Suppr超能文献

公共卫生领域的系统科学与系统思维:该领域的系统综述

Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field.

作者信息

Carey Gemma, Malbon Eleanor, Carey Nicole, Joyce Andrew, Crammond Brad, Carey Alan

机构信息

Regulatory Institutions Network Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 30;5(12):e009002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009002.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This paper reports on findings from a systematic review designed to investigate the state of systems science research in public health. The objectives were to: (1) explore how systems methodologies are being applied within public health and (2) identify fruitful areas of activity.

DESIGN

A systematic review was conducted from existing literature that draws on or uses systems science (in its various forms) and relates to key public health areas of action and concern, including tobacco, alcohol, obesity and the social determinants of health.

DATA ANALYSIS

117 articles were included in the review. An inductive qualitative content analysis was used for data extraction. The following were systematically extracted from the articles: approach, methodology, transparency, strengths and weaknesses. These were then organised according to theme (ie, commonalities between studies within each category), in order to provide an overview of the state of the field as a whole. The assessment of data quality was intrinsic to the goals of the review itself, and therefore, was carried out as part of the analysis.

RESULTS

4 categories of research were identified from the review, ranging from editorial and commentary pieces to complex system dynamic modelling. Our analysis of each of these categories of research highlighted areas of potential for systems science to strengthen public health efforts, while also revealing a number of limitations in the dynamic systems modelling being carried out in public health.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a great deal of interest in how the application of systems concepts and approach might aid public health. Our analysis suggests that soft systems modelling techniques are likely to be the most useful addition to public health, and align well with current debate around knowledge transfer and policy. However, the full range of systems methodologies is yet to be engaged with by public health researchers.

摘要

目的

本文报告了一项系统综述的结果,该综述旨在调查公共卫生领域系统科学研究的现状。其目的是:(1)探讨系统方法在公共卫生领域是如何应用的;(2)确定富有成效的活动领域。

设计

对现有文献进行系统综述,这些文献借鉴或使用了系统科学(以其各种形式),并涉及公共卫生关键行动领域和关注点,包括烟草、酒精、肥胖以及健康的社会决定因素。

数据分析

该综述纳入了117篇文章。采用归纳定性内容分析法进行数据提取。从文章中系统提取了以下内容:方法、方法论、透明度、优势和劣势。然后根据主题(即每个类别内研究之间的共性)进行组织,以便对整个领域的现状进行概述。数据质量评估是综述本身目标的内在要求,因此作为分析的一部分进行。

结果

从综述中确定了4类研究,范围从社论和评论文章到复杂系统动态建模。我们对每类研究的分析突出了系统科学在加强公共卫生工作方面的潜在领域,同时也揭示了公共卫生领域正在进行的动态系统建模中的一些局限性。

结论

人们对系统概念和方法的应用如何有助于公共卫生非常感兴趣。我们的分析表明,软系统建模技术可能是对公共卫生最有用的补充,并且与当前围绕知识转移和政策的辩论非常契合。然而,公共卫生研究人员尚未全面采用所有系统方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/877a/4710830/3dd1019ef17e/bmjopen2015009002f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验