• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FRAIL量表的韩文版本:评估韩国老年人衰弱状态的临床可行性和有效性。

The Korean version of the FRAIL scale: clinical feasibility and validity of assessing the frailty status of Korean elderly.

作者信息

Jung Hee-Won, Yoo Hyun-Jung, Park Si-Young, Kim Sun-Wook, Choi Jung-Yeon, Yoon Sol-Ji, Kim Cheol-Ho, Kim Kwang-Il

机构信息

Geriatric Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Intern Med. 2016 May;31(3):594-600. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.331. Epub 2015 Dec 23.

DOI:10.3904/kjim.2014.331
PMID:26701231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4855093/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight (FRAIL) scale is a screening tool for frailty status using a simple 5-item questionnaire. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility and validity of the Korean version of the FRAIL (K-FRAIL) scale.

METHODS

Questionnaire items were translated and administered to 103 patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. In this cross-sectional study, the K-FRAIL scale was compared with the domains and the multidimensional frailty index of the comprehensive geriatric assessment. We also assessed the time required to complete the scale.

RESULTS

The participants' mean age was 76.8 years (standard deviation [SD], 6.1), and 55 (53.4%) were males. The mean overall frailty index was 0.19 (SD, 0.17). For K-FRAIL-robust, prefrail, and frail patients, the mean frailty indices were 0.09, 0.18, and 0.34, respectively (p for trend < 0.001). A higher degree of impairment in the K-FRAIL scale was associated with worse nutritional status, poor physical performance, functional dependence, and polypharmacy. The number of items with impairment in the K-FRAIL scale was positively associated with the frailty index (B = 3.73, p < 0.001). The K-FRAIL scale could differentiate vulnerability from robustness with a sensitivity of 0.90 and a specificity of 0.33. Of all patients, 75 (72.8%) completed the K-FRAIL scale within < 3 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

The K-FRAIL scale is correlated with the frailty index and is a simple tool to screen for frailty in a clinical setting.

摘要

背景/目的:疲劳、抵抗力、活动能力、疾病和体重减轻(FRAIL)量表是一种使用简单的5项问卷来筛查衰弱状态的工具。本研究的目的是评估韩文版FRAIL(K-FRAIL)量表的临床可行性和有效性。

方法

对在首尔国立大学盆唐医院接受综合老年评估的103名年龄≥65岁的患者进行问卷项目翻译并发放问卷。在这项横断面研究中,将K-FRAIL量表与综合老年评估的各领域及多维衰弱指数进行比较。我们还评估了完成该量表所需的时间。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为76.8岁(标准差[SD],6.1),55名(53.4%)为男性。平均总体衰弱指数为0.19(SD,0.17)。对于K-FRAIL量表评定为强壮、前期衰弱和衰弱的患者,平均衰弱指数分别为0.09、0.18和0.34(趋势p<0.001)。K-FRAIL量表中更高程度的损伤与更差的营养状况、较差的身体表现、功能依赖和多重用药相关。K-FRAIL量表中存在损伤的项目数量与衰弱指数呈正相关(B = 3.73,p < 0.001)。K-FRAIL量表能够以0.90的敏感性和0.33的特异性区分脆弱与强壮。在所有患者中,75名(72.8%)在不到3分钟内完成了K-FRAIL量表。

结论

K-FRAIL量表与衰弱指数相关,是在临床环境中筛查衰弱的一种简单工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1f/4855093/8ddcd70c4461/kjim-2014-331f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1f/4855093/8ddcd70c4461/kjim-2014-331f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1f/4855093/8ddcd70c4461/kjim-2014-331f1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Korean version of the FRAIL scale: clinical feasibility and validity of assessing the frailty status of Korean elderly.FRAIL量表的韩文版本:评估韩国老年人衰弱状态的临床可行性和有效性。
Korean J Intern Med. 2016 May;31(3):594-600. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.331. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
2
Feasibility and Factor Structure of the FRAIL Scale in Older Adults.衰弱量表在老年人中的可行性和因子结构。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):367.e11-367.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.067. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
Korean version of the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses and Loss of weight questionnaire versus the Modified Kihon Checklist for Frailty Screening in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Aging Study of PyeongChang Rural Area.《疲劳、抵抗、活动、疾病和体重减轻问卷的韩文版与改良的健康检查表在社区居住的老年人虚弱筛查中的比较:平昌农村地区的老龄化研究》
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Nov;17(11):2046-2052. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13017. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Frailty Screening in the Community Using the FRAIL Scale.社区中使用 FRAIL 量表进行虚弱筛查。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 May 1;16(5):412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.087. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
5
Clinical Frailty Scale, K-FRAIL questionnaire, and clinical outcomes in an acute hospitalist unit in Korea.韩国急性内科病房的临床虚弱量表、K-FRAIL 问卷和临床结局。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(5):1233-1241. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.677. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
FRAIL Questionnaire Screening Tool and Short-Term Outcomes in Geriatric Fracture Patients.衰弱问卷筛查工具与老年骨折患者短期结局的关系。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1082-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
German translation, cross-cultural adaptation and diagnostic test accuracy of three frailty screening tools : PRISMA-7, FRAIL scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator.三种衰弱筛查工具的德语翻译、跨文化调适及诊断测试准确性:PRISMA-7、衰弱量表和格罗宁根衰弱指标
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Apr;51(3):282-292. doi: 10.1007/s00391-017-1295-2. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
8
Instruments to assess sarcopenia and physical frailty in older people living in a community (care) setting: similarities and discrepancies.用于评估社区(护理)环境中老年人肌肉减少症和身体虚弱的工具:异同点
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Apr;16(4):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
9
The prevalence of frailty and related factors in community-dwelling Turkish elderly according to modified Fried Frailty Index and FRAIL scales.根据改良的弗里德衰弱指数和衰弱量表评估土耳其社区老年人衰弱的患病率及相关因素。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015 Oct;27(5):703-9. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0337-0. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Frailty Screening Tools for Elderly Patients Incident to Dialysis.老年透析患者衰弱筛查工具。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):1480-1488. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11801116. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Three Frailty Assessment Tools: A Cross-Sectional Study.三种衰弱评估工具的比较分析:一项横断面研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251363877. doi: 10.1177/00469580251363877. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
2
Development of the Korean enhanced recovery after surgery audit program.韩国术后加速康复审计项目的开展
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 28;15(1):27409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10622-w.
3
The characterization of frailty in spine surgery: a systematic review of frailty indices.脊柱手术中衰弱的特征:衰弱指数的系统评价

本文引用的文献

1
Multidimensional frailty score for the prediction of postoperative mortality risk.多维虚弱评分预测术后死亡风险。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jul;149(7):633-40. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.241.
2
A comparison of four frailty models.四种虚弱模型的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Apr;62(4):721-6. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12735. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
3
Prevalence and outcomes of frailty in Korean elderly population: comparisons of a multidimensional frailty index with two phenotype models.韩国老年人群体中衰弱的患病率及结局:多维衰弱指数与两种表型模型的比较
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09159-3.
4
2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.《2025年韩国糖尿病管理临床实践指南:韩国糖尿病协会的建议》
Diabetes Metab J. 2025 Jul;49(4):582-783. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2025.0469. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
5
Unsupervised Frailty Intervention by Digitalized Exercise Coaching: A Feasibility Study.数字化运动指导的无监督衰弱干预:一项可行性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;25(12):3674. doi: 10.3390/s25123674.
6
Phase angle as a prognostic factor for postoperative outcomes in major abdominal surgery: a single-center prospective observational study.相位角作为腹部大手术术后结局的预后因素:一项单中心前瞻性观察性研究。
J Anesth. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03526-6.
7
Comparison of the Frailty Phenotype and the Korean Version of the FRAIL Scale.衰弱表型与韩国版衰弱量表的比较。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 5;13(11):1352. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111352.
8
Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Physical Frailty Among Older Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Dual Mediation Model.老年冠心病患者感知到的社会支持与身体虚弱之间的关系:一种双重中介模型
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 5;14(5):1744. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051744.
9
Digital assessment of walking ability: Validity and reliability of the automated figure-of-eight walk test in older adults.步行能力的数字评估:老年人自动化8字步行测试的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0316612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316612. eCollection 2025.
10
Comparative analysis of frailty identification tools in community services across the Asia-Pacific: A systematic review and meta-analysis.亚太地区社区服务中衰弱识别工具的比较分析:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Apr;29(4):100496. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2025.100496. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087958. eCollection 2014.
4
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.2014年糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jan;37 Suppl 1:S14-80. doi: 10.2337/dc14-S014.
5
Frailty in elderly people.老年人虚弱。
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
6
Gait speed as a measure in geriatric assessment in clinical settings: a systematic review.步态速度作为临床老年评估中的一种测量方法:系统评价。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):39-46. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls174. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
7
Comparison of frailty indicators based on clinical phenotype and the multiple deficit approach in predicting mortality and physical limitation.基于临床表型和多种缺陷方法的虚弱指标比较在预测死亡率和身体限制方面的应用。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Aug;60(8):1478-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04074.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
8
A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans.一个简单的虚弱问卷(FRAIL)可以预测中年非裔美国人的结局。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2012 Jul;16(7):601-8. doi: 10.1007/s12603-012-0084-2.
9
Evaluation of multidimensional geriatric assessment as a predictor of mortality and cardiovascular events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.评价多维老年评估对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后死亡率和心血管事件的预测价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May;5(5):489-496. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.02.012.
10
Gait speed and survival in older adults.老年人的步速与生存。
JAMA. 2011 Jan 5;305(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1923.