Ginges Jeremy, Sheikh Hammad, Atran Scott, Argo Nichole
Department of Psychology, New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011; ARTIS International, New York, NY 10010;
ARTIS International, New York, NY 10010; Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France; John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY 10019; School of Social Anthropology and Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TD, United Kingdom; Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 12;113(2):316-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1512120113. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
Religious belief is often thought to motivate violence because it is said to promote norms that encourage tribalism and the devaluing of the lives of nonbelievers. If true, this should be visible in the multigenerational violent conflict between Palestinians and Israelis which is marked by a religious divide. We conducted experiments with a representative sample of Muslim Palestinian youth (n = 555), examining whether thinking from the perspective of Allah (God), who is the ultimate arbitrator of religious belief, changes the relative value of Jewish Israelis' lives (compared with Palestinian lives). Participants were presented with variants of the classic "trolley dilemma," in the form of stories where a man can be killed to save the lives of five children who were either Jewish Israeli or Palestinian. They responded from their own perspective and from the perspective of Allah. We find that whereas a large proportion of participants were more likely to endorse saving Palestinian children than saving Jewish Israeli children, this proportion decreased when thinking from the perspective of Allah. This finding raises the possibility that beliefs about God can mitigate bias against other groups and reduce barriers to peace.
宗教信仰常常被认为会激发暴力,因为据说它会助长某些规范,这些规范鼓励部落主义以及对非信徒生命的贬低。如果真是这样,这在以宗教分歧为特征的巴勒斯坦人和以色列人之间的多代暴力冲突中应该是显而易见的。我们对巴勒斯坦穆斯林青年的代表性样本(n = 555)进行了实验,研究从作为宗教信仰最终仲裁者的真主(上帝)的角度思考是否会改变以色列犹太人与巴勒斯坦人生命的相对价值(相对于巴勒斯坦人的生命)。参与者面对经典的“电车难题”的变体,以故事的形式呈现,即一个人可以被杀死以拯救五个孩子的生命,这些孩子要么是以色列犹太人,要么是巴勒斯坦人。他们分别从自己的角度和真主的角度做出回应。我们发现,虽然很大一部分参与者更倾向于支持拯救巴勒斯坦儿童而非拯救以色列犹太儿童,但当从真主的角度思考时,这一比例下降了。这一发现增加了这样一种可能性,即对上帝的信仰可以减轻对其他群体的偏见,并减少和平的障碍。