Chen Hui, Swan Garrett, Wyble Brad
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, United States.
Cognition. 2016 Feb;147:144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
Conventional theories of cognition focus on attention as the primary determinant of working memory contents. However, here we show that about one third of observers could not report the color of a ball that they had just been specifically attending for 5-59 s. This counterintuitive result was obtained when observers repeatedly counted the passes of one of two different colored balls among actors in a video and were then unexpectedly asked to report the color of the ball that they had just tracked. Control trials demonstrated that observers' color report performance increased dramatically once they had an expectation to do so. Critically, most of the incorrect color responses were the distractor ball color, which suggested memory storage without binding. Therefore, these results, together with other recent findings argued against two opposing theories: object-based encoding and feature-based encoding. Instead, we propose a new hypothesis by suggesting that the failure to report color is because participants might only activate the color representation in long-term memory without binding it to object representation in working memory.
传统认知理论将注意力视为工作记忆内容的主要决定因素。然而,我们在此表明,约三分之一的观察者无法报告他们刚刚特意关注了5至59秒的球的颜色。当观察者在视频中反复数两个不同颜色球之一在演员之间的传球次数,然后被意外要求报告他们刚刚追踪的球的颜色时,得出了这一违反直觉的结果。对照试验表明,一旦观察者有了报告颜色的预期,他们的颜色报告表现会大幅提高。至关重要的是,大多数错误的颜色反应是干扰球的颜色,这表明记忆存储时没有进行绑定。因此,这些结果与其他近期发现一起,对两种对立理论提出了质疑:基于对象的编码和基于特征的编码。相反,我们提出了一个新假设,即无法报告颜色是因为参与者可能仅激活了长期记忆中的颜色表征,而未将其与工作记忆中的对象表征进行绑定。