Martins Vânia, Moreno Teresa, Mendes Luís, Eleftheriadis Konstantinos, Diapouli Evangelia, Alves Célia A, Duarte Márcio, de Miguel Eladio, Capdevila Marta, Querol Xavier, Minguillón María Cruz
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA), CSIC, C/Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain; Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 647, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA), CSIC, C/Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Environ Res. 2016 Apr;146:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
Sampling campaigns using the same equipment and methodology were conducted to assess and compare the air quality at three South European subway systems (Barcelona, Athens and Oporto), focusing on concentrations and chemical composition of PM2.5 on subway platforms, as well as PM2.5 concentrations inside trains. Experimental results showed that the mean PM2.5 concentrations widely varied among the European subway systems, and even among different platforms within the same underground system, which might be associated to distinct station and tunnel designs and ventilation systems. In all cases PM2.5 concentrations on the platforms were higher than those in the urban ambient air, evidencing that there is generation of PM2.5 associated with the subway systems operation. Subway PM2.5 consisted of elemental iron, total carbon, crustal matter, secondary inorganic compounds, insoluble sulphate, halite and trace elements. Of all metals, Fe was the most abundant, accounting for 29-43% of the total PM2.5 mass (41-61% if Fe2O3 is considered), indicating the existence of an Fe source in the subway system, which could have its origin in mechanical friction and wear processes between rails, wheels and brakes. The trace elements with the highest enrichment in the subway PM2.5 were Ba, Cu, Mn, Zn, Cr, Sb, Sr, Ni, Sn, Co, Zr and Mo. Similar PM2.5 diurnal trends were observed on platforms from different subway systems, with higher concentrations during subway operating hours than during the transport service interruption, and lower levels on weekends than on weekdays. PM2.5 concentrations depended largely on the operation and frequency of the trains and the ventilation system, and were lower inside the trains, when air conditioning system was operating properly, than on the platforms. However, the PM2.5 concentrations increased considerably when the train windows were open. The PM2.5 levels inside the trains decreased with the trains passage in aboveground sections.
使用相同设备和方法开展了采样活动,以评估和比较南欧三个地铁系统(巴塞罗那、雅典和波尔图)的空气质量,重点关注地铁站台的PM2.5浓度和化学成分以及列车内的PM2.5浓度。实验结果表明,欧洲各地铁系统之间,甚至同一地下系统的不同站台之间,PM2.5平均浓度差异很大,这可能与不同的车站和隧道设计以及通风系统有关。在所有情况下,站台的PM2.5浓度均高于城市环境空气中的浓度,这表明地铁系统运行会产生PM2.5。地铁PM2.5由元素铁、总碳、地壳物质、二次无机化合物、不溶性硫酸盐、卤化物和微量元素组成。在所有金属中,铁含量最高,占PM2.5总质量的29%-43%(若考虑Fe2O3则为41%-61%),表明地铁系统中存在铁源,其可能源于铁轨、车轮和刹车之间的机械摩擦和磨损过程。地铁PM2.5中富集程度最高的微量元素是钡、铜、锰、锌、铬、锑、锶、镍、锡、钴、锆和钼。不同地铁系统的站台观察到类似的PM2.5日变化趋势,地铁运营时间的浓度高于运输服务中断期间,周末的浓度低于工作日。PM2.5浓度在很大程度上取决于列车的运行和频率以及通风系统,当空调系统正常运行时,列车内的PM2.5浓度低于站台。然而,当列车车窗打开时,PM2.5浓度会大幅增加。列车内的PM2.5水平随着列车在地面段的行驶而降低。