Kong Hyun-Ho, Shin Kwangsoo, Yang Dong-Seok, Gu Hye-Young, Joo Hyeon-Seong, Shon Hyun-Chul
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0316612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316612. eCollection 2025.
The Figure-of-Eight Walk Test (F8WT) can assess straight- and curved-path walking ability, but the validity and reliability of automated measurement of the F8WT using digital device has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to verify the validity (method comparison) and test-retest reliability of the automated FW8T (aFW8T) using a digital device based on image analysis by comparing the results of the aF8WT with those of the manual F8WT (mF8WT).
Community-dwelling older adults underwent the mF8WT performed by a physiotherapist and the aF8WT using the Digital Senior Fitness Test system. To verify the test-retest reliability, the aF8WT was administered again to a randomly selected group of participants one week after the baseline test. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation analysis were used to verify the degree of agreement between the results of and correlation between the mF8WT and aF8WT, respectively. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the limits of agreement (LoA) was obtained using Bland-Altman analysis.
The analysis included 83 participants (mean age 71.6 ± 4.7 years). The participants' mF8WT and aF8WT results were 29.1 ± 4.9 and 29.8 ± 4.9 seconds, respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis showed a very strong correlation between the mF8WT and aF8WT results with r = 0.91 (p < 0.001), and the ICC between the mF8WT and aF8WT results was 0.95 (0.91-0.97), showing excellent agreement. The 95% CI of the LoA was -0.7 (-4.8 to 3.3) seconds in the Bland-Altman analysis. In an analysis of the test-retest reliability of the aF8WT, participants' aF8WT results were 30.9 ± 4.7 seconds (baseline) and 29.6 ± 4.9 seconds (retest), with an ICC of 0.94 (0.81-0.98, p < 0.001), indicating excellent reliability.
Automated measurement of the F8WT using a digital device showed excellent validity and reliability. The aF8WT can be used to assess and monitor the walking ability of community-dwelling older adults.
“8 字形步行试验”(F8WT)能够评估直线和曲线行走能力,但使用数字设备对 F8WT 进行自动测量的有效性和可靠性尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是通过比较自动 F8WT(aF8WT)与手动 F8WT(mF8WT)的结果,验证基于图像分析的数字设备自动 F8WT(aF8WT)的有效性(方法比较)和重测信度。
社区居住的老年人接受了由物理治疗师进行的 mF8WT 和使用数字高级体能测试系统进行的 aF8WT。为了验证重测信度,在基线测试一周后,对随机选择的一组参与者再次进行 aF8WT。组内相关系数(ICC)和 Pearson 相关分析分别用于验证 mF8WT 和 aF8WT 结果之间的一致性程度和相关性。使用 Bland - Altman 分析获得一致性界限(LoA)的 95%置信区间(CI)。
分析纳入了 83 名参与者(平均年龄 71.6 ± 4.7 岁)。参与者的 mF8WT 和 aF8WT 结果分别为 29.1 ± 4.9 秒和 29.8 ± 4.9 秒。Pearson 相关分析显示 mF8WT 和 aF8WT 结果之间具有非常强的相关性,r = 0.91(p < 0.001),mF8WT 和 aF8WT 结果之间的 ICC 为 0.95(0.91 - 0.97),显示出极好的一致性。Bland - Altman 分析中 LoA 的 95%CI 为 -0.7(-4.8 至 3.3)秒。在 aF8WT 的重测信度分析中,参与者的 aF8WT 结果在基线时为 30.9 ± 4.7 秒,重测时为 29.6 ± 4.9 秒,ICC 为 0.94(0.81 - 0.98,p < 0.001),表明具有极好的信度。
使用数字设备对 F8WT 进行自动测量显示出极好的有效性和可靠性。aF8WT 可用于评估和监测社区居住老年人的行走能力。