Suppr超能文献

不同激动剂和拮抗剂拉伸方式对静态和动态活动范围的急性影响。

Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on Static and Dynamic Range of Motion.

作者信息

Amiri-Khorasani Mohammadtaghi, Kellis Eleftherios

机构信息

Department of Sports Biomechanics, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, IR Iran.

Laboratory of Neuromechanics, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences at Serres, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Asian J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;6(4):e26844. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.26844. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, stretching exercises are considered as basic components of warm up aiming to prepare the musculoskeletal system for performance and to prevent injuries.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different agonist and antagonist stretching arrangements within a pre-exercise warm-up on hip static (SROM) and dynamic range of motion (DROM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty trained male subjects (Mean ± SD: height, 177.38 ± 6.92 cm; body mass, 68.4 ± 10.22 kg; age, 21.52 ± 1.17 years) volunteered to participate in this study. SROM was measured by V-sit test and DROM captured by a motion analysis system before and after (i) static stretching for both hip flexor and extensor muscles (SFSE), (ii) dynamic stretching for both hip flexor and extensor muscles (DFDE), (iii) static stretching for the hip flexors and dynamic stretching for hip extensors (SFDE), and (iv) dynamic stretching for the hip flexors and static stretching for hip extensors (DFSE).

RESULTS

DFSE showed a significantly higher increase in DROM and SROM than the remainder of the stretching protocols (P < 0.05). There were significant differences between DFDE with SFSE and SFDE (P < 0.05) and SFSE showed significant increase as compared to SFDE (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, DFSE is probably the best stretching arrangement due to producing more post activation potentiation on agonist muscles and less muscle stiffness in antagonist muscles.

摘要

背景

传统上,伸展运动被视为热身的基本组成部分,旨在让肌肉骨骼系统为运动做好准备并预防损伤。

目的

本研究的目的是检验运动前热身中不同的主动肌和拮抗肌伸展方式对髋关节静态活动度(SROM)和动态活动度(DROM)的影响。

材料与方法

60名受过训练的男性受试者(平均±标准差:身高,177.38±6.92厘米;体重,68.4±10.22千克;年龄,21.52±1.17岁)自愿参与本研究。在以下情况前后,通过V型坐姿测试测量SROM,并通过运动分析系统捕捉DROM:(i)对髋屈肌和伸肌进行静态伸展(SFSE),(ii)对髋屈肌和伸肌进行动态伸展(DFDE),(iii)对髋屈肌进行静态伸展,对髋伸肌进行动态伸展(SFDE),以及(iv)对髋屈肌进行动态伸展,对髋伸肌进行静态伸展(DFSE)。

结果

与其余伸展方案相比,DFSE在DROM和SROM方面的增加显著更高(P<0.05)。DFDE与SFSE和SFDE之间存在显著差异(P<0.05),并且SFSE与SFDE相比显示出显著增加(P<0.05)。

结论

总之,由于DFSE在主动肌上产生更多的激活后增强作用,而在拮抗肌中产生的肌肉僵硬较少,因此它可能是最佳的伸展方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bb9/4691313/f487b9e9df4c/asjsm-06-26844-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验