Sasaki Jeffer Eidi, Hickey Amanda M, Staudenmayer John W, John Dinesh, Kent Jane A, Freedson Patty S
1Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA; 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA; and 3Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 May;48(5):941-50. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000844.
The objective of this study is to compare activity type classification rates of machine learning algorithms trained on laboratory versus free-living accelerometer data in older adults.
Thirty-five older adults (21 females and 14 males, 70.8 ± 4.9 yr) performed selected activities in the laboratory while wearing three ActiGraph GT3X+ activity monitors (in the dominant hip, wrist, and ankle; ActiGraph, LLC, Pensacola, FL). Monitors were initialized to collect raw acceleration data at a sampling rate of 80 Hz. Fifteen of the participants also wore GT3X+ in free-living settings and were directly observed for 2-3 h. Time- and frequency-domain features from acceleration signals of each monitor were used to train random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models to classify five activity types: sedentary, standing, household, locomotion, and recreational activities. All algorithms were trained on laboratory data (RFLab and SVMLab) and free-living data (RFFL and SVMFL) using 20-s signal sampling windows. Classification accuracy rates of both types of algorithms were tested on free-living data using a leave-one-out technique.
Overall classification accuracy rates for the algorithms developed from laboratory data were between 49% (wrist) and 55% (ankle) for the SVMLab algorithms and 49% (wrist) to 54% (ankle) for the RFLab algorithms. The classification accuracy rates for SVMFL and RFFL algorithms ranged from 58% (wrist) to 69% (ankle) and from 61% (wrist) to 67% (ankle), respectively.
Our algorithms developed on free-living accelerometer data were more accurate in classifying the activity type in free-living older adults than those on our algorithms developed on laboratory accelerometer data. Future studies should consider using free-living accelerometer data to train machine learning algorithms in older adults.
本研究的目的是比较在实验室环境与老年人自由生活环境下的加速度计数据上训练的机器学习算法的活动类型分类率。
35名老年人(21名女性和14名男性,年龄70.8±4.9岁)在实验室中佩戴三个ActiGraph GT3X+活动监测器(分别位于优势侧臀部、手腕和脚踝;ActiGraph公司,佛罗里达州彭萨科拉)进行特定活动。监测器初始设置为以80Hz的采样率收集原始加速度数据。其中15名参与者还在自由生活环境中佩戴GT3X+,并被直接观察2至3小时。每个监测器加速度信号的时域和频域特征用于训练随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)模型,以对五种活动类型进行分类:久坐、站立、家务、移动和娱乐活动。所有算法均使用20秒的信号采样窗口,在实验室数据(RFLab和SVMLab)和自由生活数据(RFFL和SVMFL)上进行训练。两种算法的分类准确率均使用留一法在自由生活数据上进行测试。
基于实验室数据开发的算法,SVMLab算法的总体分类准确率在49%(手腕)至55%(脚踝)之间,RFLab算法在49%(手腕)至54%(脚踝)之间。SVMFL和RFFL算法的分类准确率分别在58%(手腕)至69%(脚踝)和61%(手腕)至67%(脚踝)之间。
我们基于自由生活加速度计数据开发的算法,在对自由生活的老年人的活动类型进行分类时,比基于实验室加速度计数据开发的算法更准确。未来的研究应考虑使用自由生活加速度计数据来训练老年人的机器学习算法。