Löffler Adrián I, Bourque Jamieson M
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, PO Box 800662, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee Street, Box 800158, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Jan;18(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0682-9.
Recent analyses have found that coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) portends a poor prognosis in patients with and without obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). Chest pain in the absence of epicardial CAD is a common entity. Angina caused by CMD, microvascular angina (MVA), is often indistinguishable from that caused by obstructive epicardial CAD. The recent emergence of noninvasive techniques that can identify CMD, such as stress positron-emission tomography (PET) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion imaging, allow improved identification of MVA. Using these tools, higher risk patients with MVA can be differentiated from those at lower risk in the heterogeneous population historically labeled as cardiac syndrome X. Likewise, MVA can be diagnosed in those with obstructive epicardial CAD who have persistent angina despite successful revascularization. There is little evidence to support current treatment strategies for MVA and current literature has not clearly defined CMD or whether therapy improves prognosis.
最近的分析发现,无论有无阻塞性心外膜冠状动脉疾病(CAD),冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)都预示着患者预后不良。无心外膜CAD时的胸痛是一种常见情况。由CMD引起的心绞痛,即微血管性心绞痛(MVA),通常与阻塞性心外膜CAD引起的心绞痛难以区分。最近出现的能够识别CMD的非侵入性技术,如负荷正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和心血管磁共振(CMR)心肌灌注成像,有助于更好地识别MVA。使用这些工具,可以在历史上被标记为心脏综合征X的异质性人群中,将高风险的MVA患者与低风险患者区分开来。同样,对于那些尽管成功进行了血运重建仍有心绞痛的阻塞性心外膜CAD患者,也可以诊断出MVA。几乎没有证据支持目前针对MVA的治疗策略,并且目前的文献尚未明确定义CMD或治疗是否能改善预后。