Blomme Allison K, Jones Cassandra K, Gebhardt Jordan T, Woodworth Jason C, Paulk Chad B
Department of Grain Science and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Jan;69(1):137-148. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14284. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
Soy-based products are known to pose a viable risk to U.S. swine herds because of their ability to harbour and transmit virus. This publication aimed to evaluate soy imports into the United States as a whole and from foreign animal disease positive (FAD-positive) countries to determine which products are being imported in the highest quantities and observe potential trends in imports from FAD-positive countries. Import data were accessed through the United States International Trade Commission website (USITC DataWeb) and summarized using R (version 4.0.2, R core team, Vienna, Austria). Twenty-one different Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes were queried to determine quantities (metric tonnes, MT) and breakdown of different soy product types being imported into the United States from 2015 to 2020. A total of 78 different countries exported soy products to the United States in 2019 and 2020 with top contributors being Canada (546,467 and 481,497 MT, respectively), India (397,858 and 430,621 MT, respectively) and Argentina (122,116 and 79,471 MT, respectively). Soy oilcake (582,273 MT) was imported in the largest quantities, followed by organic soybeans (270,194 MT) and soy oil (134,436 MT) for 2020. Of the 78 countries, 46 had cases of FAD reported through the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) World Animal Health Information Database (WAHIS). Top exporters of soy products to the United States from FAD-positive countries in 2019 and 2020 were India (397,858 and 430,621 MT, respectively), Argentina (122,116 MT in 2019) and Ukraine (40,293 and 56,392 MT, respectively). The risk of FAD introduction to the United States through soy imports can fluctuate based on where FAD outbreaks are occurring, shipping methods and end usage of products. A system to monitor these factors could help make future decisions about trade and risk of FAD introduction to U.S. swine herds.
由于大豆基产品具有携带和传播病毒的能力,已知其会对美国猪群构成切实风险。本出版物旨在评估美国整体以及来自动物疫病阳性(FAD阳性)国家的大豆进口情况,以确定哪些产品的进口量最大,并观察来自FAD阳性国家的进口潜在趋势。通过美国国际贸易委员会网站(USITC DataWeb)获取进口数据,并使用R(版本4.0.2,R核心团队,奥地利维也纳)进行汇总。查询了21个不同的协调关税表(HTS)代码,以确定2015年至2020年期间从不同国家进口到美国的大豆产品类型的数量(公吨,MT)和细目分类。2019年和2020年共有78个不同国家向美国出口大豆产品,主要出口国为加拿大(分别为546,467公吨和481,497公吨)、印度(分别为397,858公吨和430,621公吨)和阿根廷(分别为122,116公吨和79,471公吨)。2020年,豆饼(582,273公吨)的进口量最大,其次是有机大豆(270,194公吨)和豆油(134,436公吨)。在这78个国家中,有46个国家通过世界动物卫生组织(OIE)世界动物卫生信息数据库(WAHIS)报告了动物疫病病例。2019年和2020年,向美国出口大豆产品的FAD阳性国家的主要出口国为印度(分别为397,858公吨和430,621公吨)、阿根廷(2019年为122,116公吨)和乌克兰(分别为40,293公吨和56,392公吨)。通过大豆进口将动物疫病引入美国的风险可能会因动物疫病爆发地点、运输方式和产品最终用途而有所波动。一个监测这些因素的系统有助于就贸易以及动物疫病引入美国猪群的风险做出未来决策。