-weighted abstinence rates were: None = 4.2% (95% CI = 1.5-6.9); Passive = 15.1% (95% CI = 8.4-21.9); Both = 20.4% (95% CI = 13.9-26.8). ATT-weighted abstinence rates indicated even greater benefits of community use.
CONCLUSIONS
Community users were more likely to quit smoking at 3 months than nonusers. The estimated benefit from use of online community resources was even larger among subjects with high propensity to use them. No differences in abstinence emerged between passive and passive/active users. Results suggest that lurking in online communities confers specific abstinence benefits. Implications of these findings for online cessation communities are discussed.
目的
我们评估了使用在线戒烟社区对3个月时30天点患病率戒烟率的因果效应。
方法
参与者(N = 492)是“iQUITT研究”强化互联网组中的成年现吸烟者,该研究是一项关于互联网和电话戒烟治疗的随机试验。所有参与者都访问了一个基于网络的戒烟项目,其中包括一个大型的、成熟的在线社区。在3个月时从网站提取被动(例如,阅读论坛帖子、查看成员资料)和主动(例如,撰写论坛帖子、发送私人消息)社区使用的自动跟踪指标。自我选择的社区使用情况定义了感兴趣的组:“无”、“被动”和“两者皆有”(被动+主动)。治疗权重的逆概率校正了人口统计学、吸烟、心理社会和病史变量的基线不平衡。通过广义增强模型估计的倾向权重用于计算平均治疗效果(ATE)和对治疗组的平均治疗效果(ATT)。
结果
社区使用模式为:无=198(40.2%),被动=110(22.4%),两者皆有=184(37.4%)。ATE加权戒烟率为:无=4.2%(95%CI = 1.5 - 6.9);被动=15.1%(95%CI = 8.4 - 21.9);两者皆有=20.4%(95%CI = 13.9 - 26.8)。ATT加权戒烟率表明社区使用的益处更大。
结论
社区使用者在3个月时比非使用者更有可能戒烟。在使用在线社区资源倾向较高的受试者中,使用在线社区资源的估计益处更大。被动使用者和被动/主动使用者之间的戒烟率没有差异。结果表明,潜伏在在线社区能带来特定的戒烟益处。讨论了这些发现对在线戒烟社区的影响。