• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将团队协作过程模型应用于紧急医疗服务。

Applying a Model of Teamwork Processes to Emergency Medical Services.

机构信息

UT Health-San Antonio, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.

The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychiatry, Austin, Texas.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 19;21(6):264-271. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47238.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47238
PMID:33207175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7673905/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Effective teamwork has been shown to optimize patient safety. However, research centered on the critical inputs, processes, and outcomes of team effectiveness in emergency medical services (EMS) has only recently begun to emerge. We conducted a theory-driven qualitative study of teamwork processes-the interdependent actions that convert inputs to outputs-by frontline EMS personnel in order to provide a model for use in EMS education and research.

METHODS

We purposively sampled participants from an EMS agency in Houston, TX. Full-time employees with a valid emergency medical technician license were eligible. Using semi-structured format, we queried respondents on task/team functions and enablers/obstacles of teamwork in EMS. Phone interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using a thematic analytic approach, we combined codes into candidate themes through an iterative process. Analytic memos during coding and analysis identified potential themes, which were reviewed/refined and then compared against a model of teamwork processes in emergency medicine.

RESULTS

We reached saturation once 32 respondents completed interviews. Among participants, 30 (94%) were male; the median experience was 15 years. The data demonstrated general support for the framework. Teamwork processes were clustered into four domains: planning; action; reflection; and interpersonal processes. Additionally, we identified six emergent concepts during open coding: leadership; crew familiarity; team cohesion; interpersonal trust; shared mental models; and procedural knowledge.

CONCLUSION

In this thematic analysis, we outlined a new framework of EMS teamwork processes to describe the procedures that EMS operators employ to convert individual inputs into team performance outputs. The revised framework may be useful in both EMS education and research to empirically evaluate the key planning, action, reflection, and interpersonal processes that are critical to teamwork effectiveness in EMS.

摘要

简介

有效的团队合作已被证明可以优化患者安全。然而,最近才开始有研究关注急救医疗服务(EMS)中团队有效性的关键投入、过程和结果。我们对一线 EMS 人员的团队合作过程(将投入转化为产出的相互依存的行动)进行了理论驱动的定性研究,以便为 EMS 教育和研究提供一个模型。

方法

我们从休斯顿的一家 EMS 机构有目的地抽取了参与者。具有有效紧急医疗技术员执照的全职员工有资格参加。我们使用半结构化格式询问受访者在 EMS 中的任务/团队职能以及团队合作的促进因素/障碍。电话访谈进行了录音和转录。使用主题分析方法,我们通过迭代过程将代码合并为候选主题。在编码和分析过程中,分析备忘录确定了潜在的主题,这些主题经过审查/完善,然后与急诊医学中的团队合作过程模型进行了比较。

结果

在 32 名受访者完成访谈后,我们达到了饱和。在参与者中,有 30 名(94%)是男性;中位数经验为 15 年。数据普遍支持该框架。团队合作过程分为四个领域:计划;行动;反思;和人际过程。此外,我们在开放式编码过程中确定了六个新出现的概念:领导力;机组人员熟悉度;团队凝聚力;人际信任;共享心理模型;和程序知识。

结论

在这个主题分析中,我们概述了一个新的 EMS 团队合作过程框架,以描述 EMS 操作人员将个人投入转化为团队绩效产出所采用的程序。修订后的框架在 EMS 教育和研究中可能很有用,可以从经验上评估对 EMS 团队有效性至关重要的关键规划、行动、反思和人际过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d88e/7673905/04a060c99f64/wjem-21-264-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d88e/7673905/c869adb3899f/wjem-21-264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d88e/7673905/04a060c99f64/wjem-21-264-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d88e/7673905/c869adb3899f/wjem-21-264-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d88e/7673905/04a060c99f64/wjem-21-264-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Applying a Model of Teamwork Processes to Emergency Medical Services.将团队协作过程模型应用于紧急医疗服务。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 19;21(6):264-271. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47238.
2
Defining Components of Team Leadership and Membership in Prehospital Emergency Medical Services.界定院前急救医疗服务中团队领导和成员的组成部分。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):645-651. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1315200. Epub 2017 May 2.
3
A qualitative assessment of factors that influence emergency medical services partnerships in prehospital research.定性评估影响院前研究中紧急医疗服务伙伴关系的因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;19(2):161-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01283.x.
4
Teammate Familiarity, Teamwork, and Risk of Workplace Injury in Emergency Medical Services Teams.紧急医疗服务团队中的队友熟悉度、团队合作与工作场所受伤风险
J Emerg Nurs. 2017 Jul;43(4):339-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Organisational factors affecting emergency medical services' performance in rural and urban areas of Saudi Arabia.影响沙特阿拉伯城乡地区急救医疗服务表现的组织因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06565-3.
6
Barriers and enablers to effective interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.手术室中有效跨专业团队合作的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0249576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249576. eCollection 2021.
7
Public Perception of Emergency Medical Services in the United States.美国公众对紧急医疗服务的认知。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Dec;31(S1):S112-S117. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001126. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
8
The novel role of paramedics in collaborative emergency centres aligns with their professional identity: A qualitative analysis.护理人员在协作式急救中心的新角色与他们的职业身份相一致:一项定性分析。
CJEM. 2018 Jul;20(4):518-522. doi: 10.1017/cem.2018.401.
9
Shame and Guilt in EMS: A Qualitative Analysis of Culture and Attitudes in Prehospital Emergency Care.《急诊医疗服务中的羞耻感和内疚感:对院前急救文化和态度的定性分析》。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(4):418-426. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2074178. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
An Historical Examination of the Development of Emergency Medical Services Education in the US through Key Reports (1966-2014).通过关键报告(1966 - 2014年)对美国紧急医疗服务教育发展的历史考察
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Feb;31(1):90-7. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15005506. Epub 2015 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Saving Time Saves Lives: Optimizing Radio Dispatching in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests.节省时间就是挽救生命:优化院外心脏骤停的无线电调度
Cureus. 2024 Sep 26;16(9):e70257. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70257. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Ambulance professionals' experiences of teamwork in the context of a team training programme - a qualitative study.救护车专业人员在团队培训计划背景下的团队合作体验——一项定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01018-6.
3
Working Against the Clock: A Model for Rural STEMI Triage.分秒必争:农村ST段抬高型心肌梗死分诊模式

本文引用的文献

1
Defining Components of Team Leadership and Membership in Prehospital Emergency Medical Services.界定院前急救医疗服务中团队领导和成员的组成部分。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):645-651. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1315200. Epub 2017 May 2.
2
Team Process Variation Across Diabetes Quality of Care Trajectories.糖尿病护理质量轨迹中的团队流程变异
Med Care Res Rev. 2016 Oct;73(5):565-89. doi: 10.1177/1077558715617380. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
3
Considerations for Multiteam Systems in Emergency Medical Services.多团队系统在紧急医疗服务中的考虑因素。
Health Serv Insights. 2021 Aug 4;14:11786329211037521. doi: 10.1177/11786329211037521. eCollection 2021.
J Patient Saf. 2019 Jun;15(2):150-153. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000213.
4
Crew Resource Management in the Intensive Care Unit: a prospective 3-year cohort study.重症监护病房中的医护资源管理:一项为期3年的前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Nov;59(10):1319-29. doi: 10.1111/aas.12573. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
TeamSTEPPS Improves Operating Room Efficiency and Patient Safety.团队策略与工具提升手术室效率及患者安全。
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Sep;31(5):408-14. doi: 10.1177/1062860615583671. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
6
Stigma as a barrier to seeking health care among military personnel with mental health problems.污名化是心理健康问题军人寻求医疗保健的障碍。
Epidemiol Rev. 2015;37:144-62. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxu012. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
7
TeamSTEPPS and patient safety in healthcare.医疗保健中的团队策略与患者安全。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;32(3):5-10. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21099.
8
Quality improvement initiative to reduce serious safety events and improve patient safety culture.质量改进计划,以减少严重安全事件并改善患者安全文化。
Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):e423-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3566. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
9
Interdisciplinary team training: five lessons learned.跨学科团队培训:五个经验教训。
Am J Nurs. 2012 Jun;112(6):47-52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000415127.84605.1f.
10
Root causes of errors in a simulated prehospital pediatric emergency.模拟院前儿科急诊中错误的根本原因。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):37-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01252.x.