Patel Ashok R, Dewettinck Koen
Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Vandemoortele Centre for Lipid Science and Technology, Laboratory of Food Technology & Engineering, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2015 Nov;117(11):1772-1781. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.201400553. Epub 2015 May 5.
In lipid-based food products, fat crystals are used as building blocks for creating a crystalline network that can trap liquid oil into a 3D gel-like structure which in turn is responsible for the desirable mouth feel and texture properties of the food products. However, the recent ban on the use of trans-fat in the US, coupled with the increasing concerns about the negative health effects of saturated fat consumption, has resulted in an increased interest in the area of identifying alternative ways of structuring edible oils using non-fat-based building blocks. In this paper, we give a brief account of three alternative approaches where oil structuring was carried out using wax crystals (shellac), polymer strands (hydrophilic cellulose derivative), and emulsion droplets as structurants. These building blocks resulted in three different types of oleogels that showed distinct rheological properties and temperature functionalities. The three approaches are compared in terms of the preparation process (ease of processing), properties of the formed systems (microstructure, rheological gel strength, temperature response, effect of water incorporation, and thixotropic recovery), functionality, and associated limitations of the structured systems. The comparative evaluation is made such that the new researchers starting their work in the area of oil structuring can use this discussion as a general guideline.
Various aspects of oil binding for three different building blocks were studied in this work. The practical significance of this study includes (i) information on the preparation process and the concentrations of structuring agents required for efficient gelation and (ii) information on the behavior of oleogels to temperature, applied shear, and presence of water. This information can be very useful for selecting the type of structuring agents keeping the final applications in mind. For detailed information on the actual edible applications (bakery, chocolate, and spreads) which are based on the oleogel systems described in this manuscript, the readers are advised to refer our recent papers published elsewhere. (Food & Function 2014, 5, 645-652 and Food & Function 2014, 5, 2833-2841).
在基于脂质的食品中,脂肪晶体用作构建晶体网络的基本单元,该网络可将液态油捕获到三维凝胶状结构中,进而赋予食品所需的口感和质地特性。然而,美国近期对反式脂肪使用的禁令,以及人们对饱和脂肪摄入的负面健康影响日益担忧,促使人们对使用非脂肪基基本单元来构建食用油的替代方法越来越感兴趣。在本文中,我们简要介绍了三种替代方法,其中使用蜡晶体(虫胶)、聚合物链(亲水性纤维素衍生物)和乳液滴作为结构剂进行油的结构化。这些基本单元形成了三种不同类型的油凝胶,它们具有不同的流变学性质和温度功能。从制备过程(加工难易程度)、形成体系的性质(微观结构、流变凝胶强度、温度响应、加水效果和触变恢复)、功能以及结构化体系的相关局限性等方面对这三种方法进行了比较。进行这种比较评估是为了使刚开始从事油结构化领域研究的新研究人员能够将此讨论用作一般指南。
本研究探讨了三种不同基本单元的油结合的各个方面。这项研究的实际意义包括:(i)关于高效凝胶化所需的制备过程和结构剂浓度的信息;(ii)关于油凝胶对温度、施加剪切力和水的存在的行为的信息。这些信息对于在考虑最终应用的情况下选择结构剂类型非常有用。对于基于本文所述油凝胶体系的实际可食用应用(烘焙食品、巧克力和涂抹酱)的详细信息,建议读者参考我们近期在其他地方发表的论文。(《食品与功能》2014年,第5卷,645 - 652页和《食品与功能》2014年,第5卷,2833 - 2841页)