Worbs Sylvia, Fiebig Uwe, Zeleny Reinhard, Schimmel Heinz, Rummel Andreas, Luginbühl Werner, Dorner Brigitte G
Biological Toxins, Centre for Biological Threats and Special Pathogens, Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Retieseweg 111, 2440 Geel, Belgium.
Toxins (Basel). 2015 Nov 26;7(12):4935-66. doi: 10.3390/toxins7124857.
In the framework of the EU project EQuATox, a first international proficiency test (PT) on the detection and quantification of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) was conducted. Sample materials included BoNT serotypes A, B and E spiked into buffer, milk, meat extract and serum. Different methods were applied by the participants combining different principles of detection, identification and quantification. Based on qualitative assays, 95% of all results reported were correct. Successful strategies for BoNT detection were based on a combination of complementary immunological, MS-based and functional methods or on suitable functional in vivo/in vitro approaches (mouse bioassay, hemidiaphragm assay and Endopep-MS assay). Quantification of BoNT/A, BoNT/B and BoNT/E was performed by 48% of participating laboratories. It turned out that precise quantification of BoNT was difficult, resulting in a substantial scatter of quantitative data. This was especially true for results obtained by the mouse bioassay which is currently considered as "gold standard" for BoNT detection. The results clearly demonstrate the urgent need for certified BoNT reference materials and the development of methods replacing animal testing. In this context, the BoNT PT provided the valuable information that both the Endopep-MS assay and the hemidiaphragm assay delivered quantitative results superior to the mouse bioassay.
在欧盟项目EQuATox框架内,开展了首次关于肉毒杆菌神经毒素(BoNT)检测与定量的国际能力验证试验(PT)。样品材料包括添加到缓冲液、牛奶、肉提取物和血清中的A、B和E型BoNT。参与者采用了不同方法,结合了不同的检测、鉴定和定量原理。基于定性分析,所报告的所有结果中有95%是正确的。成功的BoNT检测策略基于互补的免疫、基于质谱和功能方法的组合,或基于合适的体内/体外功能方法(小鼠生物测定法、半膈肌测定法和内肽酶-质谱测定法)。48%的参与实验室对BoNT/A、BoNT/B和BoNT/E进行了定量。结果表明,BoNT的精确定量很困难,导致定量数据存在大量离散。对于目前被视为BoNT检测“金标准”的小鼠生物测定法所获得的结果尤其如此。结果清楚地表明迫切需要经认证的BoNT参考材料以及开发替代动物试验的方法。在此背景下,BoNT能力验证试验提供了有价值的信息,即内肽酶-质谱测定法和半膈肌测定法所提供的定量结果均优于小鼠生物测定法。