Prasad Manishi, Wahlqvist Peter, Shikiar Rich, Shih Ya-Chen Tina
MEDTAP International, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(4):225-44. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422040-00002.
Health impairment often leads to work impairment in the form of both absenteeism and presenteeism (i.e. reduced productivity while at work). Several self-report productivity instruments have been designed over the past few years to measure the impact of illness on productivity at work and/or in non-work activities. In a review of the literature we identified six generic subjective instruments - the Endicott Work Productivity Scale, Health and Labor Questionnaire, Health and Work Questionnaire, Health and Work Performance Questionnaire, Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) - that could theoretically be used in any working population. These instruments were usually validated against other subjective measures (such as health-related QOL). Each productivity instrument has benefits in certain research settings, but the psychometric properties of the WPAI have been assessed most extensively. It was the most frequently used instrument and has also been modified to measure productivity reductions associated with specific diseases (e.g. allergic rhinitis, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, chronic hand dermatitis). The WLQ has also been tested extensively to measure the general health impact and impact of specific conditions. Two migraine-specific subjective instruments were also identified: the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire and the Migraine Work and Productivity Loss Questionnaire, of which the latter was found to have better psychometric properties. Productivity outcomes are useful in that they characterise the impact of an illness in the workplace and show the effect of treatment on productivity. Evidence of psychometric properties and generalisability of different instruments was found to a varying degree. Thus, further research is needed to assess the accuracy and usefulness of individual instruments in certain research settings. Health-related productivity has been increasingly recognised as an important component of the burden of illness associated with a given disease; without it, one cannot reliably assess this burden.
健康损害往往会导致旷工和出勤主义(即工作时生产力下降)等形式的工作损害。在过去几年中,已经设计了几种自我报告的生产力工具,以衡量疾病对工作和/或非工作活动中生产力的影响。在对文献的综述中,我们确定了六种通用的主观工具——恩迪科特工作生产力量表、健康与劳动问卷、健康与工作问卷、健康与工作表现问卷、工作限制问卷(WLQ)和工作生产力与活动损害问卷(WPAI)——从理论上讲,这些工具可用于任何工作人群。这些工具通常是根据其他主观测量方法(如与健康相关的生活质量)进行验证的。每种生产力工具在某些研究环境中都有其优势,但WPAI的心理测量特性得到了最广泛的评估。它是使用最频繁的工具,并且也经过了修改,以测量与特定疾病(如过敏性鼻炎、胃食管反流病、慢性手部皮炎)相关的生产力下降情况。WLQ也经过了广泛测试,以测量一般健康影响和特定病症的影响。还确定了两种针对偏头痛的主观工具:偏头痛残疾评估问卷和偏头痛工作与生产力损失问卷,其中后者被发现具有更好的心理测量特性。生产力结果很有用,因为它们描述了疾病在工作场所的影响,并显示了治疗对生产力的效果。不同工具的心理测量特性和通用性证据在不同程度上有所发现。因此,需要进一步研究以评估个别工具在某些研究环境中的准确性和实用性。与健康相关的生产力越来越被认为是与特定疾病相关的疾病负担的一个重要组成部分;没有它,就无法可靠地评估这种负担。