Driessen C M L, de Boer J P, Gelderblom H, Rasch C R N, de Jong M A, Verbist B M, Melchers W J G, Tesselaar M E T, van der Graaf W T A, Kaanders J H A M, van Herpen C M L
Departments of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, PO Box 9191, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jan;52:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
To study the feasibility of induction chemotherapy added to concomitant cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC).
LAHNC patients were treated with 4 courses of docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by randomization to either cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) with conventional radiotherapy (cis100 + RT) or cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) weekly with accelerated radiotherapy (cis40 + ART). Primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as receiving ≥ 90% of the scheduled total radiation dose. Based on power analysis 70 patients were needed.
65 patients were enrolled. The data safety monitoring board advised to prematurely terminate the study, because only 22% and 41% (32% in total) of the patients treated with cis100 + RT (n = 27) and cis40 + ART (n = 29) could receive the planned dose cisplatin during CRT, respectively, even though the primary endpoint was reached. Most common grade 3-4 toxicity was febrile neutropenia (18%) during TPF and dehydration (26% vs 14%), dysphagia (26% vs 24%) and mucositis (22% vs 57%) during cis100 + RT and cis40 + ART, respectively. For the patients treated with cis100 + RT and cis40 + ART, two years progression free survival and overall survival were 70% and 78% versus 72% and 79%, respectively.
After TPF induction chemotherapy, cisplatin-containing CRT is not feasible in LAHNC patients, because the total planned cisplatin dose could only be administered in 32% of the patients due to toxicity. However, all but 2 patients received more than 90% of the planned radiotherapy. Clinical Trials Information: NCT00774319.
研究诱导化疗联合基于顺铂的同步放化疗(CRT)用于局部晚期头颈癌(LAHNC)患者的可行性。
LAHNC患者接受4个疗程的多西他赛/顺铂/5-氟尿嘧啶(TPF)治疗,随后随机分为接受100mg/m²顺铂联合传统放疗(顺铂100+RT)或每周40mg/m²顺铂联合加速放疗(顺铂40+ART)。主要终点为可行性,定义为接受≥90%的预定总辐射剂量。根据效能分析,需要70例患者。
65例患者入组。数据安全监测委员会建议提前终止研究,因为接受顺铂100+RT(n=27)和顺铂40+ART(n=29)治疗的患者中,分别仅有22%和41%(总计32%)在CRT期间能够接受计划剂量的顺铂,尽管达到了主要终点。最常见的3-4级毒性反应分别为TPF治疗期间的发热性中性粒细胞减少(18%),以及顺铂100+RT和顺铂40+ART治疗期间的脱水(分别为26%对14%)、吞咽困难(分别为26%对24%)和黏膜炎(分别为22%对57%)。接受顺铂100+RT和顺铂40+ART治疗的患者,两年无进展生存率和总生存率分别为70%和78%以及72%和79%。
在TPF诱导化疗后,含顺铂的CRT用于LAHNC患者不可行,因为由于毒性,仅32%的患者能够接受计划的顺铂总剂量。然而,除2例患者外,所有患者均接受了超过90%的计划放疗。临床试验信息:NCT00774319。