Shangguan Xun, Dong Baijun, Wang Yanqing, Xu Fan, Shao Xiaoguang, Sha Jianjun, Zhu Yinjie, Pan Jiahua, Xue Wei
Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1630 Dong Fang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;143(1):123-129. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2262-9. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
To evaluate the ability of the new Gleason grade groups (GGGs) to stratify risk in prostate cancer patients with locally adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy (RP) thereby allowing more accurate assessment for planning eventual adjuvant therapy.
Data on 172 patients with locally adverse pathologic features (including seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, or positive surgical margins) who had been treated with wait and see policy after RP were retrospectively analyzed for biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to test the association between the GGGs and BCR. Finally, concordance indices of different grading classifications were calculated to evaluate the predictive accuracy for biochemical failure after RP.
The five-year BCR-free survival rates were 71.2, 66.9, 25.7, 17.4, and 8.3 % for GGG 1-5 assessed on surgical specimens (p < 0.001, log-rank test). In the two-way log-rank test, men with prostatectomy GGG 2 had a lower progression risk relative to GGG 3 (p = 0.001), though similar risk as GGG 1 (p = 0.105). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, specimen GGG ≥3 and early postoperative PSA ≥0.1 ng/ml were independent risk factors for biochemical failure (p < 0.001). In addition, GGGs had higher predictive accuracy compared with the alternate classification system (improvement in concordance index by 0.036-0.141).
For the appropriate patient, depending on age, physical condition, early postoperative PSA, patient desire, etc., could be a candidate for wait and see policy with specimen GGG 2 disease, so to distinguish this from GGG 3 may facilitate discussions at the point of treatment decision making.
评估新的Gleason分级组(GGGs)对前列腺癌根治术(RP)后具有局部不良病理特征患者进行风险分层的能力,从而为规划最终的辅助治疗提供更准确的评估。
回顾性分析172例具有局部不良病理特征(包括精囊侵犯、包膜外扩展或手术切缘阳性)且RP后采取观察等待策略的患者的生化复发(BCR)无进展生存期数据。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险回归模型来检验GGGs与BCR之间的关联。最后,计算不同分级分类的一致性指数,以评估RP后生化失败的预测准确性。
手术标本评估的GGG 1-5患者的五年BCR无进展生存率分别为71.2%、66.9%、25.7%、17.4%和8.3%(p<0.001,对数秩检验)。在双向对数秩检验中,前列腺切除术GGG 2的男性相对于GGG 3具有较低的进展风险(p = 0.001),但与GGG 1风险相似(p = 0.105)。在多变量Cox回归分析中,标本GGG≥3和术后早期PSA≥0.1 ng/ml是生化失败的独立危险因素(p<0.001)。此外,与替代分类系统相比,GGGs具有更高的预测准确性(一致性指数提高0.036-0.141)。
对于合适的患者,根据年龄、身体状况、术后早期PSA、患者意愿等因素,标本GGG 2疾病的患者可能是观察等待策略的候选者,因此将其与GGG 3区分开来可能有助于在治疗决策点进行讨论。