Suppr超能文献

多变量标准最准确地区分呼吸困难的心脏病因与非心脏病因。

Multivariate Criteria Most Accurately Distinguish Cardiac from Noncardiac Causes of Dyspnea.

作者信息

Ahmad Mirza Nubair, Yusuf Syed Hasan, Ullah Rafath, Ahmad Mirza Mujadil, Ellis Mary K, Yousaf Haroon, Paterick Timothy E, Ammar Khawaja Afzal

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Dec 1;42(6):514-21. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4373. eCollection 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing provides oxygen pulse as a continuous measure of stroke volume, which is superior to other stress-testing methods in which systolic function is measured at baseline and at peak stress. However, the optimal peak oxygen pulse criterion for distinguishing cardiac from noncardiac causes of exercise limitation is unknown. In comparing several peak oxygen pulse criteria against the clinical standard of cardiopulmonary exercise testing, we retrospectively studied 54 consecutive patients referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing. These exercise tests included measurement of oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, breathing reserve, arterial blood gases at baseline and at peak stress, exercise electrocardiogram, heart rate, and blood pressure response. Results were blindly interpreted and patients were categorized as members either of our Cardiac Group (abnormal result secondary to cardiac causes of exercise limitation) or of our Noncardiac Group (normal or abnormal result secondary to any noncardiac cause of exercise limitation). The accuracy of the peak oxygen pulse criteria ranged from 50% for univariate criterion (≤15 mL/beat), to 61% for oxygen pulse curve pattern, to 63% for bivariate criterion (≤15 mL/beat for men, ≤10 mL/beat for women), to as high as 81% for a multivariate criterion. All multivariate criteria outperformed oxygen pulse curve pattern, univariate, and bivariate criteria. This is the first study to evaluate the optimal peak oxygen pulse criterion for differentiating cardiac from noncardiac causes of exercise limitation. Multivariate criteria (especially a criterion incorporating age, sex, height, and weight) should be used preferentially, as opposed to the commonly used univariate and bivariate criteria.

摘要

心肺运动试验可提供氧脉搏,作为对每搏输出量的连续测量指标,这优于其他应激试验方法,后者仅在基线和应激峰值时测量收缩功能。然而,区分运动受限的心脏原因与非心脏原因的最佳峰值氧脉搏标准尚不清楚。在将几种峰值氧脉搏标准与心肺运动试验的临床标准进行比较时,我们回顾性研究了54例连续接受心肺运动试验的患者。这些运动试验包括测量耗氧量、二氧化碳生成量、呼吸储备、基线和应激峰值时的动脉血气、运动心电图、心率以及血压反应。结果由专人进行盲法解读,患者被分为心脏组(运动受限由心脏原因导致的异常结果)或非心脏组(运动受限由任何非心脏原因导致的正常或异常结果)。峰值氧脉搏标准的准确性范围为:单变量标准(≤15毫升/次搏动)为50%,氧脉搏曲线模式为61%,双变量标准(男性≤15毫升/次搏动,女性≤10毫升/次搏动)为63%,多变量标准高达81%。所有多变量标准均优于氧脉搏曲线模式、单变量和双变量标准。这是第一项评估区分运动受限的心脏原因与非心脏原因的最佳峰值氧脉搏标准的研究。应优先使用多变量标准(尤其是纳入年龄、性别、身高和体重的标准),而不是常用的单变量和双变量标准。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验