Amler N, Felder S, Mau W, Merkesdal S, Schöffski O
Lehrstuhl für Gesundheitsmanagement, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg.
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Basel, Basel.
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Jan;80(1):79-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-110678. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
In projects on early intervention, a wide variety of instruments is used for the measurement of intervention effects on preservation or restoration of ability to work. The aim of the present work was to propose an appropriate instrument or a range of appropriate instruments that enable diverse interventional approaches to be compared, and data quality to be improved.
A systematic literature search was conducted to map the currently existing measuring instruments. In addition, based on structured interviews with leaders of existing early intervention projects or representatives of other interventional approaches, knowledge and application of the measuring instruments in Germany were determined. In the context of a working meeting, a recommendation was formulated based on the results of the literature search and interviews.
There is currently no instrument that could be recommended without reservation for the stated purpose. Based on the results of the literature search and the interviews, the working group recommends using, as a first step, the Work Ability Index (WAI, focus on work ability) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI, focus on absenteeism and presenteeism). German-language versions of both questionnaires are freely available and offer a good compromise in terms of psychometric quality criteria, as well as of practicality and applicability. The measuring instruments should be developed further, with the goal of establishing an optimized instrument that combines the strengths of the two instruments.
In Germany, use of WAI and the WPAI in as many early intervention approaches as possible will help improve the database, allowing better comparability. However, the focus of further research must be to develop an optimized instrument from elements of WAI and WPAI, in order to be able to measure ability to work as well as the effects of an intervention on preservation or restoration of the ability to work, regardless of the setting.
在早期干预项目中,各种各样的工具被用于测量干预对工作能力保存或恢复的影响。本研究的目的是提出一种合适的工具或一系列合适的工具,以便能够比较不同的干预方法,并提高数据质量。
进行系统的文献检索以梳理当前现有的测量工具。此外,基于对现有早期干预项目负责人或其他干预方法代表的结构化访谈,确定了德国对这些测量工具的了解和应用情况。在一次工作会议上,根据文献检索和访谈结果制定了一项建议。
目前没有一种工具可以毫无保留地推荐用于上述目的。根据文献检索和访谈结果,工作组建议首先使用工作能力指数(WAI,关注工作能力)和工作效率与活动障碍问卷(WPAI,关注旷工和出勤主义)。这两种问卷的德语版本均可免费获取,并且在心理测量质量标准以及实用性和适用性方面提供了很好的折衷方案。应进一步开发这些测量工具,目标是建立一种结合了这两种工具优势的优化工具。
在德国,在尽可能多的早期干预方法中使用WAI和WPAI将有助于改善数据库,实现更好的可比性。然而,进一步研究的重点必须是从WAI和WPAI的要素中开发一种优化工具,以便能够测量工作能力以及干预对工作能力保存或恢复的影响,而不受环境限制。