Haselgrove Mark, Le Pelley Mike E, Singh Navreen K, Teow Hui Qi, Morris Richard W, Green Melissa J, Griffiths Oren, Killcross Simon
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK.
School of Psychology, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Psychol. 2016 Nov;107(4):601-624. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12175. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
The relationship between learned variations in attention and schizotypy was examined in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants low on a negative subscale of schizotypy exhibited an explicit bias in overt attention towards stimuli that were established as predictive of a trial outcome, relative to stimuli that were irrelevant. The same participants also showed a bias in learning about these stimuli when they presented in a novel context. Neither of these effects was observed in participants high in schizotypy. In Experiment 2, participants low on the negative subscale of schizotypy exhibited faster reaction times towards a target that was cued by a stimulus that had a history of predictive validity relative to a stimulus that had a history of irrelevance. Again, this effect was not present in participants high in schizotypy. These results imply a disruption in the normal allocation of attention to cues that have predictive significance in schizotypy.
在两项实验中研究了习得的注意力变化与精神分裂症样特质之间的关系。在实验1中,精神分裂症样特质阴性子量表得分低的参与者在公开注意力方面表现出一种明确的偏向,即相对于无关刺激,他们会将注意力明显偏向那些被确定为可预测试验结果的刺激。当这些刺激出现在新情境中时,同样的参与者在对这些刺激的学习上也表现出偏向。在精神分裂症样特质得分高的参与者中未观察到这些效应。在实验2中,精神分裂症样特质阴性子量表得分低的参与者对由具有预测有效性历史的刺激所提示的目标表现出更快的反应时间,相对于具有无关历史的刺激。同样,这种效应在精神分裂症样特质得分高的参与者中不存在。这些结果表明,在精神分裂症样特质中,对具有预测意义的线索的正常注意力分配受到了干扰。