• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型机器人心脏手术虚拟现实培训课程的验证:一项随机试验

Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Robotic Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Valdis Matthew, Chu Michael W A, Schlachta Christopher M, Kiaii Bob

机构信息

From the *Division of Cardiac Surgery, and †Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Innovations (Phila). 2015 Nov-Dec;10(6):383-8. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000222.

DOI:10.1097/IMI.0000000000000222
PMID:26680752
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Robotic cardiac surgery training has relied entirely on classical methods of surgical teaching. We sought to evaluate the impact of a virtual reality (VR) simulation curriculum to improve skill acquisition in robotic cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 20 surgical trainees to undergo a 9-exercise VR curriculum on a robotic surgical simulator or a control group that received no additional training. The trainees were then evaluated in a blinded fashion by assessing their de-identified video recordings of the following: (1) standardized robotic internal thoracic artery harvest and (2) mitral valve annuloplasty performed in porcine models, using a validated time-based scoring system and an objective intraoperative scoring tool. Postintervention assessments were compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Trainees randomized to the VR group were faster than the control group for both the internal thoracic artery harvest (957.3 ± 98.9 vs. 749.1 ± 171.9; P = 0.004) and mitral annuloplasty (580.4 ± 14.4 vs. 463.8 ± 86.4; P < 0.001) and scored significantly higher with the intraoperative scoring tool (22.8 ± 2.7 vs. 11.0 ± 4.5; P < 0.001). Additionally, the VR group achieved a proficiency level similar to our experts for both time-based scores (P = 0.624 and P = 0.967), and the intraoperative assessment (P = 0.110), whereas the control group was not able to meet this level of proficiency for any of the primary outcomes. The average duration of training to successfully complete all required tasks was 9.3 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that a VR simulation curriculum can significantly improve the efficiency and quality of learning in robotic cardiac surgery. Further evaluation of this curriculum is required for its widespread implementation in surgical training (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT#02357056).

摘要

目的

机器人心脏手术培训完全依赖于传统的外科教学方法。我们试图评估虚拟现实(VR)模拟课程对提高机器人心脏手术技能掌握的影响。

方法

我们将20名外科实习生随机分为两组,一组在机器人手术模拟器上接受9项练习的VR课程,另一组为对照组,不接受额外培训。然后,通过评估他们以下内容的匿名视频记录,以盲法对实习生进行评估:(1)标准化的机器人胸廓内动脉采集,以及(2)在猪模型中进行的二尖瓣环成形术,使用经过验证的基于时间的评分系统和客观的术中评分工具。将干预后的评估结果与基线进行比较。

结果

随机分配到VR组的实习生在胸廓内动脉采集(957.3±98.9对749.1±171.9;P = 0.004)和二尖瓣环成形术(580.4±14.4对463.8±86.4;P < 0.001)方面均比对照组更快,并且在术中评分工具上得分显著更高(22.8±2.7对11.0±4.5;P < 0.001)。此外,VR组在基于时间的评分(P = 0.624和P = 0.967)以及术中评估(P = 0.110)方面达到了与我们的专家相似的熟练水平,而对照组在任何主要结果方面都未能达到这一熟练水平。成功完成所有所需任务的平均培训时长为9.3小时。

结论

我们已经证明,VR模拟课程可以显著提高机器人心脏手术学习的效率和质量。该课程在外科培训中的广泛应用还需要进一步评估(ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT编号:02357056)。

相似文献

1
Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Training Curriculum for Robotic Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Trial.新型机器人心脏手术虚拟现实培训课程的验证:一项随机试验
Innovations (Phila). 2015 Nov-Dec;10(6):383-8. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000222.
2
Evaluation of robotic cardiac surgery simulation training: A randomized controlled trial.机器人心脏手术模拟训练的评估:一项随机对照试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jun;151(6):1498-1505.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
3
A Comparison of Robotic Simulation Performance on Basic Virtual Reality Skills: Simulator Subjective Versus Objective Assessment Tools.基础虚拟现实技能的机器人模拟性能比较:模拟器主观与客观评估工具
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1184-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.虚拟现实手术模拟训练能否提供自主且无需导师的技能学习?研究虚拟现实机器人手术模拟器的性能指标对技能学习和相关认知工作量的实际影响。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):62-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5634-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.机器人手术训练中虚拟现实模拟的现状:综述
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2169-78. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
6
Mastery-Based Virtual Reality Robotic Simulation Curriculum: The First Step Toward Operative Robotic Proficiency.基于掌握程度的虚拟现实机器人模拟课程:迈向机器人手术熟练程度的第一步。
J Surg Educ. 2017 May-Jun;74(3):477-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Feasibility, effectiveness and transferability of a novel mastery-based virtual reality robotic training platform for general surgery residents.一种新的基于掌握的虚拟现实机器人培训平台在普通外科住院医师中的可行性、有效性和可转移性。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7279-7287. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09106-z. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
8
Transferability of Virtual Reality, Simulation-Based, Robotic Suturing Skills to a Live Porcine Model in Novice Surgeons: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.虚拟现实、模拟训练的机器人缝合技能在新手外科医生中向真实猪模型的可转移性:一项单盲随机对照试验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):420-425. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
9
Evaluation of a novel universal robotic surgery virtual reality simulation proficiency index that will allow comparisons of users across any virtual reality simulation curriculum.一种新型通用机器人手术虚拟现实模拟熟练度指数的评估,该指数将允许在任何虚拟现实模拟课程之间比较用户。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5867-5875. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08609-5. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
10
Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum.虚拟现实机器人手术技能课程的熟练程度培训。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3343-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3624-5. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Satisfaction evaluation of interns with Da Vinci robot surgical demonstration training in gynecologic oncology operations.妇科肿瘤手术中实习生对达芬奇机器人手术演示培训的满意度评估
Front Public Health. 2025 May 1;13:1569153. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1569153. eCollection 2025.
2
Essential components and validation of multi-specialty robotic surgical training curricula: a systematic review.多专科机器人手术培训课程的基本组成部分与验证:一项系统综述
Int J Surg. 2025 Apr 1;111(4):2791-2809. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002284.
3
Congenital cardiac surgical simulation: bridging global workforce gaps and optimizing outcomes.
先天性心脏手术模拟:弥合全球劳动力差距并优化手术效果。
Future Cardiol. 2025 Feb;21(2):123-129. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2458402. Epub 2025 Jan 25.
4
Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.评价机器人手术技术评估中的客观工具和人工智能:系统评价。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad331.
5
Virtual Reality and Cardiac Diseases: A Systematic Review of Applications and Effects.虚拟现实与心脏疾病:应用及效果的系统评价。
J Healthc Eng. 2023 May 30;2023:8171057. doi: 10.1155/2023/8171057. eCollection 2023.
6
Simulation-based training in cardiac surgery: a systematic review.心脏外科基于模拟的培训:一项系统综述
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Aug 3;37(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad079.
7
Consensus statement on aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy in the UK healthcare setting.英国医疗保健环境下经前右侧小开胸行主动脉瓣置换术的共识声明。
Open Heart. 2023 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002194.
8
Systematic review of academic robotic surgery curricula.学术机器人手术课程的系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):719-743. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01500-y. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
9
The Virtual Reality Technology Effects and Features in Cardiology Interventions Training: A Scoping Review.虚拟现实技术在心脏介入培训中的效果与特点:一项范围综述
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Jul 11;36:77. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.77. eCollection 2022.
10
Clinical translation of surgical simulated closure of a ventricular septum defect.临床翻译:心室间隔缺损的手术模拟闭合。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Aug 3;35(3). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac122.