Adamu Ibrahim, Lambert Amanda, Bello Safiyya, Abdulmalik Fatima Aminu, Marshall Tom
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e099357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099357.
Prescribing antibiotics may reinforce patients' beliefs that antibiotics are needed and increase future consultations for similar symptoms. This review determines the effect of antibiotic prescribing for respiratory infections in primary care on future reattendance.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Participants were adults or children presenting with respiratory infection in primary care.
MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinical trial registries and grey literature sources were searched from inception until 6 February 2024.
Eligible studies included open-label RCTs or cohort studies of antibiotics compared with no antibiotics in adults or children with respiratory infections. The outcome of interest was reattendance at least 28 days after the initial consultation.
Two reviewers independently screened, selected, assessed the quality and extracted data. Separate meta-analyses were presented for RCT and cohort studies and a combined meta-analysis of all studies.
We identified 2128 records and reviewed 48 full texts, of which five met the inclusion criteria. These reported three RCTs (1207 randomised to antibiotics, 672 controls) and three cohort studies (209 138 exposed to antibiotics, 46 469 controls). In the meta-analysis of RCTs, relative risk (RR) of reattendance with antibiotics was 1.10 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.23), and in cohort studies, RR was 1.21 (95% CI: 0.94 to 1.49). An important limitation is that most studies were in UK primary care.
Evidence suggests prescribing antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care probably modestly increases future reattendance for similar conditions. Reducing antibiotic prescribing may help decrease demand for primary care.
CRD42023470731.
开具抗生素处方可能会强化患者对抗生素必要性的信念,并增加未来因类似症状进行的复诊。本综述旨在确定基层医疗中为呼吸道感染开具抗生素处方对未来再次就诊的影响。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,对随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究进行系统评价和Meta分析。参与者为在基层医疗中出现呼吸道感染的成人或儿童。
检索MEDLINE(Ovid)、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、临床试验注册库和灰色文献来源,检索时间从建库至2024年2月6日。
符合条件的研究包括开放标签的RCT或队列研究,比较抗生素与未使用抗生素对患有呼吸道感染的成人或儿童的影响。感兴趣的结局是初次就诊后至少28天的再次就诊情况。
两名综述作者独立进行筛选、选择、评估质量和提取数据。分别对RCT和队列研究进行Meta分析,并对所有研究进行合并Meta分析。
我们识别出2128条记录,审阅了48篇全文,其中5篇符合纳入标准。这些研究报告了3项RCT(1207例随机接受抗生素治疗,672例为对照)和3项队列研究(209138例暴露于抗生素,46469例为对照)。在RCT的Meta分析中,使用抗生素后再次就诊的相对风险(RR)为1.10(95%CI:0.99至1.23),在队列研究中,RR为1.21(95%CI:0.94至1.49)。一个重要的局限性是大多数研究来自英国的基层医疗。
有证据表明,在基层医疗中为急性呼吸道感染开具抗生素处方可能会适度增加未来因类似情况的再次就诊。减少抗生素处方可能有助于降低对基层医疗的需求。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023470731。