Lewis Marquita W, Khodneva Yulia, Redmond Nicole, Durant Raegan W, Judd Suzanne E, Wilkinson Larrell L, Howard Virginia J, Safford Monika M
Department of Human Studies, School of Education, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 901 13th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1250, USA.
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-4410, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 29;15:1312. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2630-4.
We investigated the association between income-education groups and incident coronary heart disease (CHD) in a national prospective cohort study.
The REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke study recruited 30,239 black and white community-dwelling adults between 2003 and 2007 and collected participant-reported and in-home physiologic variables at baseline, with expert adjudicated CHD endpoints during follow-up. Mutually exclusive income-education groups were: low income (annual household income <$35,000)/low education (< high school), low income/high education, high income/low education, and high income/high education. Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HR) for incident CHD for each exposure group, examining differences by age group.
At baseline, 24,461 participants free of CHD experienced 809 incident CHD events through December 31, 2011 (median follow-up 6.0 years; interquartile range 4.5-7.3 years). Those with low income/low education had the highest incidence of CHD (10.1 [95% CI 8.4-12.1]/1000 person-years). After full adjustment, those with low income/low education had higher risk of incident CHD (HR 1.42 [95% CI: 1.14-1.76]) than those with high income/high education, but findings varied by age. Among those aged <65 years, compared with those reporting high income/high education, risk of incident CHD was significantly higher for those reporting low income/low education and low income/high education (adjusted HR 2.07 [95% CI 1.42-3.01] and 1.69 [95% CI 1.30-2.20], respectively). Those aged ≥ 65 years, risk of incident CHD was similar across income-education groups after full adjustment.
For younger individuals, low income, regardless of education, was associated with higher risk of CHD, but not observed for ≥ 65 years. Findings suggest that for younger participants, education attainment may not overcome the disadvantage conferred by low income in terms of CHD risk, whereas among those ≥ 65 years, the independent effects of income and education are less pronounced.
在一项全国性前瞻性队列研究中,我们调查了收入-教育群体与冠心病(CHD)发病之间的关联。
“中风地理和种族差异原因”研究在2003年至2007年期间招募了30239名黑人和白人社区居住成年人,并在基线时收集了参与者报告的和家庭生理变量,随访期间由专家判定冠心病终点。相互排斥的收入-教育群体为:低收入(家庭年收入<$35000)/低教育水平(<高中)、低收入/高教育水平、高收入/低教育水平和高收入/高教育水平。Cox模型估计了每个暴露组冠心病发病的风险比(HR),并按年龄组检查差异。
在基线时,24461名无冠心病的参与者在2011年12月31日前经历了809例冠心病发病事件(中位随访6.0年;四分位间距4.5 - 7.3年)。低收入/低教育水平者冠心病发病率最高(10.1[95%CI 8.4 - 12.1]/1000人年)。完全调整后,低收入/低教育水平者冠心病发病风险(HR 1.42[95%CI:1.14 - 1.76])高于高收入/高教育水平者,但结果因年龄而异。在<65岁的人群中,与报告高收入/高教育水平者相比,报告低收入/低教育水平和低收入/高教育水平者冠心病发病风险显著更高(调整后HR分别为2.07[95%CI 1.42 - 3.01]和1.69[95%CI 1.30 - 2.20])。在≥65岁的人群中,完全调整后各收入-教育群体冠心病发病风险相似。
对于较年轻个体,无论教育程度如何,低收入都与较高的冠心病风险相关,但在≥65岁人群中未观察到这种情况。研究结果表明,对于较年轻的参与者,在冠心病风险方面,教育程度可能无法克服低收入带来的不利影响,而在≥65岁的人群中,收入和教育的独立影响不太明显。