• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

戒烟社交网络中的超级用户:对加拿大癌症协会吸烟者帮助热线在线平台和戒烟中心网的人口统计学特征及发帖行为的分析

Superusers in social networks for smoking cessation: analysis of demographic characteristics and posting behavior from the Canadian Cancer Society's smokers' helpline online and StopSmokingCenter.net.

作者信息

van Mierlo Trevor, Voci Sabrina, Lee Sharon, Fournier Rachel, Selby Peter

机构信息

Evolution Health Systems Inc, San Francisco, CA 94103, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 26;14(3):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1854.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.1854
PMID:22732103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3414904/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online social networks are popular components of behavior-change websites. Research has identified the participation of certain network members who assume leadership roles by providing support, advice, and direction to other members. In the literature, these individuals have been variously defined as key players, posters, active users, or caretakers. Despite their identification, very little research has been conducted on the contributions or demographic characteristics of this population. For this study, we collectively categorized key players, posters, active users, and caretakers as superusers.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze data from two large but distinct Web-assisted tobacco interventions (WATI) to help gain insight into superuser demographic characteristics and how they use social networks.

METHODS

We extracted cross-sectional data sets containing posting behaviors and demographic characteristics from a free, publicly funded program (the Canadian Cancer Society's Smokers' Helpline Online: SHO), and a free, privately run program (StopSmokingCenter.net: SSC).

RESULTS

Within the reporting period (SHO: June 26, 2008 to October 12, 2010; SSC: May 17, 2007 to October 12, 2010), 21,128 individuals registered for the SHO and 11,418 registered for the SSC. Within the same period, 1670 (7.90%) registrants made at least one post in the SHO social network, and 1627 (14.25%) registrants made at least one post in the SSC social network. SHO and SSC superusers accounted for 0.4% (n = 95) and 1.1% (n = 124) of all registrants, and 5.7% (95/1670) and 7.62% (124/1627) of all social network participants, and contributed to 34.78% (29,422/84,599) and 46.22% (61,820/133,753) of social network content, respectively. Despite vast differences in promotion and group management rules, and contrary to the beliefs of group moderators, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two superuser groups.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study that compared demographic characteristics and posting behavior from two separate eHealth social networks. Despite vast differences in promotional efforts and management styles, both WATI attracted superusers with similar characteristics. As superusers drive network traffic, organizations promoting or supporting WATI should dedicate resources to encourage superuser participation. Further research regarding member dynamics and optimization of social networks for health care purposes is required.

摘要

背景

在线社交网络是行为改变类网站的常见组成部分。研究发现,某些网络成员会通过为其他成员提供支持、建议和指导来发挥领导作用。在文献中,这些人被分别定义为关键参与者、发帖者、活跃用户或管理员。尽管已识别出这些人,但针对该群体的贡献或人口统计学特征的研究却很少。在本研究中,我们将关键参与者、发帖者、活跃用户和管理员统称为超级用户。

目的

分析来自两项大型但不同的网络辅助烟草干预(WATI)的数据,以深入了解超级用户的人口统计学特征以及他们如何使用社交网络。

方法

我们从一个免费的公共资助项目(加拿大癌症协会的在线戒烟热线:SHO)和一个免费的私人运营项目(StopSmokingCenter.net:SSC)中提取了包含发帖行为和人口统计学特征的横断面数据集。

结果

在报告期内(SHO:2008年6月26日至2010年10月12日;SSC:2007年5月17日至2010年10月12日),21128人注册了SHO,11418人注册了SSC。在同一时期,1670名(7.90%)注册者在SHO社交网络中至少发布了一篇帖子,1627名(14.25%)注册者在SSC社交网络中至少发布了一篇帖子。SHO和SSC的超级用户分别占所有注册者的0.4%(n = 95)和1.1%(n = 124),占所有社交网络参与者的5.7%(95/1670)和7.62%(124/1627),分别贡献了社交网络内容的34.78%(29422/84599)和

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/3d17b90a7ec9/jmir_v14i3e66_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/ba03acc9a584/jmir_v14i3e66_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/4e21eb744fe1/jmir_v14i3e66_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/277243e96326/jmir_v14i3e66_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/c36d534e1c85/jmir_v14i3e66_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/560a6ece500d/jmir_v14i3e66_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/3d17b90a7ec9/jmir_v14i3e66_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/ba03acc9a584/jmir_v14i3e66_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/4e21eb744fe1/jmir_v14i3e66_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/277243e96326/jmir_v14i3e66_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/c36d534e1c85/jmir_v14i3e66_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/560a6ece500d/jmir_v14i3e66_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56a5/3414904/3d17b90a7ec9/jmir_v14i3e66_fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Superusers in social networks for smoking cessation: analysis of demographic characteristics and posting behavior from the Canadian Cancer Society's smokers' helpline online and StopSmokingCenter.net.戒烟社交网络中的超级用户:对加拿大癌症协会吸烟者帮助热线在线平台和戒烟中心网的人口统计学特征及发帖行为的分析
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 26;14(3):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1854.
2
Online social and professional support for smokers trying to quit: an exploration of first time posts from 2562 members.为试图戒烟的吸烟者提供的在线社交和专业支持:对2562名成员首次发布内容的探索
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Aug 18;12(3):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1340.
3
How Online Communities of People With Long-Term Conditions Function and Evolve: Network Analysis of the Structure and Dynamics of the Asthma UK and British Lung Foundation Online Communities.患有长期疾病的人群在线社区如何运作与演变:对英国哮喘与英国肺脏基金会在线社区的结构和动态的网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 11;20(7):e238. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9952.
4
Demographic and Indication-Specific Characteristics Have Limited Association With Social Network Engagement: Evidence From 24,954 Members of Four Health Care Support Groups.人口统计学特征和特定适应症特征与社交网络参与度的关联有限:来自四个医疗保健支持小组24954名成员的证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e40. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6330.
5
Superusers' Engagement in Asthma Online Communities: Asynchronous Web-Based Interview Study.超级用户参与哮喘在线社区:基于网络的异步访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e18185. doi: 10.2196/18185.
6
The 1% rule in four digital health social networks: an observational study.四个数字健康社交网络中的1%规则:一项观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 4;16(2):e33. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2966.
7
A prospective examination of online social network dynamics and smoking cessation.在线社交网络动态与戒烟的前瞻性研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0183655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183655. eCollection 2017.
8
Evaluating the QUIT-PRIMO clinical practice ePortal to increase smoker engagement with online cessation interventions: a national hybrid type 2 implementation study.评估QUIT-PRIMO临床实践电子平台以提高吸烟者对在线戒烟干预措施的参与度:一项全国性混合2型实施研究。
Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 2;10:154. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0336-8.
9
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications.数字健康社交网络中的幂律分布映射:方法、解读及实际意义
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 25;17(6):e160. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4297.
10
Integrated online services for smokers and drinkers? Use of the check your drinking assessment screener by participants of the Stop Smoking Center.为吸烟者和饮酒者提供的综合在线服务?戒烟中心参与者对饮酒评估筛查工具的使用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8 Suppl 1:S21-5. doi: 10.1080/14622200601039865.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Behavioral Phenotyping Layer for Artificial Intelligence-Driven Predictive Analytics in a Digital Resiliency Course: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.为数字适应能力课程中人工智能驱动的预测分析开发行为表型分析层:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 6;14:e73773. doi: 10.2196/73773.
2
Trouble with the curve: the 90-9-1 rule to measure volitional participation inequalities among Royal Canadian Mounted Police cadets during training.曲线问题:用90-9-1规则衡量加拿大皇家骑警学员训练期间的自愿参与不平等情况。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 28;15:1297953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1297953. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Internet skills performance tests: are people ready for eHealth?互联网技能性能测试:人们是否为电子健康做好准备?
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Apr 29;13(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1581.
2
Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions.支持性问责制:一种提供人力支持以增强对电子健康干预措施依从性的模式。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Mar 10;13(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1602.
3
Using metrics to describe the participative stances of members within discussion forums.使用指标来描述讨论论坛中成员的参与立场。
Theory-Based Social and Non-Social Engagement Features in Smoking Cessation Mobile Apps: A Content Analysis.
基于理论的戒烟移动应用程序中的社会和非社会参与特征:内容分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 29;18(17):9106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179106.
4
Superusers' Engagement in Asthma Online Communities: Asynchronous Web-Based Interview Study.超级用户参与哮喘在线社区:基于网络的异步访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 23;22(6):e18185. doi: 10.2196/18185.
5
Effectiveness of WhatsApp online group discussion for smoking relapse prevention: protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.基于 WhatsApp 的线上群组讨论预防复吸有效性的随机对照试验研究方案
Addiction. 2020 Sep;115(9):1777-1785. doi: 10.1111/add.15027. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Mining User-Generated Content in an Online Smoking Cessation Community to Identify Smoking Status: A Machine Learning Approach.利用机器学习方法挖掘在线戒烟社区中的用户生成内容以识别吸烟状况
Decis Support Syst. 2019 Jan;116:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
7
Weekly enrollment and usage patterns in an Internet smoking cessation intervention.一项互联网戒烟干预措施中的每周注册及使用模式。
Internet Interv. 2017 Jul 28;9:100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.07.004. eCollection 2017 Sep.
8
Engagement and attrition in Internet smoking cessation interventions: Insights from a cross-sectional survey of "one-hit-wonders".互联网戒烟干预中的参与度与退出率:对“昙花一现者”横断面调查的见解
Internet Interv. 2016 Jul 7;5:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2016.07.001. eCollection 2016 Sep.
9
How Online Communities of People With Long-Term Conditions Function and Evolve: Network Analysis of the Structure and Dynamics of the Asthma UK and British Lung Foundation Online Communities.患有长期疾病的人群在线社区如何运作与演变:对英国哮喘与英国肺脏基金会在线社区的结构和动态的网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 11;20(7):e238. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9952.
10
Exposure to positive peer sentiment about nicotine replacement therapy in an online smoking cessation community is associated with NRT use.在一个在线戒烟社区中,接触到关于尼古丁替代疗法的积极同伴意见与 NRT 的使用有关。
Addict Behav. 2018 Dec;87:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 10;13(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1591.
4
Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged >or=18 years --- United States, 2009.生命体征:2009 年美国 18 岁及以上成年人当前吸烟状况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Sep 10;59(35):1135-40.
5
Online social and professional support for smokers trying to quit: an exploration of first time posts from 2562 members.为试图戒烟的吸烟者提供的在线社交和专业支持:对2562名成员首次发布内容的探索
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Aug 18;12(3):e34. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1340.
6
Beacon: a web portal to high-quality mental health websites for use by health professionals and the public.信标:一个为卫生专业人员和公众提供高质量心理健康网站的网络门户。
Med J Aust. 2010 Jun 7;192(S11):S40-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03692.x.
7
Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation.大型在线戒烟社区的社交网络结构。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1282-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165449. Epub 2010 May 13.
8
Utilization patterns and user characteristics of an ad libitum Internet weight loss program.一项随意访问的互联网减肥计划的使用模式和用户特征。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Mar 29;12(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1347.
9
A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention for alcohol abusers.一项基于互联网的干预措施治疗酒精滥用者的随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2009 Dec;104(12):2023-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02726.x.
10
Effects of Web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于网络和计算机的戒烟项目的效果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):929-37. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.109.