Suppr超能文献

使用粒子图像测速技术和平面激光诱导荧光对四维流动磁共振速度和涡环体积进行独立验证。

Independent validation of four-dimensional flow MR velocities and vortex ring volume using particle imaging velocimetry and planar laser-Induced fluorescence.

作者信息

Töger Johannes, Bidhult Sebastian, Revstedt Johan, Carlsson Marcus, Arheden Håkan, Heiberg Einar

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Numerical Analysis, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2016 Mar;75(3):1064-75. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25683. Epub 2015 May 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to: (i) present and characterize a phantom setup for validation of four-dimensional (4D) flow using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF); (ii) validate 4D flow velocity measurements using PIV; and (iii) validate 4D flow vortex ring volume (VV) using PLIF.

METHODS

A pulsatile pump and a tank with a 25-mm nozzle were constructed. PIV measurements (1.5 × 1.5 mm pixels, temporal resolution 10 ms) were obtained on two occasions. The 4D flow (3 × 3 × 3 mm voxels, temporal resolution 50 ms) was acquired using SENSE = 2. VV was quantified using PLIF and 4D flow.

RESULTS

PIV showed excellent day-to-day stability (R(2) = 0.99, bias -0.04 ± 0.72 cm/s). The 4D flow mean velocities agreed well with PIV (R(2) = 0.95, bias 0.16 ± 2.65 cm/s). Peak velocities in 4D flow were underestimated by 7-18% compared with PIV (y = 0.79x + 2.7, R(2) = 0.96, -12 ± 5%). VV showed excellent agreement between PLIF and 4D flow (R(2) = 0.99, 2.4 ± 1.5 mL).

CONCLUSION

This study shows: (i) The proposed phantom enables reliable validation of 4D flow. (ii) 4D flow velocities show good agreement with PIV, but peak velocities were underestimated due to low spatial and temporal resolution. (iii) Vortex ring volume (VV) can be quantified using 4D flow.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在:(i)介绍并描述一种用于使用粒子图像测速技术(PIV)和平面激光诱导荧光技术(PLIF)验证四维(4D)流的体模设置;(ii)使用PIV验证4D流速度测量;(iii)使用PLIF验证4D流涡环体积(VV)。

方法

构建了一个脉动泵和一个带有25毫米喷嘴的水箱。在两个不同时间进行了PIV测量(像素为1.5×1.5毫米,时间分辨率为10毫秒)。使用敏感度(SENSE)=2获取4D流(体素为3×3×3毫米,时间分辨率为50毫秒)。使用PLIF和4D流对VV进行量化。

结果

PIV显示出出色的日常稳定性(R² = 0.99,偏差为-0.04±0.72厘米/秒)。4D流平均速度与PIV吻合良好(R² = 0.95,偏差为0.16±2.65厘米/秒)。与PIV相比,4D流中的峰值速度被低估了7 - 18%(y = 0.79x + 2.7,R² = 0.96,-12±5%)。VV在PLIF和4D流之间显示出极好的一致性(R² = 0.99,2.4±1.5毫升)。

结论

本研究表明:(i)所提出的体模能够可靠地验证4D流。(ii)4D流速度与PIV吻合良好,但由于空间和时间分辨率较低,峰值速度被低估。(iii)涡环体积(VV)可以使用4D流进行量化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验