Goktug Goksel, Karakoyunlu Nihat, Sener Nevzat Can, Zengin Kursad, Nalbant Ismail, Karabacak Osman, Ozturk Ufuk, Imamoglu Abdurrahim
Department of Urology, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Nov;31(11):568-71. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
This study aimed to compare the outcomes of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) to PCNL with intraoperative antegrade flexible nephroscopy (IAFN) for treating stones of staghorn nature. We retrospectively analyzed patients treated using PCNL between January 2007 and July 2013. A total of 1250 patients were treated using PCNL, and 166 patients had staghorn stones. All patients had been subjected to a complete blood count, routine biochemical analyses, coagulation tests, a complete urine analysis, and urine cultures. Patients with a positive urine culture had been treated with appropriate antibiotics until the urine culture became negative. After purchasing a flexible renoscope in March 2012, we routinely used this tool to improve the stone-free (SF) rate. The 105 patients who underwent standard PCNL prior to March 2012 were classified as Group 1, and the 61 patients who underwent PCNL + IAFN after that date were classified as Group 2. The two groups had similar and homogeneous demographic data. The fluoroscopy and total operative times were significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (p < 0.01). Additionally, the hospitalization time (p < 0.01) and the mean hematocrit decrease (p < 0.01) were significantly lower in Group 1. In both groups, the SF rates were higher than 85%, similar to those reported in the literature. Although Group 2 had a slightly better SF rates, this difference was not statistically significant. For staghorn calculi, PCNL combined with IAFN yields excellent outcomes. However, similar prospective studies on larger cohorts should be performed to support our findings.
本研究旨在比较标准经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与术中顺行软性肾镜检查(IAFN)辅助的PCNL治疗鹿角形结石的疗效。我们回顾性分析了2007年1月至2013年7月期间接受PCNL治疗的患者。共有1250例患者接受了PCNL治疗,其中166例患有鹿角形结石。所有患者均进行了全血细胞计数、常规生化分析、凝血试验、尿常规分析及尿培养。尿培养阳性的患者接受了适当的抗生素治疗,直至尿培养转阴。2012年3月购买软性肾镜后,我们常规使用该工具以提高结石清除率(SF)。2012年3月之前接受标准PCNL的105例患者被分为第1组,之后接受PCNL + IAFN的61例患者被分为第2组。两组的人口统计学数据相似且具有同质性。第2组的透视时间和总手术时间显著高于第1组(p < 0.01)。此外,第1组的住院时间(p < 0.01)和平均血细胞比容下降幅度(p < 0.01)显著更低。两组的结石清除率均高于85%,与文献报道相似。虽然第2组的结石清除率略高,但差异无统计学意义。对于鹿角形结石,PCNL联合IAFN可取得良好疗效。然而,应开展关于更大队列的类似前瞻性研究以支持我们的研究结果。