• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用戒烟信息、互动和在线社区资源作为戒烟预测因素:队列研究。

Utilization of smoking cessation informational, interactive, and online community resources as predictors of abstinence: cohort study.

作者信息

An Lawrence C, Schillo Barbara A, Saul Jessie E, Wendling Ann H, Klatt Colleen M, Berg Carla J, Ahulwalia Jasjit S, Kavanaugh Annette M, Christenson Matthew, Luxenberg Michael G

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2008 Dec 20;10(5):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1018.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.1018
PMID:19103587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2630836/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The association between greater utilization of Web-assisted tobacco interventions and increased abstinence rates is well recognized. However, there is little information on how utilization of specific website features influences quitting.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between utilization of informational, interactive, and online community resources (eg. bulletin boards) and abstinence rates, with the broader objective to identify potential strategies for improving outcomes for Web-assisted tobacco interventions.

METHODS

In Spring 2004, a cohort of 607 quitplan.com users consented to participate in an evaluation of quitplan.com, a Minnesota branded version of QuitNet.com. We developed utilization measures for different site features: general information, interactive diagnostic tools and quit planning tools, online expert counseling, passive (ie, reading of bulletin boards) and active (ie, public posting) online community engagement, and one-to-one messaging with other virtual community members. Using bivariate, multivariate, and path analyses, we examined the relationship between utilization of specific site features and 30-day abstinence at 6 months.

RESULTS

The most commonly used resources were the interactive quit planning tools (used by 77% of site users). Other informational resources (ie, quitting guides) were used more commonly (60% of users) than passive (38%) or active (24%) community features. Online community engagement through one-to-one messaging was low (11%) as was use of online counseling (5%). The 30-day abstinence rate among study participants at 6 months was 9.7% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 7.3% - 12.1%). In the logistic regression model, neither the demographic data (eg, age, gender, education level, employment, or insurance status) nor the smoking-related data (eg, cigarettes per day, time to first morning cigarette, baseline readiness to quit) nor use of smoking cessation medications entered the model as significant predictors of abstinence. Individuals who used the interactive quit planning tools once, two to three times, or four or more times had an odds of abstinence of 0.65 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.22 - 1.94), 1.87 (95% CI 0.77 - 4.56), and 2.35 (95% CI 1.0 - 5.58), respectively. The use of one-to-one messages (reference = none vs 1 or more) entered the final model as potential predictor for abstinence, though the significance of this measure was marginal (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 0.92 - 3.97, P = .083). In the path analysis, an apparent association between active online community engagement and abstinence was accounted for in large part by increased use of interactive quitting tools and one-to-one messaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of interactive quitting tools, and perhaps one-to-one messaging with other members of the online community, was associated with increased abstinence rates among quitplan.com users. Designs that facilitate use of these features should be considered.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca14/2630836/02b3db043b69/jmir_v10i5e55_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca14/2630836/02b3db043b69/jmir_v10i5e55_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca14/2630836/02b3db043b69/jmir_v10i5e55_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

网络辅助烟草干预措施的更多使用与戒断率提高之间的关联已得到充分认可。然而,关于特定网站功能的使用如何影响戒烟的信息却很少。

目的

确定信息、互动和在线社区资源(如公告栏)的使用与戒断率之间的关联,更广泛的目标是确定改善网络辅助烟草干预效果的潜在策略。

方法

2004年春季,607名quitplan.com用户组成的队列同意参与对quitplan.com(明尼苏达州版的QuitNet.com)的评估。我们针对不同的网站功能制定了使用指标:一般信息、互动诊断工具和戒烟计划工具、在线专家咨询、被动(即阅读公告栏)和主动(即公开发帖)在线社区参与,以及与其他虚拟社区成员进行一对一消息传递。我们使用双变量、多变量和路径分析,研究特定网站功能的使用与6个月时30天戒断情况之间的关系。

结果

最常用的资源是互动戒烟计划工具(77%的网站用户使用)。其他信息资源(即戒烟指南)的使用比被动(38%)或主动(24%)社区功能更为普遍(60%的用户使用)。通过一对一消息传递进行的在线社区参与度较低(11%),在线咨询的使用率也较低(5%)。6个月时研究参与者的30天戒断率为9.7%(95%置信区间[CI]7.3% - 12.1%)。在逻辑回归模型中,人口统计学数据(如年龄、性别、教育水平、就业或保险状况)、与吸烟相关的数据(如每天吸烟量、起床后第一支烟的时间、基线戒烟意愿)以及戒烟药物的使用均未作为戒断的显著预测因素进入模型。使用互动戒烟计划工具一次、两到三次或四次及以上的个体,戒断几率分别为0.65(95%置信区间[CI]0.22 - 1.94)、1.87(95%CI 0.77 - 4.56)和2.35(95%CI 1.0 - 5.58)。一对一消息传递的使用(参考 = 无与1次或更多次)作为戒断的潜在预测因素进入最终模型,尽管该指标的显著性很微弱(OR = 1.91,95%CI 0.92 - 3.97,P = 0.083)。在路径分析中,主动在线社区参与与戒断之间的明显关联在很大程度上是由互动戒烟工具和一对一消息传递使用的增加所解释的。

结论

互动戒烟工具的使用,或许还有与在线社区其他成员的一对一消息传递,与quitplan.com用户戒断率提高相关联。应考虑设计便于使用这些功能的方案。

相似文献

1
Utilization of smoking cessation informational, interactive, and online community resources as predictors of abstinence: cohort study.利用戒烟信息、互动和在线社区资源作为戒烟预测因素:队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Dec 20;10(5):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1018.
2
Effect of adding a virtual community (bulletin board) to smokefree.gov: randomized controlled trial.在无烟.gov网站添加虚拟社区(公告栏)的效果:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Dec 19;10(5):e53. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1124.
3
Quit now? Quit soon? Quit when you're ready? Insights about target quit dates for smoking cessation from an online quit date tool.现在戒烟?尽快戒烟?准备好时再戒烟?来自在线戒烟日期工具的关于戒烟目标日期的见解。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 17;16(2):e55. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3086.
4
Engagement promotes abstinence in a web-based cessation intervention: cohort study.参与在基于网络的戒烟干预中促进戒烟:队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 28;15(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2277.
5
Internet and Telephone Treatment for smoking cessation: mediators and moderators of short-term abstinence.互联网和电话戒烟治疗:短期戒烟的中介因素和调节因素
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Mar;17(3):299-308. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu144. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
6
Phone and web-based tobacco cessation treatment: real-world utilization patterns and outcomes for 11,000 tobacco users.基于电话和网络的戒烟治疗:11000名烟草使用者的实际使用模式和结果
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 14;10(5):e41. doi: 10.2196/jmir.999.
7
Increasing reach by offering choices: Results from an innovative model for statewide services for smoking cessation.通过提供选择来扩大覆盖面:一项针对全州戒烟服务的创新模式的成果
Prev Med. 2016 Oct;91:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
8
A review of web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATIs).网络辅助烟草干预措施综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 6;10(5):e39. doi: 10.2196/jmir.989.
9
Comparing internet assistance for smoking cessation: 13-month follow-up of a six-arm randomized controlled trial.比较戒烟的互联网辅助手段:一项六臂随机对照试验的13个月随访
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 21;10(5):e45. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1008.
10
Development of a Twitter-based intervention for smoking cessation that encourages high-quality social media interactions via automessages.开发一种基于推特的戒烟干预措施,通过自动消息鼓励高质量的社交媒体互动。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 23;17(2):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3772.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization and Experiences of Using Quit Now, a Nicotine and Tobacco Smoking Cessation Website: Thematic Analysis.使用戒烟网站“立即戒烟”的情况与体验:主题分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 4;27:e55592. doi: 10.2196/55592.
2
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Comprehensive Smoking-Cessation Interventions Based on the Community and Hospital Collaboration.基于社区-医院协作的综合性戒烟干预措施的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:853438. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.853438. eCollection 2022.
3
Spread of gambling abstinence through peers and comments in online self-help chat forums to quit gambling.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a statewide Internet-based tobacco cessation intervention.一项基于互联网的全州范围戒烟干预措施的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Sep 30;9(3):e28. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.4.e28.
2
American Cancer Society's QuitLink: randomized trial of Internet assistance.美国癌症协会的戒烟热线:互联网辅助的随机试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Mar;9(3):415-20. doi: 10.1080/14622200701188877.
3
Defining participant exposure measures in Web-based health behavior change programs.定义基于网络的健康行为改变项目中的参与者暴露测量指标。
通过在线互助聊天论坛中的同伴和评论来传播戒赌。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07714-2.
4
Feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and accessibility of a twitter-based social support group vs Fitbit only to decrease sedentary behavior in women.基于推特的社交支持小组与仅使用Fitbit相比,在减少女性久坐行为方面的可行性、初步疗效和可及性。
Internet Interv. 2021 Jul 6;25:100426. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100426. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Exploring the barriers of patients with diabetic foot complications in China: a qualitative interview study.探索中国糖尿病足并发症患者面临的障碍:一项定性访谈研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(9):792. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7569.
6
Twitter-Based Social Support Added to Fitbit Self-Monitoring for Decreasing Sedentary Behavior: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial With Female Patients From a Women's Heart Clinic.基于推特的社会支持添加到Fitbit自我监测中以减少久坐行为:一项针对女性心脏诊所女性患者的随机对照试验性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 4;9(12):e20926. doi: 10.2196/20926.
7
The Use of Web-Based Support Groups Versus Usual Quit-Smoking Care for Men and Women Aged 21-59 Years: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.21至59岁男性和女性使用基于网络的支持小组与常规戒烟护理的比较:一项随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 14;9(1):e16417. doi: 10.2196/16417.
8
Comparing Treatment Acceptability and 12-Month Cessation Rates in Response to Web-Based Smoking Interventions Among Smokers Who Do and Do Not Screen Positive for Affective Disorders: Secondary Analysis.比较在有和没有情感障碍筛查呈阳性的吸烟者中,基于网络的吸烟干预措施的治疗可接受性和12个月戒烟率:二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 19;21(6):e13500. doi: 10.2196/13500.
9
Perceptions of Alternative Tobacco Products, Anti-tobacco Media, and Tobacco Regulation among Young Adults: A Qualitative Study.青少年对新型烟草制品、反烟草媒体及烟草管制的认知:一项定性研究
Am J Health Behav. 2018 Jul 1;42(4):118-130. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.42.4.11.
10
Peer-Based Social Media Features in Behavior Change Interventions: Systematic Review.行为改变干预中基于同伴的社交媒体功能:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 22;20(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8342.
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Aug 30;8(3):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e15.
4
Toward evidence-based Internet interventions: A Spanish/English Web site for international smoking cessation trials.迈向基于证据的互联网干预措施:一个用于国际戒烟试验的西班牙语/英语网站。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Feb;8(1):77-87. doi: 10.1080/14622200500431940.
5
A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme.一项基于互联网的全自动戒烟计划的随机对照研究。
Tob Control. 2006 Feb;15(1):7-12. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.006189.
6
Initial evaluation of a real-world Internet smoking cessation system.一个真实世界的互联网戒烟系统的初步评估。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Apr;7(2):207-16. doi: 10.1080/14622200500055319.
7
Self-help interventions for smoking cessation.戒烟的自助干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD001118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001118.pub2.
8
Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy.一项基于网络的计算机定制戒烟计划作为尼古丁贴片疗法补充的随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2005 May;100(5):682-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01093.x.
9
Comparing the efficacy of two Internet-based, computer-tailored smoking cessation programs: a randomized trial.比较两种基于互联网的、计算机定制的戒烟方案的疗效:一项随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 8;7(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e2.
10
Smoking cessation treatment on the Internet: content, quality, and usability.互联网上的戒烟治疗:内容、质量和可用性。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Apr;6(2):207-19. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001676332.