Zhu Qian-Xi, Gao Er-Sheng, Pathak Neha, Wu Jun-Qing, Zhou Wei-Jin
Department of Reproductive Epidemiology and Social Science, National Population and Family Planning Key Laboratory of Contraceptive Drugs and Devices, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai 200237, People's Republic of China.
Women's Health Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar;31(3):511-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev326. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
Is it necessary to collect more than one semen sample from each individual in epidemiological studies?
Single semen samples can be used in model construction as long as the model adjusts for major relevant covariates.
If a series of semen samples are taken from one individual at different times, significant intra-individual variation may exist.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 December 2000 to 20 November 2002. A total of 1010 volunteers, aged between 20 and 60 years old, were recruited.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 998 subjects were included for statistical analysis. Of these, 332 men provided single semen samples (group 1) and 666 men provided two samples (group 2). Semen parameters, including semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm number, progressive motility, vitality, and sperm morphology, were analyzed with standardized methods according to the World Health Organization (WHO) laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction (3rd edition).
Rapidly progressive motility of semen from group 1 was lower than that of group 2, but other parameters were not significantly different. The differences in mean values between the double samples were small on all semen parameters. The correlations between the two ejaculates were high, but the agreements were poor except for sperm vitality and normal morphology. Model selection and validation analysis supported the premise that the regression model from the first samples was applicable for the second samples. The large sample size with extensive quality control provides robust parameter estimation and promises good applicability for model selection and validation.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results are valid for healthy men in China, not for subfertile or infertile men.
The overall semen quality of a given group of healthy men will not vary significantly in the short term. Single semen samples can be used in model building as long as major relevant covariates are considered. Utilizing multiple semen donations may actually cause the samples to be less representative.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This research was supported by a grant from Shanghai Science and Technical Committee (02DJ14053) and a grant from Ministry of Science and Technology, China (9902). All authors have no competing interests.
在流行病学研究中,是否有必要从每个个体收集不止一份精液样本?
只要模型对主要相关协变量进行了调整,单个精液样本就可用于模型构建。
如果在不同时间从同一个体采集一系列精液样本,个体内部可能存在显著差异。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:2000年12月1日至2002年11月20日进行了一项基于人群的横断面研究。共招募了1010名年龄在20至60岁之间的志愿者。
参与者/材料、环境、方法:共有998名受试者纳入统计分析。其中,332名男性提供了单个精液样本(第1组),666名男性提供了两份样本(第2组)。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)人类精液及精子-宫颈黏液相互作用检查实验室手册(第3版)中的标准化方法,对精液参数进行分析,包括精液量、精子浓度、精子总数、前向运动率、活力和精子形态。
第1组精液的快速前向运动率低于第2组,但其他参数无显著差异。两份样本在所有精液参数上的均值差异较小。两次射精之间的相关性较高,但除精子活力和正常形态外,一致性较差。模型选择和验证分析支持了首个样本的回归模型适用于第二个样本这一前提。大样本量及广泛的质量控制提供了可靠的参数估计,并有望在模型选择和验证中具有良好的适用性。
局限性、谨慎理由:研究结果仅适用于中国的健康男性,不适用于亚生育或不育男性。
特定组健康男性的总体精液质量在短期内不会有显著变化。只要考虑主要相关协变量,单个精液样本即可用于模型构建。使用多份精液捐赠实际上可能会使样本代表性降低。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究得到上海市科学技术委员会(02DJ14053)和中国科学技术部(9902)的资助。所有作者均无利益冲突。