• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

20世纪70年代至2014年不同宗教群体的性别与同性恋态度:相似性、差异性与适应性

Gender and homosexuality attitudes across religious groups from the 1970s to 2014: Similarity, distinction, and adaptation.

作者信息

Schnabel Landon

机构信息

Indiana University, Bloomington, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Res. 2016 Jan;55:31-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.012
PMID:26680286
Abstract

This study uses General Social Survey data to compare gender and homosexuality across American religious groups from the 1970s to 2014, examining three possible patterns for how evangelical attitudes relate to those of other groups: (1) they are similar; (2) they are different, but move together over time; (3) they are different and converge or diverge over time. Evangelical gender attitudes regarding work and family issues are more conservative than those of all other groups, but are adaptive to broad trends, changing at a rate similar to those of other groups. Evangelical attitudes toward the morality of homosexuality and same-sex marriage are more conservative than those of all other religious groups, and their rate of change is slower over time. Separate trends on the two issues suggest that gender and sexuality attitude change is decoupled, especially among evangelicals who are adapting more on gender while increasingly distinguishing themselves on same-sex relationships. A three-stage process of religious tension appears to characterize evangelical identity-building: (1) similarity, (2) distinction, and (3) adaptation.

摘要

本研究利用综合社会调查数据,比较了20世纪70年代至2014年美国各宗教群体中的性别与同性恋情况,考察了福音派态度与其他群体态度之间可能存在的三种模式:(1)它们相似;(2)它们不同,但随时间推移而共同变化;(3)它们不同,且随时间推移而趋同或分化。福音派在工作和家庭问题上的性别态度比所有其他群体更为保守,但能适应广泛趋势,变化速度与其他群体相似。福音派对于同性恋道德和同性婚姻的态度比所有其他宗教群体更为保守,且随着时间推移其变化速度较慢。这两个问题的不同趋势表明,性别和性取向态度的变化是脱钩的,尤其是在福音派中,他们在性别方面的适应性更强,而在同性关系上则日益凸显自身特点。宗教紧张的三个阶段过程似乎是福音派身份构建的特征:(1)相似性,(2)差异性,(3)适应性。

相似文献

1
Gender and homosexuality attitudes across religious groups from the 1970s to 2014: Similarity, distinction, and adaptation.20世纪70年代至2014年不同宗教群体的性别与同性恋态度:相似性、差异性与适应性
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Jan;55:31-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
2
Religion and the rainbow struggle: does religion factor into attitudes toward homosexuality and same-sex civil unions in Brazil?宗教与彩虹斗争:宗教因素是否影响巴西民众对同性恋及同性民事结合的态度?
J Homosex. 2014;61(9):1334-49. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2014.926767.
3
Place matters: Contextualizing the roles of religion and race for understanding Americans' attitudes about homosexuality.地点很重要:将宗教和种族的作用置于背景中以理解美国人对同性恋的态度。
Soc Sci Res. 2016 May;57:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
4
Attitudes toward homosexuality among young adults: connections to gender role identity, gender-typed activities, and religiosity.年轻人对同性恋的态度:与性别角色认同、性别类型活动及宗教信仰的关联
J Homosex. 2015;62(8):1098-125. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1021635. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
5
Intragroup Differences of the Non-Religious: Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage and Same-Sex Adoption in the United States.群体内部的非宗教差异:美国对同性婚姻和同性收养的态度。
J Homosex. 2021 Jul 29;68(9):1509-1524. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2019.1701334. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Perceptions of Same-Sex Relationships and Marriage as Gender Role Violations: An Examination of Gendered Expectations (Sexism).将同性关系和婚姻视为违反性别角色的观念:对性别化期望(性别歧视)的考察。
J Homosex. 2015;62(11):1576-98. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1073038. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
Intragroup Differences of the Non-religious: Attitudes Towards Same-Sex Marriage and Same-Sex Adoption in the United States.非宗教群体的组内差异:美国对同性婚姻和同性收养的态度
J Homosex. 2021 Nov 10;68(13):2285-2300. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1736430. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
8
An analysis of factors affecting attitudes toward same-sex marriage: do the media matter?影响同性婚姻态度的因素分析:媒体重要吗?
J Homosex. 2011;58(10):1391-408. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2011.614906.
9
Same-Sex Adoption as a Welfare Alternative? Conservatism, Neoliberal Values, and Support for Adoption by Same-Sex Couples.同性收养作为一种福利选择?保守主义、新自由主义价值观与对同性伴侣收养的支持。
J Homosex. 2015;62(12):1722-45. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1078209. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Attitudes towards same-sex marriage in Portugal: predictors and scale validation.葡萄牙对同性婚姻的态度:预测因素与量表验证
Span J Psychol. 2014 Dec 19;17:E93. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2014.96.

引用本文的文献

1
Same difference, different sameness: Gender-navigating the denominational maze in a Christian African context.殊途同归,同中有异:在非洲基督教背景下应对教派迷宫中的性别问题
Relig State Soc. 2024;52(4):322-345. doi: 10.1080/09637494.2024.2351569. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Identity Matters: Religious Experiences of US based Transgender Young People.身份认同至关重要:美国跨性别青年的宗教经历。
J Relig Health. 2024 Jun;63(3):2443-2465. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01723-1. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
3
"Here in the Bible Belt, It's Predominantly Negative": Sexual Identity Stigma in the American South, 50 Years After Stonewall.
“在《圣经》地带这里,情况主要是负面的”:石墙事件五十周年后美国南部的性取向歧视
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 21;12:804064. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.804064. eCollection 2021.
4
Lifetime Prevalence and Sociodemographic Correlates of Multifactorial Discrimination Among Middle-Aged and Older Adult Men Who Have Sex with Men.中老年男男性行为者多因素歧视的终身患病率及其社会人口学相关性。
J Homosex. 2021 Aug 24;68(10):1591-1608. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2019.1702353. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
5
The Urgent Need for Research and Interventions to Address Family-Based Stigma and Discrimination Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth.亟须开展研究和干预措施,以解决针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿青年的基于家庭的污名化和歧视问题。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Oct;63(4):383-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Denial of service to same-sex and interracial couples: Evidence from a national survey experiment.拒绝为同性伴侣和跨种族伴侣提供服务:来自全国调查实验的证据。
Sci Adv. 2017 Dec 20;3(12):eaao5834. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5834. eCollection 2017 Dec.