Suppr超能文献

使用激光诱导光声测量和3.0特斯拉磁共振成像评估膝关节软骨损伤的效用:一项比较研究。

Usefulness of using laser-induced photoacoustic measurement and 3.0 Tesla MRI to assess knee cartilage damage: a comparison study.

作者信息

Ukai Taku, Sato Masato, Ishihara Miya, Yokoyama Munetaka, Takagaki Tomonori, Mitani Genya, Tani Yoshiki, Yamashita Tomohiro, Imai Yutaka, Mochida Joji

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Science, Tokai University School of Medicine, Bohseidai, Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan.

Department of Medical Engineering, National Defence Medical Collage, 3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513, Japan.

出版信息

Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Dec 30;17:383. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0899-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

T2 mapping is an MRI method particularly reflective of the collagen arrangement in the cartilage, and diffusion tensor (DT) imaging captures the diffusion of water molecules. Laser-induced photoacoustic measurement (LIPA) makes it possible to assess not only the thickness of the cartilage layer but also its viscoelastic properties. By assessing cartilage damage assessment using LIPA and 3.0 Tesla MRI (T2 mapping and DT imaging), this study investigates the usefulness of the various methods.

METHODS

The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification was used to classify 29 bone cartilage pieces excised during surgical procedures. At the same time, LIPA was performed at sites matching the area of cartilage damage. MRI was performed preoperatively to measure the T2 and the apparent diffusion coefficient. In addition, tissue sections for histological assessment using the Mankin score were prepared for each ICRS grade, and the results with the various methods were compared.

RESULTS

With DT imaging, significant differences were observed in all grades (P < 0.01). With T2 mapping, significant differences were observed in all grades except for grade 1 versus grade 2 (P < 0.01). With LIPA, significant differences were observed in ICRS grade 1 versus grade 3 (P < 0.05), grade 1 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), grade 2 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), and grade 3 versus grade 4 (P < 0.05). With the Mankin score, significant differences were observed in ICRS grade 1 versus grade 3 (P < 0.01), grade 1 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), grade 2 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01), and grade 3 versus grade 4 (P < 0.01). Correlations were observed in all combinations of ICRS grade with DT imaging, T2 mapping, LIPA, and Mankin score. Correlations were observed between the degree of histological degeneration and DT imaging, T2 mapping, and ICRS grade, but LIPA had a weaker correlation than MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

In the assessment of knee osteoarthritis, there are instances where it is difficult to assess the damaged cartilage site with MRI alone, and we believe that it is desirable to use a combination of LIPA and MRI.

摘要

背景

T2 映射是一种特别能反映软骨中胶原蛋白排列的磁共振成像(MRI)方法,而扩散张量(DT)成像可捕捉水分子的扩散情况。激光诱导光声测量(LIPA)不仅能够评估软骨层的厚度,还能评估其粘弹性特性。本研究通过使用 LIPA 和 3.0 特斯拉 MRI(T2 映射和 DT 成像)来评估软骨损伤,探究了各种方法的实用性。

方法

采用国际软骨修复协会(ICRS)分类法对手术过程中切除的 29 块骨软骨碎片进行分类。同时,在与软骨损伤区域匹配的部位进行 LIPA。术前进行 MRI 以测量 T2 和表观扩散系数。此外,针对每个 ICRS 等级制备用于组织学评估的曼金评分组织切片,并比较各种方法的结果。

结果

在 DT 成像中,所有等级均观察到显著差异(P < 0.01)。在 T2 映射中,除 1 级与 2 级外,所有等级均观察到显著差异(P < 0.01)。在 LIPA 中,ICRS 1 级与 3 级(P < 0.05)、1 级与 4 级(P < 0.01)、2 级与 4 级(P < 0.01)以及 3 级与 4 级(P < 0.05)之间观察到显著差异。在曼金评分中,ICRS 1 级与 3 级(P < 0.01)、1 级与 4 级(P < 0.01)、2 级与 4 级(P < 0.01)以及 3 级与 4 级(P < 0.01)之间观察到显著差异。在 ICRS 等级与 DT 成像、T2 映射、LIPA 和曼金评分的所有组合中均观察到相关性。在组织学退变程度与 DT 成像、T2 映射和 ICRS 等级之间观察到相关性,但 LIPA 的相关性比 MRI 弱。

结论

在评估膝关节骨关节炎时,存在仅用 MRI 难以评估受损软骨部位的情况,我们认为联合使用 LIPA 和 MRI 是可取的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6ff/4718041/eb4282f9724b/13075_2015_899_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验