Patel A, Sayuk G S, Kushnir V M, Chan W W, Gyawali C P
Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology, John Cochran VA Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Apr;28(4):513-21. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12745. Epub 2015 Dec 20.
Combinations of reflux parameters (acid exposure time, AET; symptom association probability, SAP) on pH-impedance monitoring describe varying confidence in reflux evidence. We compared outcomes between phenotypes with distinct pre-identified reflux parameters.
In this observational cohort study, patients undergoing pH-impedance testing over a 5-year period were phenotyped by strength of reflux evidence as strong (abnormal AET, positive SAP), good (abnormal AET, negative SAP), reflux hypersensitivity (RH, normal AET, positive SAP), and equivocal evidence of reflux, and compared to two historical institutional pH monitoring cohorts. Symptom burden (dominant symptom intensity, DSI; global symptom severity, GSS) was assessed by questionnaire at baseline and on prospective follow-up and compared between phenotypes.
Of 94 patients tested off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, baseline symptom burden was highest with strong reflux evidence and lowest when equivocal (DSI: p = 0.01; GSS: p = 0.03 across groups). After 3.1 ± 0.2 years follow-up, symptomatic improvement with surgical or medical therapy was highest with strong or good evidence, and lowest when equivocal (DSI: p = 0.008; GSS: p = 0.005 across groups). This was most pronounced for typical symptoms (DSI: p = 0.001; GSS: 0.016 across groups), but not atypical symptoms (DSI: p = 0.6; GSS: p = 0.2). For testing on PPI therapy, only GSS followed a similar trend (GSS: p = 0.057, DSI: p = 0.3). Compared to historical cohorts with pH monitoring alone, equivocal evidence for reflux was partly replaced by RH, especially off PPI (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Phenotyping gastroesophageal reflux disease by the strength of reflux evidence on pH-impedance testing off PPI efficiently stratifies symptomatic outcome, especially for typical symptoms, and could be useful in planning management.
pH阻抗监测中的反流参数组合(酸暴露时间,AET;症状关联概率,SAP)描述了反流证据的不同可信度。我们比较了具有明确预先确定反流参数的不同表型之间的结果。
在这项观察性队列研究中,对5年内接受pH阻抗测试的患者,根据反流证据的强度进行表型分析,分为强(AET异常,SAP阳性)、良好(AET异常,SAP阴性)、反流高敏(RH,AET正常,SAP阳性)和反流证据不明确,并与两个历史机构pH监测队列进行比较。通过问卷在基线和前瞻性随访时评估症状负担(主要症状强度,DSI;总体症状严重程度,GSS),并在不同表型之间进行比较。
在94例停用质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗进行测试的患者中,反流证据强时基线症状负担最高,证据不明确时最低(DSI:组间p = 0.01;GSS:组间p = 0.03)。经过3.1±0.2年的随访,手术或药物治疗后的症状改善在证据强或良好时最高,证据不明确时最低(DSI:组间p = 0.008;GSS:组间p = 0.005)。这在典型症状中最为明显(DSI:组间p = 0.001;GSS:组间0.016),但在非典型症状中不明显(DSI:p = 0.6;GSS:p = 0.2)。对于PPI治疗时的测试,只有GSS呈现类似趋势(GSS:p = 0.057,DSI:p = 0.3)。与仅进行pH监测的历史队列相比,反流证据不明确部分被RH取代,尤其是在停用PPI时(p < 0.0001)。
通过停用PPI时pH阻抗测试的反流证据强度对胃食管反流病进行表型分析可有效分层症状结局,尤其是对于典型症状,并且在规划管理方面可能有用。