• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病护理质量轨迹中的团队流程变异

Team Process Variation Across Diabetes Quality of Care Trajectories.

作者信息

Benzer Justin K, Mohr David C, Evans Leigh, Young Gary, Meterko Mark M, Moore Scott C, Nealon Seibert Marjorie, Osatuke Katerine, Stolzmann Kelly L, White Bert, Charns Martin P

机构信息

VA Boston Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA, USA Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, TX, USA

VA Boston Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA, USA Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Oct;73(5):565-89. doi: 10.1177/1077558715617380. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1177/1077558715617380
PMID:26670549
Abstract

Conceptual frameworks in health care do not address mechanisms whereby teamwork processes affect quality of care. We seek to fill this gap by applying a framework of teamwork processes to compare different patterns of primary care performance over time. We thematically analyzed 114 primary care staff interviews across 17 primary care clinics. We purposefully selected clinics using diabetes quality of care over 3 years using four categories: consistently high, improving, worsening, and consistently low. Analyses compared participant responses within and between performance categories. Differences were observed among performance categories for action processes (monitoring progress and coordination), transition processes (goal specification and strategy formulation), and interpersonal processes (conflict management and affect management). Analyses also revealed emergent concepts related to psychological and organizational context that were reported to affect team processes. This study is a first step toward a comprehensive model of how teamwork processes might affect quality of care.

摘要

医疗保健领域的概念框架并未涉及团队协作过程影响医疗质量的机制。我们试图通过应用一个团队协作过程框架来填补这一空白,以比较不同模式的初级保健绩效随时间的变化情况。我们对来自17家初级保健诊所的114名初级保健工作人员的访谈进行了主题分析。我们根据三年来糖尿病护理质量,有目的地选择了四类诊所:持续高、改善、恶化和持续低。分析比较了绩效类别内部和之间参与者的回答。在行动过程(监测进展和协调)、过渡过程(目标设定和战略制定)和人际过程(冲突管理和情感管理)的绩效类别之间观察到了差异。分析还揭示了与心理和组织背景相关的新出现的概念,据报告这些概念会影响团队过程。这项研究是朝着建立一个关于团队协作过程如何影响医疗质量的综合模型迈出的第一步。

相似文献

1
Team Process Variation Across Diabetes Quality of Care Trajectories.糖尿病护理质量轨迹中的团队流程变异
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Oct;73(5):565-89. doi: 10.1177/1077558715617380. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
2
Features of primary health care teams associated with successful quality improvement of diabetes care: a qualitative study.与糖尿病护理成功质量改进相关的初级卫生保健团队特征:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2001 Feb;18(1):21-6. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.1.21.
3
The Teamwork Study: enhancing the role of non-GP staff in chronic disease management in general practice.团队合作研究:增强非全科医生工作人员在全科医疗慢性病管理中的作用。
Aust J Prim Health. 2013;19(3):184-9. doi: 10.1071/PY11071.
4
What is happening under the surface? Power, conflict and the performance of medical teams.表面之下正在发生什么?权力、冲突与医疗团队的表现。
Med Educ. 2012 Sep;46(9):838-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04322.x.
5
The Impact of Operating Room Distractions on Stress, Workload, and Teamwork.手术室干扰对压力、工作负荷和团队合作的影响。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1079-84. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001051.
6
The Anatomy and Physiology of Teaming in Cancer Care Delivery: A Conceptual Framework.癌症护理中团队合作的解剖学和生理学:概念框架。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Apr 6;113(4):360-370. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa166.
7
Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a qualitative analysis.普通外科护理流程与结构与术后结果的关系:一项定性分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.013.
8
A team approach to quality improvement.采用团队方式进行质量改进。
Fam Pract Manag. 1999 Apr;6(4):25-30.
9
A human factors systems approach to understanding team-based primary care: a qualitative analysis.一种基于人为因素系统方法来理解团队式初级医疗保健:定性分析
Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):721-726. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw093. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
The teamwork in assertive community treatment (TACT) scale: development and validation.果敢社区治疗中的团队合作(TACT)量表:编制与验证。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Nov;63(11):1108-17. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100338.

引用本文的文献

1
What can we learn from COVID-19?: examining the resilience of primary care teams.我们能从新冠疫情中学到什么?:审视基层医疗团队的复原力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 22;14:1265529. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1265529. eCollection 2023.
2
Overcoming Therapeutic Inertia as the Achilles' Heel for Improving Suboptimal Diabetes Care: An Integrative Review.克服治疗惰性:改善不理想糖尿病护理的阿喀琉斯之踵:综合评价。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2023 Feb;38(1):34-42. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2022.1649. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
Applying a Model of Teamwork Processes to Emergency Medical Services.
将团队协作过程模型应用于紧急医疗服务。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 19;21(6):264-271. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47238.
4
Teaching primary care teamwork: a conceptual model of primary care team performance.基层医疗团队教学:基层医疗团队绩效的概念模型
Clin Teach. 2020 Jun;17(3):249-254. doi: 10.1111/tct.13037. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
5
Balancing Unbalanced Lives: A Practical Framework for Personal and Organizational Change.平衡失衡的生活:个人与组织变革的实用框架
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb 26;3(1):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.12.001. eCollection 2019 Mar.