Prashanth Nuggehalli Srinivas, Marchal Bruno, Devadasan Narayanan, Kegels Guy, Criel Bart
Institute of Public Health, #250, 2 C Main, 2 C Cross, Girinagar I Phase, Bangalore 560 085, Karnataka, India.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 26;12:42. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-42.
Health systems interventions, such as capacity-building of health workers, are implemented across districts in order to improve performance of healthcare organisations. However, such interventions often work in some settings and not in others. Local health systems could be visualised as complex adaptive systems that respond variously to inputs of capacity building interventions, depending on their local conditions and several individual, institutional, and environmental factors. We aim at demonstrating how the realist evaluation approach advances complex systems thinking in healthcare evaluation by applying the approach to understand organisational change within local health systems in the Tumkur district of southern India.
We collected data on several input, process, and outcome measures of performance of the talukas (administrative sub-units of the district) and explore the interplay between the individual, institutional, and contextual factors in contributing to the outcomes using qualitative data (interview transcripts and observation notes) and quantitative measures of commitment, self-efficacy, and supervision style.
The talukas of Tumkur district responded differently to the intervention. Their responses can be explained by the interactions between several individual, institutional, and environmental factors. In a taluka with committed staff and a positive intention to make changes, the intervention worked through aligning with existing opportunities from the decentralisation process to improve performance. However, commitment towards the organisation was neither crucial nor sufficient. Committed staff in two other talukas were unable to actualise their intentions to improve organisational performance. In yet another taluka, the leadership was able to compensate for the lack of commitment.
Capacity building of local health systems could work through aligning or countering existing relationships between internal (individual and organisational) and external (policy and socio-political environment) attributes of the organisation. At the design and implementation stage, intervention planners need to identify opportunities for such triggering alignments. Local health systems may differ in their internal configuration and hence capacity building programmes need to accommodate possibilities for change through different pathways. By a process of formulating and testing hypotheses, making critical comparisons, discovering empirical patterns, and monitoring their scope and extent, a realist evaluation enables a comprehensive assessment of system-wide change in health systems.
卫生系统干预措施,如卫生工作者能力建设,在各个地区实施,以提高医疗机构的绩效。然而,此类干预措施在某些环境中有效,而在其他环境中则不然。地方卫生系统可被视为复杂适应系统,根据当地情况以及若干个体、机构和环境因素,对能力建设干预措施的投入做出不同反应。我们旨在通过将现实主义评估方法应用于印度南部图姆库尔区地方卫生系统内的组织变革理解,展示该方法如何推动医疗保健评估中的复杂系统思维。
我们收集了关于县(区行政子单位)绩效的若干输入、过程和结果指标的数据,并使用定性数据(访谈记录和观察笔记)以及承诺、自我效能感和监督风格的定量测量方法,探索个体、机构和背景因素在促成结果方面的相互作用。
图姆库尔区的县对干预措施的反应各不相同。它们的反应可以通过若干个体、机构和环境因素之间的相互作用来解释。在一个工作人员有积极性且有积极变革意愿的县,干预措施通过与分权过程中的现有机会相结合来提高绩效。然而,对组织的承诺既非关键因素也非充分因素。另外两个县中积极的工作人员未能实现其改善组织绩效的意图。在另一个县,领导层能够弥补承诺的不足。
地方卫生系统的能力建设可以通过调整或对抗组织内部(个体和组织)与外部(政策和社会政治环境)属性之间的现有关系来发挥作用。在设计和实施阶段,干预规划者需要识别此类触发调整的机会。地方卫生系统的内部结构可能不同,因此能力建设方案需要通过不同途径适应变革的可能性。通过提出和检验假设、进行关键比较、发现实证模式以及监测其范围和程度的过程,现实主义评估能够对卫生系统的全系统变革进行全面评估。