• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性单纯性呼吸道感染的处方策略:一项随机临床试验。

Prescription Strategies in Acute Uncomplicated Respiratory Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Doctor Carles Ribas Primary Care Center, Barcelona, Spain.

Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):21-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7088.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7088
PMID:26719947
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Delayed antibiotic prescription helps to reduce antibiotic use with reasonable symptom control. There are different strategies of delayed prescription, but it is not yet clear which one is the most effective.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of 2 delayed strategies in acute, uncomplicated respiratory infections.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We recruited 405 adults with acute, uncomplicated respiratory infections from 23 primary care centers in Spain to participate in a pragmatic, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to 1 of 4 potential prescription strategies: (1) a delayed patient-led prescription strategy; (2) a delayed prescription collection strategy requiring patients to collect their prescription from the primary care center; (3) an immediate prescription strategy; or (4) a no antibiotic strategy. Delayed prescription strategies consist of prescribing an antibiotic to take only if the symptoms worsen or if there is no improvement several days after the medical visit.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the duration of symptoms and severity of symptoms. Each symptom was scored using a 6-point Likert scale (scores of 3 or 4 were considered moderate; 5 or 6, severe). Secondary outcomes included antibiotic use, patient satisfaction, and patients' beliefs in the effectiveness of antibiotics.

RESULTS

A total of 405 patients were recruited, 398 of whom were included in the analysis; 136 patients (34.2%) were men; mean (SD) age, 45 (17) years. The mean severity of symptoms ranged from 1.8 to 3.5 points on the Likert scale, and mean (SD) duration of symptoms described on first visit was 6 (6) days. The mean (SD) general health status on first visit was 54 (20) based on a scale with 0 indicating worst health status; 100, best status. Overall, 314 patients (80.1%) were nonsmokers, and 372 patients (93.5%) did not have a respiratory comorbidity. The presence of symptoms on first visit was similar among the 4 groups. The mean (SD) duration of severe symptoms was 3.6 (3.3) days for the immediate prescription group and 4.7 (3.6) days for the no prescription group. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of severe symptoms was 3 (1-4) days for the prescription collection group and 3 (2-6) days for the patient-led prescription group. The median (IQR) of the maximum severity for any symptom was 5 (3-5) for the immediate prescription group and the prescription collection group; 5 (4-5) for the patient-led prescription group; and 5 (4-6) for the no prescription group. Patients randomized to the no prescription strategy or to either of the delayed strategies used fewer antibiotics and less frequently believed in antibiotic effectiveness. Satisfaction was similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Delayed strategies were associated with slightly greater but clinically similar symptom burden and duration and also with substantially reduced antibiotic use when compared with an immediate strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01363531.

摘要

重要性

延迟开抗生素处方有助于在合理控制症状的同时减少抗生素的使用。有不同的延迟处方策略,但目前尚不清楚哪种策略最有效。

目的

确定 2 种延迟策略在急性、非复杂性呼吸道感染中的疗效和安全性。

设计、地点和参与者:我们从西班牙 23 个初级保健中心招募了 405 名患有急性、非复杂性呼吸道感染的成年人,参与一项实用、开放性、随机临床试验。

干预措施

患者被随机分配到 4 种潜在处方策略中的 1 种:(1)患者主导的延迟处方策略;(2)需要患者从初级保健中心领取处方的延迟处方收集策略;(3)立即处方策略;或(4)无抗生素策略。延迟处方策略包括开抗生素,仅在症状恶化或医疗就诊后数天无改善时服用。

主要结果和测量

主要结局是症状持续时间和严重程度。每个症状均采用 6 分李克特量表进行评分(3 或 4 分为中度;5 或 6 分为重度)。次要结局包括抗生素使用、患者满意度以及患者对抗生素有效性的信念。

结果

共招募了 405 名患者,其中 398 名患者纳入分析;136 名患者(34.2%)为男性;平均(SD)年龄为 45(17)岁。症状严重程度的平均评分范围为 1.8 至 3.5 分,首次就诊时症状持续时间的平均(SD)为 6(6)天。首次就诊时的平均(SD)一般健康状况为 54(20)分,0 分表示最差的健康状况;100 分为最佳状态。总体而言,314 名患者(80.1%)为不吸烟者,372 名患者(93.5%)无呼吸系统合并症。4 组患者首次就诊时的症状均相似。立即处方组严重症状的平均(SD)持续时间为 3.6(3.3)天,无处方组为 4.7(3.6)天。处方收集组和患者主导的处方组中严重症状的中位数(四分位距[IQR])分别为 3(1-4)天和 3(2-6)天。任何症状的最大严重程度中位数(IQR)为 5(3-5)分,即立即处方组和处方收集组;5(4-5)分,即患者主导的处方组;5(4-6)分,即无处方组。随机分配至无处方策略或任何延迟策略组的患者使用的抗生素较少,且不太相信抗生素的有效性。各组的满意度相似。

结论和相关性

与立即策略相比,延迟策略与症状负担和持续时间略有增加但临床相似,也与抗生素使用量大幅减少相关。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01363531。

相似文献

1
Prescription Strategies in Acute Uncomplicated Respiratory Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial.急性单纯性呼吸道感染的处方策略:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):21-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7088.
2
Delayed antibiotic prescribing strategies for respiratory tract infections in primary care: pragmatic, factorial, randomised controlled trial.基层医疗中呼吸道感染的延迟抗生素处方策略:实用、析因、随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 6;348:g1606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1606.
3
Delayed antibiotics for symptoms and complications of respiratory infections.针对呼吸道感染症状及并发症延迟使用抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD004417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub2.
4
Rationale, design and organization of the delayed antibiotic prescription (DAP) trial: a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of delayed antibiotic prescribing strategies in the non-complicated acute respiratory tract infections in general practice.延迟抗生素处方(DAP)试验的原理、设计和组织:一般实践中非复杂性急性呼吸道感染中延迟抗生素处方策略的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 May 19;14:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-63.
5
Appropriate Antibiotic Use for Acute Respiratory Tract Infection in Adults: Advice for High-Value Care From the American College of Physicians and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.成人急性呼吸道感染抗生素的合理应用:美国医师学院和疾病控制与预防中心关于高价值医疗保健的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15;164(6):425-34. doi: 10.7326/M15-1840. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
6
Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Respiratory Infections During Influenza Seasons.流感季节急性呼吸道感染的门诊抗生素处方
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180243. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0243.
7
Delayed Antibiotic Prescribing Strategies--Time to Implement?延迟抗生素处方策略——是实施的时候了吗?
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):29-30. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7095.
8
Information leaflet and antibiotic prescribing strategies for acute lower respiratory tract infection: a randomized controlled trial.急性下呼吸道感染的信息手册与抗生素处方策略:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2005 Jun 22;293(24):3029-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.24.3029.
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing: a randomized pilot trial.减少不适当抗生素处方的行为干预措施:一项随机试点试验。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 5;16:373. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1715-8.
10
Delayed Antibiotic Prescription for Children With Respiratory Infections: A Randomized Trial.延迟为呼吸道感染患儿开具抗生素处方:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2021 Mar;147(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1323. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infection on future consultations in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.呼吸道感染抗生素处方对基层医疗未来会诊的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e099357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099357.
2
How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare.在初级保健中,延迟(备用)抗生素处方是如何、为何以及何时使用的?一项整合医疗保健不确定性概念的现实主义综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2820. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20248-8.
3
Assessing the Validity of Electronic Medical Records for Identifying High Antibiotic Prescribers in Primary Care.
评估电子病历在识别初级保健中高抗生素处方医生的有效性。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231210616. doi: 10.1177/21501319231210616.
4
Signalling need for care: a neglected functional role of medical treatment.发出护理需求信号:医疗治疗被忽视的功能作用。
Evol Med Public Health. 2023 Aug 14;11(1):363-378. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoad024. eCollection 2023.
5
Perceptions and attitudes regarding delayed antibiotic prescription for respiratory tract infections: a qualitative study.关于呼吸道感染延迟开抗生素处方的看法和态度:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Oct 4;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02123-4.
6
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections.即刻与延迟用与不用抗生素治疗呼吸道感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 4;10(10):CD004417. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub6.
7
How to design and implement an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship programme.如何设计与实施门诊抗菌药物管理计划。
Drugs Context. 2023 Feb 20;12. doi: 10.7573/dic.2022-8-2. eCollection 2023.
8
Post-consultation acute respiratory tract infection recovery: a latent class-informed analysis of individual patient data.咨询后急性呼吸道感染恢复:基于个体患者数据的潜在类别信息分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Feb 23;73(728):e196-e203. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0229. Print 2023 Mar.
9
Association of antibiotics with veteran visit satisfaction and antibiotic expectations for upper respiratory tract infections.抗生素与退伍军人对上呼吸道感染就诊满意度及抗生素期望的关联
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 23;2(1):e100. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.233. eCollection 2022.
10
Development and evaluation of a primary care antimicrobial stewardship program (PC-ASP) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省多伦多市基层医疗抗菌药物管理项目(PC-ASP)的开发与评估
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2021 May 3;6(1):32-48. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0021. eCollection 2021 Mar.