• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用粒子图像测速技术和平面激光诱导荧光对四维流动磁共振速度和涡环体积进行独立验证。

Independent validation of four-dimensional flow MR velocities and vortex ring volume using particle imaging velocimetry and planar laser-Induced fluorescence.

作者信息

Töger Johannes, Bidhult Sebastian, Revstedt Johan, Carlsson Marcus, Arheden Håkan, Heiberg Einar

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Numerical Analysis, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 2016 Mar;75(3):1064-75. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25683. Epub 2015 May 2.

DOI:10.1002/mrm.25683
PMID:25940239
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to: (i) present and characterize a phantom setup for validation of four-dimensional (4D) flow using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF); (ii) validate 4D flow velocity measurements using PIV; and (iii) validate 4D flow vortex ring volume (VV) using PLIF.

METHODS

A pulsatile pump and a tank with a 25-mm nozzle were constructed. PIV measurements (1.5 × 1.5 mm pixels, temporal resolution 10 ms) were obtained on two occasions. The 4D flow (3 × 3 × 3 mm voxels, temporal resolution 50 ms) was acquired using SENSE = 2. VV was quantified using PLIF and 4D flow.

RESULTS

PIV showed excellent day-to-day stability (R(2) = 0.99, bias -0.04 ± 0.72 cm/s). The 4D flow mean velocities agreed well with PIV (R(2) = 0.95, bias 0.16 ± 2.65 cm/s). Peak velocities in 4D flow were underestimated by 7-18% compared with PIV (y = 0.79x + 2.7, R(2) = 0.96, -12 ± 5%). VV showed excellent agreement between PLIF and 4D flow (R(2) = 0.99, 2.4 ± 1.5 mL).

CONCLUSION

This study shows: (i) The proposed phantom enables reliable validation of 4D flow. (ii) 4D flow velocities show good agreement with PIV, but peak velocities were underestimated due to low spatial and temporal resolution. (iii) Vortex ring volume (VV) can be quantified using 4D flow.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在:(i)介绍并描述一种用于使用粒子图像测速技术(PIV)和平面激光诱导荧光技术(PLIF)验证四维(4D)流的体模设置;(ii)使用PIV验证4D流速度测量;(iii)使用PLIF验证4D流涡环体积(VV)。

方法

构建了一个脉动泵和一个带有25毫米喷嘴的水箱。在两个不同时间进行了PIV测量(像素为1.5×1.5毫米,时间分辨率为10毫秒)。使用敏感度(SENSE)=2获取4D流(体素为3×3×3毫米,时间分辨率为50毫秒)。使用PLIF和4D流对VV进行量化。

结果

PIV显示出出色的日常稳定性(R² = 0.99,偏差为-0.04±0.72厘米/秒)。4D流平均速度与PIV吻合良好(R² = 0.95,偏差为0.16±2.65厘米/秒)。与PIV相比,4D流中的峰值速度被低估了7 - 18%(y = 0.79x + 2.7,R² = 0.96,-12±5%)。VV在PLIF和4D流之间显示出极好的一致性(R² = 0.99,2.4±1.5毫升)。

结论

本研究表明:(i)所提出的体模能够可靠地验证4D流。(ii)4D流速度与PIV吻合良好,但由于空间和时间分辨率较低,峰值速度被低估。(iii)涡环体积(VV)可以使用4D流进行量化。

相似文献

1
Independent validation of four-dimensional flow MR velocities and vortex ring volume using particle imaging velocimetry and planar laser-Induced fluorescence.使用粒子图像测速技术和平面激光诱导荧光对四维流动磁共振速度和涡环体积进行独立验证。
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Mar;75(3):1064-75. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25683. Epub 2015 May 2.
2
Vortex-ring mixing as a measure of diastolic function of the human heart: Phantom validation and initial observations in healthy volunteers and patients with heart failure.涡环混合作为评估人类心脏舒张功能的一种方法:模型验证及在健康志愿者和心力衰竭患者中的初步观察
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jun;43(6):1386-97. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25111. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
3
Validation and reproducibility of cardiovascular 4D-flow MRI from two vendors using 2 × 2 parallel imaging acceleration in pulsatile flow phantom and in vivo with and without respiratory gating.使用2×2并行成像加速技术,在脉动流模体以及有和没有呼吸门控的活体中,对两家供应商的心血管4D流磁共振成像进行验证和可重复性研究。
Acta Radiol. 2019 Mar;60(3):327-337. doi: 10.1177/0284185118784981. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
4
Experimental Validation of Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (EMRI) Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).利用粒子图像测速法(PIV)对增强磁共振成像(EMRI)进行实验验证。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Dec;49(12):3481-3493. doi: 10.1007/s10439-021-02811-1. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
5
Mapping mean and fluctuating velocities by Bayesian multipoint MR velocity encoding-validation against 3D particle tracking velocimetry.通过贝叶斯多点磁共振速度编码绘制平均速度和脉动速度——与三维粒子跟踪测速法的对比验证
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Apr;71(4):1405-15. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24785. Epub 2013 May 13.
6
Comparison of 4D Flow MRI and Particle Image Velocimetry Using an In Vitro Carotid Bifurcation Model.体外颈动脉分叉模型的 4D 流 MRI 与粒子图像 velocimetry 的比较。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Dec;46(12):2112-2122. doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-02109-9. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
7
A phantom study comparing radial trajectories for accelerated cardiac 4D flow MRI against a particle imaging velocimetry reference.一项针对加速心脏4D流动磁共振成像的径向轨迹与粒子图像测速参考进行比较的体模研究。
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Jul;86(1):363-371. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28698. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
8
Accuracy and limitations of vector flow mapping: left ventricular phantom validation using stereo particle image velocimetory.向量流映射的准确性和局限性:使用立体粒子图像测速技术对左心室模型进行验证
J Echocardiogr. 2017 Jun;15(2):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s12574-016-0321-5. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
9
Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.真实尺寸颅内动脉瘤模型中的复杂流型:相位对比 MRI 与粒子图像测速和计算流体动力学比较。
NMR Biomed. 2012 Jan;25(1):14-26. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1706. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
10
Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software.使用 4D 流磁共振成像技术测量人心左右心室的血流动力学: 体模验证、可重复性、对呼吸门控的敏感性和免费分析软件。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195597. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Image reconstruction impacts haemodynamic parameters derived from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging with compressed sensing.图像重建会影响通过压缩感知从四维流动磁共振成像中得出的血流动力学参数。
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 Dec 17;2(4):qyae137. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae137. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Multi-Modal in Vitro Experiments Mimicking the Flow Through a Mitral Heart Valve Phantom.模拟流经二尖瓣心脏瓣膜模型血流的多模态体外实验
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2024 Oct;15(5):572-583. doi: 10.1007/s13239-024-00732-3. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement: 2023 update.
4D Flow 心血管磁共振共识声明:2023 更新版。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023 Jul 20;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00942-z.
4
Correct Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Reduces Stagnant Blood Flow and the Risk of Thrombus Formation: A Proof-of-Concept Experimental Study Using 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.左心耳的正确闭合可减少血流停滞并降低血栓形成风险:使用 4D 血流磁共振成像的概念验证实验研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2023 Jul;24(7):647-659. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2023.0173.
5
Increased biventricular hemodynamic forces in precapillary pulmonary hypertension.肺动脉高压患者左、右心室的血流动力学压力增加。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 19;12(1):19933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24267-6.
6
A phantom study comparing radial trajectories for accelerated cardiac 4D flow MRI against a particle imaging velocimetry reference.一项针对加速心脏4D流动磁共振成像的径向轨迹与粒子图像测速参考进行比较的体模研究。
Magn Reson Med. 2021 Jul;86(1):363-371. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28698. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Validation of non-contrast multiple overlapping thin-slab 4D-flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.非对比多层重叠薄块 4D 流心脏磁共振成像的验证。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Dec;74:223-231. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
A new vessel segmentation algorithm for robust blood flow quantification from two-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance images.一种用于从二维相位对比磁共振图像中进行稳健血流定量的新型血管分割算法。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2019 Sep;39(5):327-338. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12582. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
9
Validation and reproducibility of cardiovascular 4D-flow MRI from two vendors using 2 × 2 parallel imaging acceleration in pulsatile flow phantom and in vivo with and without respiratory gating.使用2×2并行成像加速技术,在脉动流模体以及有和没有呼吸门控的活体中,对两家供应商的心血管4D流磁共振成像进行验证和可重复性研究。
Acta Radiol. 2019 Mar;60(3):327-337. doi: 10.1177/0284185118784981. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Independent validation of metric optimized gating for fetal cardiovascular phase-contrast flow imaging.基于测量指标优化的门控技术在胎儿心血管相位对比血流成像中的独立验证。
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jan;81(1):495-503. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27392. Epub 2018 Aug 29.