Cresswell E N, Goff M G, Nguyen T M, Lee W X, Hernandez C J
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
J Biomech. 2016 Jan 25;49(2):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.011. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
Bone adapts to mechanical stimuli. While in vivo mechanical loading has been shown to increase the density of cancellous bone, theory suggests that the relationship between tissue stress/strain and subsequent bone formation occurs at the scale of individual trabeculae. Here we examine bone formation one week following mechanical stimulus. Three bouts of cyclic loading (300 cycles/day on 3 consecutive days) were applied to caudal vertebrae of female rats (n=7). Bone formation was determined using three-dimensional images of fluorescent markers of bone formation (0.7×0.7×5.0μm(3)) and local tissue stress/strain was determined using high-resolution finite element models. Three days of mechanical stimuli resulted in an increase in mineralizing surface (loaded: 17.68±2.17%; control: 9.05±3.20%; mean±SD) and an increase in the volume of bone formed (loaded: 7.09±1.97%; control: 1.44±0.50%). The number of bone formation sites was greater in loaded animals (650.71±118.54) than pinned not loaded controls (310.71±91.55), a difference that was explained by the number of formation sites at regions with large local tissue strain energy density (SED). In addition, the probability of observing bone formation was greater at locations of the microstructure experiencing greater SED, but did not exceed 32%, consistent with prior work. Our findings demonstrate that bone formation in the week following a short term mechanical stimulus occurs near regions of bone tissue experiencing high tissue SED, although the ability of finite element models to predict the locations of bone formation remains modest and further improvements may require accounting for additional factors such as osteocyte distribution or fluid flow.
骨骼会适应机械刺激。虽然体内机械负荷已被证明可增加松质骨密度,但理论表明组织应力/应变与随后的骨形成之间的关系发生在单个小梁的尺度上。在此,我们研究机械刺激一周后的骨形成情况。对雌性大鼠(n = 7)的尾椎施加三轮循环负荷(连续3天,每天300次循环)。使用骨形成荧光标记物的三维图像(0.7×0.7×5.0μm(3))确定骨形成情况,并使用高分辨率有限元模型确定局部组织应力/应变。三天的机械刺激导致矿化表面增加(负荷组:17.68±2.17%;对照组:9.05±3.20%;平均值±标准差)以及形成的骨体积增加(负荷组:7.09±1.97%;对照组:1.44±0.50%)。负荷动物的骨形成部位数量(650.71±118.54)多于未负荷的固定对照组(310.71±91.55),这种差异可由局部组织应变能密度(SED)大的区域的形成部位数量来解释。此外,在微观结构中SED较大的位置观察到骨形成的概率更高,但不超过32%,这与先前的研究一致。我们的研究结果表明,短期机械刺激后一周内的骨形成发生在骨组织中局部组织SED较高的区域附近,尽管有限元模型预测骨形成位置的能力仍然有限,进一步的改进可能需要考虑其他因素,如骨细胞分布或流体流动。