• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Believers' estimates of God's beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people's beliefs.信徒对上帝信仰的估计比对他人信仰的估计更自我中心。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 22;106(51):21533-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908374106. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
2
God will forgive: reflecting on God's love decreases neurophysiological responses to errors.上帝会宽恕:反思上帝的爱会降低对错误的神经生理反应。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Mar;10(3):357-63. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu096. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
3
Psychological Analysis of Religious Experience: The Construction of the Intensity of Religious Experience Scale (IRES).宗教体验的心理学分析:宗教体验强度量表(IRES)的构建。
J Relig Health. 2021 Feb;60(1):576-595. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-01084-7. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Why did this happen to me? Religious believers' and non-believers' teleological reasoning about life events.为什么这会发生在我身上?宗教信徒和非信徒对生活事件的目的论推理。
Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):277-303. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
5
The faces of God in America: Revealing religious diversity across people and politics.美国的上帝面孔:揭示跨越人群和政治的宗教多样性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 11;13(6):e0198745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198745. eCollection 2018.
6
Neural consequences of religious belief on self-referential processing.宗教信仰对自我参照加工的神经影响。
Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/17470910701469681.
7
The role of religious context in children's differentiation between God's mind and human minds.宗教背景对儿童区分上帝思维和人类思维的作用。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2017 Mar;35(1):37-59. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12160. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
8
My mind, your mind, and God's mind: How children and adults conceive of different agents' moral beliefs.我的心智、你的心智和上帝的心智:儿童和成人如何构想不同主体的道德信仰。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Sep;36(3):467-481. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12231. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
9
God and the Welfare State - Substitutes or Complements? An Experimental Test of the Effect of Belief in God's Control.上帝与福利国家——替代还是互补?对上帝掌控信念影响的一项实验测试
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0128858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128858. eCollection 2015.
10
The Importance of Terminal Values and Religious Experience of God's Presence and God's Absence in the Lives of University Students with Various Levels of Empathy.不同共情水平的大学生生活中终极价值观以及上帝存在与上帝缺席的宗教体验的重要性。
J Relig Health. 2015 Jun;54(3):1052-67. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9884-5.

引用本文的文献

1
After we transgress God's values: relational spirituality as a paradigm for the Christian experience of reconciliation with God.在我们违背上帝的价值观之后:关系性灵性作为基督徒与上帝和解经历的一种范式。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 9;16:1587704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587704. eCollection 2025.
2
God's mind on morality.上帝关于道德的看法。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jan 11;3:e6. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.1. eCollection 2021.
3
What shall we call God? An exploration of metaphors coded from descriptions of God from a large U.S. undergraduate sample.我们应该如何称呼上帝?对美国大学生群体中对上帝描述的隐喻进行的探索。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0254626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254626. eCollection 2021.
4
The "Who" System of the Human Brain: A System for Social Cognition About the Self and Others.人类大脑的“自我认知”系统:一个关于自我与他人的社会认知系统。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jun 19;14:224. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00224. eCollection 2020.
5
Who Believes in ESP: Cognitive and Motivational Determinants of the Belief in Extra-Sensory Perception.谁相信超感官知觉:对超感官知觉信念的认知和动机决定因素
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;15(1):120-139. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1689. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Perceiving Self, Others, and Events Through a Religious Lens: Mahayana Buddhists vs. Christians.透过宗教视角感知自我、他人与事件:大乘佛教徒与基督教徒之比较
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 6;10:217. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00217. eCollection 2019.
7
Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples.异质处理效应估计在样本间的可推广性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Dec 4;115(49):12441-12446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808083115. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
The faces of God in America: Revealing religious diversity across people and politics.美国的上帝面孔:揭示跨越人群和政治的宗教多样性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 11;13(6):e0198745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198745. eCollection 2018.
9
Does social distance modulate adults' egocentric biases when reasoning about false beliefs?社会距离是否会调节成年人在推理虚假信念时的自我中心偏见?
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 8;13(6):e0198616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198616. eCollection 2018.
10
Mentalizing skills do not differentiate believers from non-believers, but credibility enhancing displays do.心理化技能并不能区分信徒和非信徒,但可信度增强展示却能做到。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0182764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182764. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.见人如己:拟人化的三因素理论。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):864-86. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864.
2
Self-projection and the brain.自我投射与大脑。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;11(2):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
3
The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex.内侧前额叶皮质中社会认知与自我参照思维之间的联系。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1306-15. doi: 10.1162/0898929055002418.
4
Explanations versus applications: the explanatory power of valuable beliefs.解释与应用:有价值信念的解释力
Psychol Sci. 2005 Oct;16(10):826-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01621.x.
5
Strategies for social inference: a similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates.社会推理策略:属性流行率估计中投射与刻板印象的相似性权变模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Nov;87(5):573-85. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.573.
6
Inside the mind reader's tool kit: projection and stereotyping in mental state inference.读心者的工具包:心理状态推断中的投射与刻板印象
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):340-53. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.340.
7
Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.将换位思考视为以自我为中心的锚定与调整。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Sep;87(3):327-39. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327.
8
Exploring the natural foundations of religion.探索宗教的自然基础。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):29-34. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01419-9.
9
Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: anthropomorphism in God concepts.对非自然实体的概念化:上帝概念中的拟人化
Cogn Psychol. 1996 Dec;31(3):219-47. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0017.
10
The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception.真正的错误共识效应:社会认知中一种无法根除的自我中心偏差。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Oct;67(4):596-610. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.596.

信徒对上帝信仰的估计比对他人信仰的估计更自我中心。

Believers' estimates of God's beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people's beliefs.

机构信息

Booth School of Business, 5807 South Woodlawn Avenue, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 22;106(51):21533-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908374106. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0908374106
PMID:19955414
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2787468/
Abstract

People often reason egocentrically about others' beliefs, using their own beliefs as an inductive guide. Correlational, experimental, and neuroimaging evidence suggests that people may be even more egocentric when reasoning about a religious agent's beliefs (e.g., God). In both nationally representative and more local samples, people's own beliefs on important social and ethical issues were consistently correlated more strongly with estimates of God's beliefs than with estimates of other people's beliefs (Studies 1-4). Manipulating people's beliefs similarly influenced estimates of God's beliefs but did not as consistently influence estimates of other people's beliefs (Studies 5 and 6). A final neuroimaging study demonstrated a clear convergence in neural activity when reasoning about one's own beliefs and God's beliefs, but clear divergences when reasoning about another person's beliefs (Study 7). In particular, reasoning about God's beliefs activated areas associated with self-referential thinking more so than did reasoning about another person's beliefs. Believers commonly use inferences about God's beliefs as a moral compass, but that compass appears especially dependent on one's own existing beliefs.

摘要

人们在推断他人的信仰时,往往会以自我为中心,以自己的信仰作为归纳的指南。相关研究、实验和神经影像学研究的证据表明,当人们推断宗教代理人的信仰(例如上帝)时,他们可能会更加以自我为中心。在全国代表性样本和更局部的样本中,人们对重要社会和伦理问题的信仰与对上帝信仰的估计比与对其他人信仰的估计更为密切相关(研究 1-4)。操纵人们的信仰同样会影响对上帝信仰的估计,但对其他人信仰的估计影响并不一致(研究 5 和 6)。最后一项神经影像学研究表明,在推断自己的信仰和上帝的信仰时,神经活动明显趋同,但在推断另一个人的信仰时则明显不同(研究 7)。具体来说,推断上帝的信仰会激活与自我参照思维相关的区域,比推断另一个人的信仰更为强烈。信徒通常将关于上帝的信仰推断用作道德指南针,但该指南针似乎特别依赖于一个人自己现有的信仰。