• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychosocial Distress and Quality of Life Impairment Are Associated With Symptom Severity in PPI Non-Responders With Normal Impedance-pH Profiles.在阻抗-pH 正常的质子泵抑制剂(PPI)无反应者中,心理社会困扰和生活质量受损与症状严重程度相关。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;113(1):31-38. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.263. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
2
Proton pump inhibitor responders who are not confirmed as GERD patients with impedance and pH monitoring: who are they?质子泵抑制剂反应者,经阻抗和 pH 监测未被确认为 GERD 患者:他们是谁?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12221. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
3
Role of Esophageal Motility, Acid Reflux, and of Acid Suppression in Nonobstructive Dysphagia.食管动力、酸反流和酸抑制在非梗阻性吞咽困难中的作用。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;52(7):607-613. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000903.
4
Majority of symptoms in esophageal reflux PPI non-responders are not related to reflux.大多数质子泵抑制剂无反应的食管反流患者的症状与反流无关。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Nov;27(11):1667-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12666. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
GERD phenotypes from pH-impedance monitoring predict symptomatic outcomes on prospective evaluation.pH阻抗监测得出的胃食管反流病表型可预测前瞻性评估中的症状结局。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Apr;28(4):513-21. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12745. Epub 2015 Dec 20.
6
Value of pH Impedance Monitoring While on Twice-Daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy to Identify Need for Escalation of Reflux Management.pH 阻抗监测在质子泵抑制剂每日 2 次治疗时对识别反流管理升级需求的价值。
Gastroenterology. 2021 Nov;161(5):1412-1422. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance can link PPI-responsive heartburn to reflux better than acid exposure time.反流吞咽诱发蠕动波指数和夜间基础阻抗比酸暴露时间更能将质子泵抑制剂反应性烧心与反流联系起来。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Nov;29(11). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13116. Epub 2017 May 25.
8
Impedance baseline and reflux perception in responder and non-responder non-erosive reflux disease patients.有反应和无反应的非糜烂性反流病患者的阻抗基线和反流感知
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov;47(11):1266-73. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.722674. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9
Reflux pattern and role of impedance-pH variables in predicting PPI response in patients with suspected GERD-related chronic cough.反流模式以及阻抗- pH变量在疑似GERD相关慢性咳嗽患者预测质子泵抑制剂反应中的作用。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Oct;40(8):966-73. doi: 10.1111/apt.12919. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
10
Most Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Who Failed Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy Also Have Functional Esophageal Disorders.大多数质子泵抑制剂治疗失败的胃食管反流病患者也存在功能性食管疾病。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1073-1080.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病的病理生理学
Digestion. 2025 Jun 25:1-17. doi: 10.1159/000547023.
2
Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Fat Absorption in Cystic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.质子泵抑制剂与囊性纤维化和胰腺功能不全患者的脂肪吸收:一项随机交叉试验性研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Mar;70(3):968-977. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08728-8. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
The role of hypervigilance in chronic esophageal diseases: a scoping review.过度警觉在慢性食管疾病中的作用:一项范围综述
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jun 17;9:44. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-120. eCollection 2024.
4
Behavioral Therapy for Functional Heartburn: Recommendation Statements.功能性烧心的行为治疗:推荐意见。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Aug;22(8):1709-1718.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
5
Esophageal secondary peristalsis following acid infusion and chemical clearance correlate with mucosal integrity and acid sensitivity in GERD patients.酸灌注后的食管继发性蠕动和化学清除与胃食管反流病患者的黏膜完整性及酸敏感性相关。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 29;16:17562848231179329. doi: 10.1177/17562848231179329. eCollection 2023.
6
Prevalence of Non-erosive Esophageal Phenotypes in Children: A European Multicenter Study.儿童非糜烂性食管表型的患病率:一项欧洲多中心研究。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Apr 30;29(2):156-165. doi: 10.5056/jnm22115.
7
Assessment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Among Objective Esophageal Motility and Reflux Phenotypes in Symptomatic Veterans.评估有症状退伍军人中客观食管动力和反流表型的创伤后应激障碍。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023 Sep;30(3):606-617. doi: 10.1007/s10880-022-09920-6. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
8
Association of CYP2C19 Polymorphism With Proton Pump Inhibitors Effectiveness and With Fractures in Real-Life: Retrospective Cohort Study.CYP2C19 基因多态性与质子泵抑制剂疗效及骨折的相关性:真实世界回顾性队列研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 May;111(5):1084-1092. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2552. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
9
Comparative Efficacy of Antidepressants for Symptoms Remission of Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.抗抑郁药治疗胃食管反流症状缓解的疗效比较:基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct;32(10):843-853. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2021.20607.
10
Esophageal hypervigilance is prevalent across gastroesophageal reflux disease presentations.食管高敏在胃食管反流病的各种表现中都很常见。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Aug;33(8):e14081. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14081. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of the brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire.简短食管吞咽困难问卷的编制与验证
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Dec;28(12):1854-1860. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12889. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
2
Functional Esophageal Disorders.功能性食管疾病
Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.012.
3
Majority of symptoms in esophageal reflux PPI non-responders are not related to reflux.大多数质子泵抑制剂无反应的食管反流患者的症状与反流无关。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Nov;27(11):1667-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12666. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
4
Patients with refractory reflux symptoms: What do they have and how should they be managed?难治性反流症状患者:他们患了什么病以及应如何进行治疗?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Sep;27(9):1195-201. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12644.
5
The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.《芝加哥食管动力障碍分类,第3.0版》
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
6
Proton pump inhibitor responders who are not confirmed as GERD patients with impedance and pH monitoring: who are they?质子泵抑制剂反应者,经阻抗和 pH 监测未被确认为 GERD 患者:他们是谁?
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12221. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
7
Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review.胃食管反流病的流行病学更新:系统评价。
Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):871-80. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
8
The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.**标题**:坐姿与仰卧位对食管正常压力地形图指标及芝加哥分类食管动力障碍诊断的影响。 **摘要**:背景:食管压力监测是评估食管动力障碍的金标准,但尚未标准化患者的体位。我们旨在比较仰卧位和坐姿下食管压力监测的结果,以确定最适合食管压力监测的体位。方法:前瞻性纳入了 102 例疑似食管动力障碍的患者,所有患者均进行了标准高分辨率食管测压(HRM),并在仰卧位和坐姿下进行了重复测试。结果:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的食管下括约肌(LES)静息压显著降低(分别为 11.4 ± 4.6mmHg 和 17.1 ± 5.4mmHg,P < 0.001),LES 长度显著缩短(分别为 2.8 ± 0.9cm 和 3.4 ± 1.0cm,P < 0.001)。然而,两种体位下的 LES 完整性、残余压、松弛率、食管体收缩幅度、收缩积分、蠕动波完整性和食管测压参数均无显著差异。此外,两种体位下的芝加哥分类诊断也没有显著差异。结论:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的 LES 静息压和 LES 长度降低,但食管体收缩和蠕动波完整性以及 Chicago 分类诊断不受影响。因此,坐姿可以作为一种替代仰卧位的方法进行食管压力监测。 **关键词**:食管动力障碍;压力监测;体位;仰卧位;坐姿 **摘要**:背景:食管压力监测是评估食管动力障碍的金标准,但尚未标准化患者的体位。我们旨在比较仰卧位和坐姿下食管压力监测的结果,以确定最适合食管压力监测的体位。方法:前瞻性纳入了 102 例疑似食管动力障碍的患者,所有患者均进行了标准高分辨率食管测压(HRM),并在仰卧位和坐姿下进行了重复测试。结果:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的食管下括约肌(LES)静息压显著降低(分别为 11.4 ± 4.6mmHg 和 17.1 ± 5.4mmHg,P < 0.001),LES 长度显著缩短(分别为 2.8 ± 0.9cm 和 3.4 ± 1.0cm,P < 0.001)。然而,两种体位下的 LES 完整性、残余压、松弛率、食管体收缩幅度、收缩积分、蠕动波完整性和食管测压参数均无显著差异。此外,两种体位下的芝加哥分类诊断也没有显著差异。结论:与仰卧位相比,坐姿下的 LES 静息压和 LES 长度降低,但食管体收缩和蠕动波完整性以及 Chicago 分类诊断不受影响。因此,坐姿可以作为一种替代仰卧位的方法进行食管压力监测。 **关键词**:食管动力障碍;压力监测;体位;仰卧位;坐姿
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Oct;24(10):e509-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.02001.x. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
9
Regurgitation is less responsive to acid suppression than heartburn in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病患者的反流症状对抑酸治疗的反应不如烧心敏感。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jun;10(6):612-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.01.022. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
10
Phenotypes and clinical context of hypercontractility in high-resolution esophageal pressure topography (EPT).高分辨率食管压力地形图(EPT)中高收缩力的表型和临床背景。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan;107(1):37-45. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.313. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

在阻抗-pH 正常的质子泵抑制剂(PPI)无反应者中,心理社会困扰和生活质量受损与症状严重程度相关。

Psychosocial Distress and Quality of Life Impairment Are Associated With Symptom Severity in PPI Non-Responders With Normal Impedance-pH Profiles.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;113(1):31-38. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.263. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1038/ajg.2017.263
PMID:28895583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5772841/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Up to 50% of patients with reflux symptoms do not manifest a satisfactory symptom response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Our primary aim in this study was to identify factors associated with symptom perception among PPI non-responder phenotypes.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study was performed from September 2014 to January 2017 at a single academic medical center and included PPI non-responders who underwent 24-h impedance-pH monitoring and completed a questionnaire set measuring patient-reported symptom severity, quality of life (QOL), and psychosocial distress. Participants were separated into cohorts based on impedance-pH results: on PPI: -acid exposure time (AET)/-symptom-reflux association (SRA), +AET, and -AET/+SRA; off PPI: functional (-AET/-SRA), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (+AET), and reflux hypersensitivity (RHS) (-AET/+SRA). The primary outcome was abnormal GERD symptom severity defined by GerdQ≥8.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-two participants were included. Impedance-pH on PPI was performed on 125: 72 (58%) -AET/-SRA, 42 (34%) +AET, and 11 (9%) -AET/+SRA. Among the -AET/-SRA group, younger age, higher dysphagia scores, QOL impairment, and higher brief symptom index were associated with GerdQ≥8. Among the +AET group, higher number of reflux-associated symptoms and lower distal contractile integral was associated with GerdQ≥8. Impedance-pH off PPI was performed on 67 participants: 39 (58%) functional, 16 (24%) GERD, and 12 (18%) RHS. Among the functional group, higher QOL impairment and dysphagia scores were seen with GerdQ≥8.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceptions of reflux symptoms are associated with psychosocial distress, reduced QOL, and sensation of dysphagia among PPI non-responders with normal impedance-pH. Among PPI refractory GERD patients, patient-reported symptom severity is associated with physiological differences, as opposed to psychosocial factors.

摘要

目的

多达 50%的反流症状患者对质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 治疗没有表现出满意的症状反应。我们本研究的主要目的是确定与 PPI 无反应表型的症状感知相关的因素。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性队列研究于 2014 年 9 月至 2017 年 1 月在一家学术医疗中心进行,纳入了接受 24 小时阻抗-pH 监测并完成了一套测量患者报告的症状严重程度、生活质量 (QOL) 和心理社会困扰的问卷的 PPI 无反应者。参与者根据阻抗-pH 结果分为以下队列:PPI 上:-酸暴露时间 (AET)/-症状反流关联 (SRA)、+AET 和 -AET/+SRA;PPI 下:功能性 (-AET/-SRA)、胃食管反流病 (GERD) (+AET) 和反流过度敏感 (RHS) (-AET/+SRA)。主要结局是通过 GerdQ≥8 定义的异常 GERD 症状严重程度。

结果

共纳入 192 名参与者。125 名参与者进行了 PPI 上的阻抗-pH 检查:72 名 (-AET/-SRA)、42 名 (+AET) 和 11 名 (-AET/+SRA)。在 -AET/-SRA 组中,年龄较小、吞咽困难评分较高、QOL 受损和较短的症状指数与 GerdQ≥8 相关。在 +AET 组中,与反流相关的症状较多和远端收缩积分较低与 GerdQ≥8 相关。67 名参与者进行了 PPI 下的阻抗-pH 检查:39 名 (58%)功能性、16 名 (24%)GERD 和 12 名 (18%)RHS。在功能性组中,GerdQ≥8 与较高的 QOL 受损和吞咽困难评分相关。

结论

在正常阻抗-pH 的 PPI 无反应者中,反流症状的感知与心理社会困扰、生活质量降低和吞咽困难有关。在 PPI 难治性 GERD 患者中,患者报告的症状严重程度与生理差异相关,而不是与心理社会因素相关。