Töger Johannes, Kanski Mikael, Arvidsson Per M, Carlsson Marcus, Kovács Sándor J, Borgquist Rasmus, Revstedt Johan, Söderlind Gustaf, Arheden Håkan, Heiberg Einar
Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Numerical Analysis, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jun;43(6):1386-97. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25111. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
To present and validate a new method for 4D flow quantification of vortex-ring mixing during early, rapid filling of the left ventricle (LV) as a potential index of diastolic dysfunction and heart failure.
4D flow mixing measurements were validated using planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) in a phantom setup. Controls (n = 23) and heart failure patients (n = 23) were studied using 4D flow at 1.5T (26 subjects) or 3T (20 subjects) to determine vortex volume (VV) and inflowing volume (VVinflow ). The volume mixed into the vortex-ring was quantified as VVmix-in = VV-VVinflow . The mixing ratio was defined as MXR = VVmix-in /VV. Furthermore, we quantified the fraction of the end-systolic volume (ESV) mixed into the vortex-ring (VVmix-in /ESV) and the fraction of the LV volume at diastasis (DV) occupied by the vortex-ring (VV/DV).
PLIF validation of MXR showed fair agreement (R(2) = 0.45, mean ± SD 1 ± 6%). MXR was higher in patients compared to controls (28 ± 11% vs. 16 ± 10%, P < 0.001), while VVmix-in /ESV and VV/DV were lower in patients (10 ± 6% vs. 18 ± 12%, P < 0.01 and 25 ± 8% vs. 50 ± 6%, P < 0.0001).
Vortex-ring mixing can be quantified using 4D flow. The differences in mixing parameters observed between controls and patients motivate further investigation as indices of diastolic dysfunction. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:1386-1397.
提出并验证一种用于左心室(LV)早期快速充盈期间涡环混合的4D流量定量新方法,作为舒张功能障碍和心力衰竭的潜在指标。
在模型设置中使用平面激光诱导荧光(PLIF)对4D流量混合测量进行验证。使用1.5T(26名受试者)或3T(20名受试者)的4D流量对对照组(n = 23)和心力衰竭患者(n = 23)进行研究,以确定涡体积(VV)和流入体积(VVinflow)。混入涡环的体积量化为VVmix-in = VV - VVinflow。混合比定义为MXR = VVmix-in / VV。此外,我们量化了收缩末期容积(ESV)混入涡环的比例(VVmix-in / ESV)以及舒张末期(DV)时LV体积中被涡环占据的比例(VV / DV)。
MXR的PLIF验证显示出较好的一致性(R(2) = 0.45,平均值±标准差1 ± 6%)。与对照组相比,患者的MXR更高(28 ± 11%对16 ± 10%,P < 0.001),而患者的VVmix-in / ESV和VV / DV更低(10 ± 6%对18 ± 12%,P < 0.01;25 ± 8%对50 ± 6%,P < 0.0001)。
涡环混合可通过4D流量进行量化。对照组和患者之间观察到的混合参数差异促使人们进一步研究其作为舒张功能障碍指标的可能性。《磁共振成像杂志》2016年;43:1386 - 1397。