Slonimsky Einat, Leibushor Naama, Aharoni Dvora, Lidar Merav, Eshed Iris
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Israel.
Rheumatology Unit, Sheba Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jul;35(7):1823-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-3151-3. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of pelvic enthesopathy on computed tomography (CT) in patients with DISH compared to matched control group. Pelvic CT examinations of patients with DISH (Resnick criteria) were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of enthesophytes at four entheseal sites bilaterally: ischial tuberosity, pubis, greater trochanter, and anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). This was compared with age- and gender-matched control group of consecutive patients with <2 flowing osteophytes on CT along the entire spine. Multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to examine the degree of difference between pelvic enthesopathy in DISH patients and controls and to estimate the potential predictive ability of the different findings. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio of the studied findings. Pelvic CTs of 210 patients (149:61, M:F; average age, 72.3 years) were evaluated: DISH group, 104 patients (74:30, M:F); matched control group, 106 patients (75:31, M:F). Mean total and local enthesopathy scores were significantly higher in the DISH group compared with the control group (total 5.03:1.9; ASIS 1.58:0.55; pubis 0.94:0.36; ischial tuberosity 1.47:0.76; greater trochanter 1.04:0.24; p < 0.001). ASIS and greater trochanter enthesophytes were the most robust contributors that significantly distinguished between patients with DISH and those without DISH. Prominent enthesophytes were more common among DISH patients (DISH:controls, 52:13, p = 0.02). Prominent pelvic enthesophytes detected on CT have a strong discriminating power between DISH and non-DISH patients. Results imply that pelvic enthesopathy may be included in the radiographic criteria for DISH.
本研究的目的是评估与匹配的对照组相比,弥漫性特发性骨肥厚(DISH)患者骨盆附着点病在计算机断层扫描(CT)上的患病率。对符合DISH(雷斯尼克标准)的患者进行骨盆CT检查,回顾性评估双侧四个附着点部位(坐骨结节、耻骨、大转子和髂前上棘)是否存在附着点骨赘。将其与年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行比较,对照组为CT显示整个脊柱骨赘少于2个的连续患者。应用多因素方差分析(ANOVA)来检验DISH患者和对照组骨盆附着点病的差异程度,并估计不同检查结果的潜在预测能力。使用逻辑回归分析来估计研究结果的比值比。对210例患者(149例男性:61例女性;平均年龄72.3岁)的骨盆CT进行了评估:DISH组104例患者(74例男性:30例女性);匹配对照组106例患者(75例男性:31例女性)。DISH组的平均总附着点病评分和局部附着点病评分显著高于对照组(总分5.03:1.9;髂前上棘1.58:0.55;耻骨0.94:0.36;坐骨结节1.47:0.76;大转子1.04:0.24;p<0.001)。髂前上棘和大转子附着点骨赘是区分DISH患者和非DISH患者的最有力因素。明显的附着点骨赘在DISH患者中更为常见(DISH组:对照组为52:13,p = 0.02)。CT上检测到的明显骨盆附着点骨赘在DISH患者和非DISH患者之间具有很强的鉴别能力。结果表明,骨盆附着点病可能纳入DISH的影像学标准。