Scott Aaron, McCluskey Brian, Brown-Reid Monica, Grear Dan, Pitcher Paul, Ramos Greg, Spencer Denise, Singrey Aaron
US Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services/Veterinary Services, 2150 Centre Ave, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
US Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services/Veterinary Services, 2150 Centre Ave, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Jan 1;123:192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) was identified in the United States in the spring of 2013, and professionals from many parts of the U.S. swine industry responded rapidly to understand and control the newly emerging disease. In less than two months, the disease had spread to more than 200 herds in thirteen states. Experts from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) engaged in laboratory diagnostics, analytic support, epidemiology expertise, and data management to facilitate the effort. By 2014, a great deal had been learned about the disease; however, the question of how it entered the United States remained unanswered. In 2014, USDA formed an investigative group to address the question and leverage current knowledge with resources and partnerships not readily available to non-federal investigators. The group formed collaborations with other government and non-government organizations and individuals, and followed many avenues of inquiry; ultimately arriving at a small number of scenarios that describe possible mechanisms for PED introduction. For a scenario to be plausible, it had to explain: contamination of a person or product in the source country, its transit and entry to the United States, rapid dispersal across a wide geographic area, and exposure/infection of pigs. It had to be compatible with findings of swine herd investigations and research studies. Potential products had to have been imported legally during the time prior to the beginning of the epidemic, or delivered to the United States through prohibited channels. Follow-up studies were initiated to gather more evidence for the most plausible scenarios. Of the scenarios, flexible intermediate bulk containers ("feed totes") used to transport bulk feed serving as fomites for movement of PED virus provided the simplest explanation for the accumulated findings of the investigation.
2013年春季,美国确认出现了猪流行性腹泻(PED),美国养猪业多个地区的专业人员迅速做出反应,以了解和控制这种新出现的疾病。在不到两个月的时间里,该疾病已蔓延至13个州的200多个猪群。美国农业部(USDA)的专家参与了实验室诊断、分析支持、流行病学专业知识和数据管理工作,以推动这项工作。到2014年,人们对这种疾病已经有了很多了解;然而,它是如何进入美国的问题仍未得到解答。2014年,美国农业部成立了一个调查小组来解决这个问题,并利用现有知识以及非联邦调查人员难以获得的资源和伙伴关系。该小组与其他政府和非政府组织及个人建立了合作关系,并进行了多条调查途径;最终得出了少数几种描述PED传入可能机制的情况。要使一种情况合理,它必须解释:源国的人员或产品受到污染、其运输和进入美国的过程、在广泛地理区域的迅速传播以及猪的接触/感染情况。它必须与猪群调查和研究的结果相符。潜在产品必须在疫情开始前的那段时间合法进口,或者通过违禁渠道运抵美国。随后展开了后续研究,以收集更多证据来支持最合理的情况。在这些情况中,用于运输散装饲料的柔性中型散装容器(“饲料周转箱”)作为PED病毒传播的媒介,为调查的累积结果提供了最简单的解释。