Kubant R, Poon A N, Sánchez-Hernández D, Domenichiello A F, Huot P S P, Pannia E, Cho C E, Hunschede S, Bazinet R P, Anderson G H
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nutr Diabetes. 2015 Dec 14;5(12):e188. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2015.40.
Obesity is associated with increased consumption and preference for dietary fat. Experimental models of fat-induced obesity use either lard or vegetable shortening. Yet, there are no direct comparisons of these commonly used fat sources, or the influence of their fatty acid composition, on the development of diet-induced obesity.
To compare the effects of lard and hydrogenated vegetable-shortening diets, which differ in their fatty acid composition, on weight gain and the development of obesity and insulin resistance in rats.
Male Wistar rats were fed ad libitum for 14 weeks high-fat diets containing either (1) high vegetable fat (HVF, 60 kcal% from vegetable shortening) or (2) high lard fat (HLF, 60 kcal% from lard). Rats fed normal-fat (NF, 16 kcal% from vegetable shortening) diet served as control. Body weight, food intake, adipose tissue mass, serum 25[OH]D3, glucose, insulin and fatty acid composition of diets were measured.
Rats fed either of the two high-fat diets had higher energy intake, weight gain and fat accretion than rats fed normal-fat diet. However, rats fed the HLF diet consumed more calories and gained more weight and body fat with greater increases of 32% in total (158.5±8.2 vs 120.2±6.6 g, P<0.05), 30% in visceral (104.4±5.2 vs 80.3±4.2 g, P<0.05) and 36% in subcutaneous fat mass (54.1±3.6 vs 39.9±3.1 g, P<0.05), compared with rats fed the HVF diet. Higher visceral adiposity was positively correlated with serum insulin (r=0.376, P<0.05) and homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (r=0.391, P<0.05).
We conclude that lard-based high-fat diets accentuate the increase in weight gain and the development of obesity and insulin resistance more than hydrogenated vegetable-shortening diets. These results further point to the importance of standardizing fatty acid composition and type of fat used in determining outcomes of consuming high-fat diets.
肥胖与膳食脂肪的摄入量增加及偏好有关。脂肪诱导肥胖的实验模型使用猪油或植物起酥油。然而,对于这些常用脂肪来源及其脂肪酸组成对饮食诱导肥胖发展的影响,尚无直接比较。
比较脂肪酸组成不同的猪油和氢化植物起酥油饮食对大鼠体重增加、肥胖及胰岛素抵抗发展的影响。
雄性Wistar大鼠随意进食含以下成分的高脂饮食14周:(1) 高植物脂肪(HVF,60%千卡热量来自植物起酥油)或(2) 高猪油脂肪(HLF,60%千卡热量来自猪油)。喂食正常脂肪(NF,16%千卡热量来自植物起酥油)饮食的大鼠作为对照。测量体重、食物摄入量、脂肪组织质量、血清25[OH]D3、葡萄糖、胰岛素及饮食的脂肪酸组成。
喂食两种高脂饮食之一的大鼠比喂食正常脂肪饮食的大鼠能量摄入、体重增加和脂肪蓄积更高。然而,与喂食HVF饮食的大鼠相比,喂食HLF饮食的大鼠消耗更多热量,体重和体脂增加更多,总量增加32%(158.5±8.2对120.2±6.6克,P<0.05),内脏脂肪增加30%(104.4±5.2对80.3±4.2克,P<0.05),皮下脂肪质量增加36%(54.1±3.6对39.9±3.1克,P<0.05)。更高的内脏脂肪与血清胰岛素(r=0.376,P<0.05)和稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗(r=0.391,P<0.05)呈正相关。
我们得出结论,基于猪油的高脂饮食比氢化植物起酥油饮食更能加剧体重增加以及肥胖和胰岛素抵抗的发展。这些结果进一步表明在确定高脂饮食结果时,标准化脂肪酸组成和所用脂肪类型的重要性。