Bersamin Melina, Garbers Samantha, Gold Melanie A, Heitel Jennifer, Martin Kathryn, Fisher Deborah A, Santelli John
Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Oakland, California.
Heilbrunn Department of Population & Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jan;58(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.018.
Since the founding of the first school-based health centers (SBHCs) >45 years ago, researchers have attempted to measure their impact on child and adolescent physical and mental health and academic outcomes. A review of the literature finds that SBHC evaluation studies have been diverse, encompassing different outcomes and varying target populations, study periods, methodological designs, and scales. A complex picture emerges of the impact of SBHCs on health outcomes, which may be a function of the specific health outcomes examined, the health needs of specific communities and schools, the characteristics of the individuals assessed, and/or the specific constellation of SBHC services. SBHC evaluations face numerous challenges that affect the interpretation of evaluation findings, including maturation, self-selection, low statistical power, and displacement effects. Using novel approaches such as implementing a multipronged approach to maximize participation, entering-class proxy-baseline design, propensity score methods, data set linkage, and multisite collaboration may mitigate documented challenges in SBHC evaluation.
自45多年前首批校内健康中心(SBHC)成立以来,研究人员一直试图衡量它们对儿童和青少年身心健康及学业成绩的影响。对相关文献的综述发现,SBHC评估研究多种多样,涵盖不同的结果、不同的目标人群、研究周期、方法设计和规模。SBHC对健康结果的影响呈现出一幅复杂的图景,这可能取决于所研究的具体健康结果、特定社区和学校的健康需求、被评估个体的特征,和/或SBHC服务的具体组合。SBHC评估面临诸多影响评估结果解读的挑战,包括成熟度、自我选择、统计效力低和替代效应。采用新方法,如实施多管齐下的方法以最大限度地提高参与度、课堂内代理基线设计、倾向得分法、数据集关联和多地点合作,可能会减轻SBHC评估中已记录的挑战。